Literature DB >> 23871781

Establishing a target exposure for once-daily intravenous busulfan given with fludarabine and thymoglobulin before allogeneic transplantation.

James A Russell1, Shahbal B Kangarloo, Tyler Williamson, M Ahsan Chaudhry, Mary Lynn Savoie, A Robert Turner, Loree Larratt, Jan Storek, Nizar J Bahlis, Mona Shafey, Christopher B Brown, Maggie Yang, Michelle Geddes, Nancy Zacarias, Ping Yue, Peter Duggan, Douglas A Stewart, Andrew Daly.   

Abstract

A combination of fludarabine (Flu) and daily i.v. busulfan (Bu) is well tolerated and effective in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Although there is some evidence that Bu exposures exceeding 6000 μM.min [corrected] may lead to excessive toxicity, there is little information on the effect of exposures below this level on outcomes. We studied Bu exposure, as measured by area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), in 158 patients with various hematologic malignancies in an attempt to identify an optimal range for targeted therapy. The preparative chemotherapy regimen comprised Flu 50 mg/m(2) on days -6 to -2 and i.v. Bu 3.2 mg/kg on days -5 to -2 inclusive. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis included methotrexate, cyclosporin A, and antithymocyte globulin. Patients with Bu exposures below the median AUC of 4439 μM.min [corrected] were at increased risk for acute GVHD grade II-IV (hazard ratio [HR], 2.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19 to 4.49; P = .014). Those in the highest and lowest Bu exposure quartiles (daily AUC <3814 μM.min and >4993 μM.min) [corrected] had an increased risk of nonrelapse mortality (subdistribution HR, 3.32; 95% CI, 1.46 to 7.54; P = .004), as well as worse disease-free survival (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.09 to 2.99; P = .021) and overall survival (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.12 to 3.37; P = .018). Bu exposures between 4440 and 4993 μM/min were accompanied by the lowest risk of both nonrelapse mortality and acute GVHD.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Busulfan; Exposure; Pharmacokinetics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23871781     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  12 in total

1.  Harmonization of Busulfan Plasma Exposure Unit (BPEU): A Community-Initiated Consensus Statement.

Authors:  Jeannine S McCune; Christine M Quinones; James Ritchie; Paul A Carpenter; Erik van Maarseveen; Rosa F Yeh; Claudio Anasetti; Jaap J Boelens; Nelson Hamerschlak; Moustapha Hassan; Hyoung Jin Kang; Yoshinobu Kanda; Angelo Paci; Miguel-Angel Perales; Peter J Shaw; Victoria L Seewaldt; Bipin N Savani; Angela Hsieh; Betsy Poon; Mohamad Mohty; Michael A Pulsipher; Marcelo Pasquini; L Lee Dupuis
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Reduced intensity vs. myeloablative conditioning with fludarabine and PK-guided busulfan in allogeneic stem cell transplantation for patients with AML/MDS.

Authors:  Gheath Alatrash; Kelly M Kidwell; Peter F Thall; Antonio Di Stasi; Julianne Chen; Madhushree Zope; Alyssa K Crain; Richard E Champlin; Uday Popat; Elizabeth J Shpall; Roy B Jones; Borje S Andersson
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  Bayesian non-parametric survival regression for optimizing precision dosing of intravenous busulfan in allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Yanxun Xu; Peter F Thall; William Hua; Borje S Andersson
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2018-12-16       Impact factor: 1.864

4.  Intravenous Busulfan-Based Myeloablative Conditioning Regimens Prior to Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Hematologic Malignancies.

Authors:  Marcelo C Pasquini; Jennifer Le-Rademacher; Xiaochun Zhu; Andrew Artz; John DiPersio; Hugo F Fernandez; Shin Mineishi; Masaru Kamishohara; Jayesh Mehta; Yuki Nakamura; Voravit Ratanatharathorn; Ronald Sobecks; Jeanne Burkart; Christopher Bredeson
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Pharmacokinetics study of once-daily intravenous busulfan in conditioning regimens for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Miki Sato; Shinichi Kako; Kana Matsumoto; Kumi Oshima; Yu Akahoshi; Hirofumi Nakano; Tomotaka Ugai; Ryoko Yamasaki; Hidenori Wada; Yuko Ishihara; Kana Sakamoto; Koji Kawamura; Masahiro Ashizawa; Kiriko Terasako-Saito; Shun-Ichi Kimura; Hideki Nakasone; Misato Kikuchi; Aki Tanihara; Rie Yamazaki; Yukie Tanaka; Junya Kanda; Junji Nishida; Kunihiko Morita; Yoshinobu Kanda
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 2.490

6.  Fludarabine and Melphalan Compared with Reduced Doses of Busulfan and Fludarabine Improve Transplantation Outcomes in Older Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes.

Authors:  Betül Oran; Kwang Woo Ahn; Caitrin Fretham; Amer Beitinjaneh; Asad Bashey; Attaphol Pawarode; Baldeep Wirk; Bart L Scott; Bipin N Savani; Christopher Bredeson; Daniel Weisdorf; David I Marks; David Rizzieri; Edward Copelan; Gerhard C Hildebrandt; Gregory A Hale; Hemant S Murthy; Hillard M Lazarus; Jan Cerny; Jane L Liesveld; Jean A Yared; Jean Yves-Cahn; Jeffrey Szer; Leo F Verdonck; Mahmoud Aljurf; Marjolein van der Poel; Mark Litzow; Matt Kalaycio; Michael R Grunwald; Miguel Angel Diaz; Mitchell Sabloff; Mohamed A Kharfan-Dabaja; Navneet S Majhail; Nosha Farhadfar; Ran Reshef; Richard F Olsson; Robert Peter Gale; Ryotaro Nakamura; Sachiko Seo; Saurabh Chhabra; Shahrukh Hashmi; Shatha Farhan; Siddhartha Ganguly; Sunita Nathan; Taiga Nishihori; Tania Jain; Vaibhav Agrawal; Ulrike Bacher; Uday Popat; Wael Saber
Journal:  Transplant Cell Ther       Date:  2021-08-14

7.  The Correlation Between Busulfan Exposure and Clinical Outcomes in Chinese Pediatric Patients: A Population Pharmacokinetic Study.

Authors:  Xiaohuan Du; Chenrong Huang; Ling Xue; Zheng Jiao; Min Zhu; Jie Li; Jun Lu; Peifang Xiao; Xuemei Zhou; Chenmei Mao; Zengyan Zhu; Ji Dong; Xiaoxue Liu; Zhiyao Chen; Shichao Zhang; Yiduo Ding; Shaoyan Hu; Liyan Miao
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 5.988

8.  Long-term survival with mixed chimerism in patients with AML and MDS transplanted after conditioning with targeted busulfan, fludarabine, and thymoglobulin.

Authors:  Albert C Yeh; Paul V O'Donnell; Gary Schoch; Paul J Martin; Chris McFarland; Jeannine S McCune; Jason P Cooper; Kris Doney; Mary E D Flowers; Mohamed L Sorror; Frederick R Appelbaum; Barry E Storer; Ted Gooley; H Joachim Deeg
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 5.174

9.  Addition of melphalan to fludarabine/busulfan (FLU/BU4/MEL) provides survival benefit for patients with myeloid malignancy following allogeneic bone-marrow transplantation/peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation.

Authors:  Tomoaki Ueda; Tetsuo Maeda; Shinsuke Kusakabe; Jiro Fujita; Kentaro Fukushima; Takafumi Yokota; Hirohiko Shibayama; Yoshiaki Tomiyama; Yuzuru Kanakura
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 2.490

10.  Comparison of fixed dose reduced-intensity conditioning with fludarabine and busulfan to PK-guided busulfan AUC (FluBu4K) in hematopoietic stem cell transplant for AML/MDS.

Authors:  Brendan Rasor; Tyler Dickerson; Qiuhong Zhao; Patrick Elder; Jonathan E Brammer; Karilyn Larkin; Samantha Jaglowski; Alice Mims; Sam Penza; Sumithira Vasu; Sarah A Wall; Basem William; Ayman Saad; Julianna V F Roddy; Hannah Choe; Marcin Puto
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2020-11-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.