Literature DB >> 23871321

Circumferential margin plays an independent impact on the outcome of rectal cancer patients receiving curative total mesorectal excision.

Hung-Hsin Lin1, Jen-Kou Lin, Chun-Chi Lin, Yuan-Tzu Lan, Huann-Sheng Wang, Shung-Haur Yang, Jeng-Kai Jiang, Wei-Shone Chen, Tzu-Chen Lin, Wen-Yih Liang, Shih-Ching Chang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the circumferential resection margin on the outcomes of patients with rectal cancer undergoing total mesorectal excision.
METHODS: Medical records from July 2004 to June 2008 were prospectively reviewed, and 348 patients who underwent potentially curative surgery for rectal cancer were identified. The influence of the circumferential resection margin on local recurrence, distant metastasis, and 5-year cancer-specific survival was assessed.
RESULTS: Of 348 patients, 13 (3.7%) had positive circumferential resection margins. During a median follow-up period of 58.0 months, 8 patients (2.3%) had local recurrence and 53 (15.2%) developed distant metastases. Local recurrence rates and distant metastasis rates in patients with positive circumferential resection margins were 15.4% and 61.5%, respectively, significantly higher than in those with negative circumferential resection margins (1.8% and 13.4%, respectively) (P < .001). The 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were 75.8% and 0% for patients with tumors having negative and positive circumferential resection margins, respectively (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: A circumferential resection margin of ≤1 mm adversely affects cancer-specific survival, local recurrence, and distant metastasis.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Circumferential resection margin; Distant metastasis; Local recurrence; Rectal cancer; Total mesorectal excision

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23871321     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  11 in total

1.  Development of the 'PREDICT' score through a systematic review and meta-analysis of the predictive parameters for locoregional recurrence after total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Sualeh Muslim Khan; Sameh Hany Emile; Samer Hani Barsom; Syed Osama Ahsan
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-07-30

2.  CT/MRI pelvimetry as a useful tool when selecting patients with rectal cancer for transanal total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Alexander Ferko; Ondřej Malý; Július Örhalmi; Josef Dolejš
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  [Preoperative imaging for colorectal cancer: surgeons' perspective].

Authors:  I Iesalnieks; A Agha
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 4.  Intraoperative imaging in pathology-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Floris J Voskuil; Jasper Vonk; Bert van der Vegt; Schelto Kruijff; Vasilis Ntziachristos; Pieter J van der Zaag; Max J H Witjes; Gooitzen M van Dam
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 25.671

Review 5.  Distal dissection in total mesorectal excision, and preoperative chemoradiotherapy and lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jin-ichi Hida; Kiyotaka Okuno; Tadao Tokoro
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 6.  Pathologic processing of the total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Molly Campa-Thompson; Robert Weir; Natalie Calcetera; Philip Quirke; Susanne Carmack
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-03

7.  Quantitative Aspects of Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Rectal Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Authors:  Thiago Bassaneze; José Eduardo Gonçalves; Juliano Ferreira Faria; Rogério Tadeu Palma; Jaques Waisberg
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2017-06-25       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Meta-analysis of transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a 'New Health Technology' assessment in South Korea.

Authors:  Sun-Ho Kwon; Yea-Il Joo; Seon Hahn Kim; Dae Ho Lee; Jeong-Heum Baek; Soon Sup Chung; Ji-Yeon Shin; Chang Soo Eun; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 1.859

9.  Positive Surgical Margins in the 10 Most Common Solid Cancers.

Authors:  Ryan K Orosco; Viridiana J Tapia; Joseph A Califano; Bryan Clary; Ezra E W Cohen; Christopher Kane; Scott M Lippman; Karen Messer; Alfredo Molinolo; James D Murphy; John Pang; Assuntina Sacco; Kathryn R Tringale; Anne Wallace; Quyen T Nguyen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor after rectal cancer surgery: A large population-based retrospective study.

Authors:  Qi Liu; Dakui Luo; Sanjun Cai; Qingguo Li; Xinxiang Li
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.