Karen Ousey1, John Stephenson2, Ted Brown3, Joanne Garside2. 1. Advancing Clinical Practice, School of Human and Health Sciences, Centre for Health and Social Care, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, West Yorkshire HD1 3DH, UK. 2. School of Human and Health Sciences, Centre for Health and Social Care, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, West Yorkshire HD1 3DH, UK. 3. Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, Monash University, Peninsula Campus, Building G, 4th Floor, PO Box 527, Frankston, Victoria 3199, Australia. Electronic address: ted.brown@monash.edu.
Abstract
AIM: To compare how health care professional students perceive their academic learning environment in one Higher Education Institution (HEI). METHOD: The Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM), a scale that measures students' perceptions of their academic classroom learning environments, and demographic items were completed by 673 undergraduate students enrolled in health professional courses at the University of Huddersfield, United Kingdom. Respondent scores, partitioned by demographic variables, were obtained on the total DREEM scale and on the individual sub-scales. Analysis of variance techniques were utilized to investigate associations between demographic variables on the total DREEM score and sub-scale scores. RESULTS: All students from all year levels reported total DREEM scores between 101 - 150, indicating a more positive than negative perception of their academic learning environments. Both profession and year of study were found to be significantly associated with total DREEM scores, with occupational therapists, physiotherapists and nurses scoring higher than operating department practice students; and first year students scoring higher than third year students. A significant interaction between these two factors was found to exist, indicating that the impact of the year of study does not apply equally over the different professional groups of students. CONCLUSIONS: Students in this study reported positive perceptions about their academic classroom learning environments and teaching delivered. Further interrogation of the DREEM sub-scale dimensions at a programme/cohort level may offer course teams' further information to inform continuous quality improvement.
AIM: To compare how health care professional students perceive their academic learning environment in one Higher Education Institution (HEI). METHOD: The Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM), a scale that measures students' perceptions of their academic classroom learning environments, and demographic items were completed by 673 undergraduate students enrolled in health professional courses at the University of Huddersfield, United Kingdom. Respondent scores, partitioned by demographic variables, were obtained on the total DREEM scale and on the individual sub-scales. Analysis of variance techniques were utilized to investigate associations between demographic variables on the total DREEM score and sub-scale scores. RESULTS: All students from all year levels reported total DREEM scores between 101 - 150, indicating a more positive than negative perception of their academic learning environments. Both profession and year of study were found to be significantly associated with total DREEM scores, with occupational therapists, physiotherapists and nurses scoring higher than operating department practice students; and first year students scoring higher than third year students. A significant interaction between these two factors was found to exist, indicating that the impact of the year of study does not apply equally over the different professional groups of students. CONCLUSIONS: Students in this study reported positive perceptions about their academic classroom learning environments and teaching delivered. Further interrogation of the DREEM sub-scale dimensions at a programme/cohort level may offer course teams' further information to inform continuous quality improvement.
Authors: Farhana Irfan; Eiad Al Faris; Nasr Al Maflehi; Syed Irfan Karim; Gominda Ponnamperuma; Hussain Saad; Abdullah Ma Ahmed Journal: Pak J Med Sci Date: 2019 Impact factor: 1.088