Literature DB >> 23871372

Genetic variance in micro-environmental sensitivity for milk and milk quality in Walloon Holstein cattle.

J Vandenplas1, C Bastin, N Gengler, H A Mulder.   

Abstract

Animals that are robust to environmental changes are desirable in the current dairy industry. Genetic differences in micro-environmental sensitivity can be studied through heterogeneity of residual variance between animals. However, residual variance between animals is usually assumed to be homogeneous in traditional genetic evaluations. The aim of this study was to investigate genetic heterogeneity of residual variance by estimating variance components in residual variance for milk yield, somatic cell score, contents in milk (g/dL) of 2 groups of milk fatty acids (i.e., saturated and unsaturated fatty acids), and the content in milk of one individual fatty acid (i.e., oleic acid, C18:1 cis-9), for first-parity Holstein cows in the Walloon Region of Belgium. A total of 146,027 test-day records from 26,887 cows in 747 herds were available. All cows had at least 3 records and a known sire. These sires had at least 10 cows with records and each herd × test-day had at least 5 cows. The 5 traits were analyzed separately based on fixed lactation curve and random regression test-day models for the mean. Estimation of variance components was performed by running iteratively expectation maximization-REML algorithm by the implementation of double hierarchical generalized linear models. Based on fixed lactation curve test-day mean models, heritability for residual variances ranged between 1.01×10(-3) and 4.17×10(-3) for all traits. The genetic standard deviation in residual variance (i.e., approximately the genetic coefficient of variation of residual variance) ranged between 0.12 and 0.17. Therefore, some genetic variance in micro-environmental sensitivity existed in the Walloon Holstein dairy cattle for the 5 studied traits. The standard deviations due to herd × test-day and permanent environment in residual variance ranged between 0.36 and 0.45 for herd × test-day effect and between 0.55 and 0.97 for permanent environmental effect. Therefore, nongenetic effects also contributed substantially to micro-environmental sensitivity. Addition of random regressions to the mean model did not reduce heterogeneity in residual variance and that genetic heterogeneity of residual variance was not simply an effect of an incomplete mean model.
Copyright © 2013 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  heterogeneity; micro-environmental sensitivity; residual variance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23871372     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-6521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  6 in total

1.  Using egg production longitudinal recording to study the genetic background of resilience in purebred and crossbred laying hens.

Authors:  Nicolas Bedere; Tom V L Berghof; Katrijn Peeters; Marie-Hélène Pinard-van der Laan; Jeroen Visscher; Ingrid David; Han A Mulder
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 5.100

2.  Genomic regions underlying uniformity of yearling weight in Nellore cattle evaluated under different response variables.

Authors:  Laiza Helena de Souza Iung; Herman Arend Mulder; Haroldo Henrique de Rezende Neves; Roberto Carvalheiro
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.969

3.  The Statistical Scale Effect as a Source of Positive Genetic Correlation Between Mean and Variability: A Simulation Study.

Authors:  Adile Tatliyer; Isabel Cervantes; Nora Formoso-Rafferty; Juan Pablo Gutiérrez
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 3.154

4.  Body Weight Deviations as Indicator for Resilience in Layer Chickens.

Authors:  Tom V L Berghof; Henk Bovenhuis; Han A Mulder
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Genome-wide association study reveals novel loci for litter size and its variability in a Large White pig population.

Authors:  E Sell-Kubiak; N Duijvesteijn; M S Lopes; L L G Janss; E F Knol; P Bijma; H A Mulder
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Genetic parameters for uniformity of harvest weight and body size traits in the GIFT strain of Nile tilapia.

Authors:  Jovana Marjanovic; Han A Mulder; Hooi L Khaw; Piter Bijma
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 4.297

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.