Literature DB >> 23871305

Height restoration and maintenance after treating unstable osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures by cement augmentation is dependent on the cement volume used.

Antonio Krüger1, Gamal Baroud, David Noriega, Jens Figiel, Christine Dorschel, Steffen Ruchholtz, Ludwig Oberkircher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Two different procedures, used for percutaneous augmentation of vertebral compression fractures were compared, with respect to height restoration and maintenance after cyclic loading. Additionally the impact of the cement volume used was investigated.
METHODS: Wedge compression fractures were created in 36 human cadavaric vertebrae (T10-L3). Twenty-seven vertebrae were treated with the SpineJack® with different cement volumes (maximum, intermediate, and no cement), and 9 vertebrae were treated with Balloon Kyphoplasty. Vertebral heights were measured pre- and postfracture as well as after treatment and loading. Cyclic loading was performed with 10,000cycles (1Hz, 100-600N).
FINDINGS: The average anterior height after restoration was 85.56% for Kyphoplasty; 96.20% for SpineJack® no cement; 93.44% for SpineJack® maximum and 96% for the SpineJack® intermediate group. The average central height after restoration was 93.89% for Kyphoplasty; 100.20% for SpineJack® no cement; 99.56% for SpineJack® maximum and 101.13% for the SpineJack® intermediate group. The average anterior height after cyclic loading was 85.33 % for Kyphoplasty; 87.30% in the SpineJack® no cement, 92% in the SpineJack® maximum and 87% in the SpineJack® intermediate group. The average central height after cyclic loading was 92% for Kyphoplasty; 93.80% in the SpineJack® no cement; 98.56% in the SpineJack® maximum and 94.25% in the SpineJack® intermediate group.
INTERPRETATION: Height restoration was significantly better for the SpineJack® group compared to Kyphoplasty. Height maintenance was dependent on the cement volume used. The group with the SpineJack® without cement nevertheless showed better results in height maintenance, yet the statistical significance could not be demonstrated.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cement volume; Height maintenance; Height restoration; Kyphoplasty; Vertebral compression fractures

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23871305     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  14 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation Techniques in Osteoporotic and Traumatic Fractures.

Authors:  Valérie Bousson; Bassam Hamze; Guillaume Odri; Thomas Funck-Brentano; Philippe Orcel; Jean-Denis Laredo
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Risk factors for bone cement leakage in percutaneous vertebroplasty: a retrospective study of four hundred and eighty five patients.

Authors:  Si-Yuan Zhu; Zhao-Ming Zhong; Qian Wu; Jian-Ting Chen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Therapeutic effects of PKP on chronic painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with or without intravertebral cleft.

Authors:  Debo Zou; Kaining Zhang; Yanjun Ren
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

Review 4.  [Biomechanical aspects of vertebral augmentation].

Authors:  H-J Wilke
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Safety and clinical performance of kyphoplasty and SpineJack(®) procedures in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a pilot, monocentric, investigator-initiated study.

Authors:  D C Noriega; R H Ramajo; I S Lite; B Toribio; R Corredera; F Ardura; A Krüger
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Clinical outcome after the use of a new craniocaudal expandable implant for vertebral compression fracture treatment: one year results from a prospective multicentric study.

Authors:  David Noriega; Antonio Krüger; Francisco Ardura; Nils Hansen-Algenstaedt; Frank Hassel; Xavier Barreau; Jörg Beyerlein
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Controversial issues in kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Ioannis D Papanastassiou; Andreas Filis; Maria A Gerochristou; Frank D Vrionis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Clinical Performance and Safety of 108 SpineJack Implantations: 1-Year Results of a Prospective Multicentre Single-Arm Registry Study.

Authors:  David Noriega; Gianluca Maestretti; Christian Renaud; Natale Francaviglia; Mourad Ould-Slimane; Steffen Queinnec; Helmut Ekkerlein; Frank Hassel; Rainer Gumpert; Pascal Sabatier; Hervé Huet; Miguel Plasencia; Nicolas Theumann; Alexander Kunsky; Antonio Krüger
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  [Percutaneous kyphoplasty using expandable SpineJack® implant for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures].

Authors:  Moussa Diallo; Romuald Kouitcheu; Adamou Touta; Jean-Marc Kaya; Lucas Troude; Anthony Mélot; Pierre-Hugues Roche
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2020-04-22

10.  Radiofrequency-Targeted Vertebral Augmentation: Case Report of a Patient with 7 Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures in a Variant of Osteogenesis Imperfecta.

Authors:  Leonard Westermann; Peer Eysel; Marvin Simons; Kourosh Zarghooni
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2017-10-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.