BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that suggests that particular histopathologic types of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) display distinct molecular characteristics. We analyzed, in lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC), the expression of 8 genes that constitute 2 previously reported prognostic expression signatures in NSCLC. METHODS: Fresh-frozen tumor and normal lung samples were obtained at surgery from 135 patients with stage I-III NSCLC (89 (65.9%) SCC, 46 (34.1%) AC). Expression of CSF1 (colony stimulating factor for macrophages), carbonic anhydrase 9 (CA9), epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR), dual specificity phosphatase 6 (DUSP6), v-erb-b2 erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 3 (ERBB3), monocyte to macrophage differentiation-associated (MMD), lymphocyte-specific protein tyrosine kinase (LCK) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) was assessed in SCC, AC, and in normal lung by quantitative reverse transcriptase - polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Metastasis-free survival was analyzed according to the median value of gene expression in the entire NSCLC cohort and separately in SCC and AC. RESULTS: Expression of CA9, CSF1, DUSP6, STAT1, and MMD differed between NSCLC and normal lung. EGFR was more abundant in SCC compared with AC, whereas the reverse was true for DUSP6 and ERBB3. A high expression of CSF1 correlated with shorter metastasis-free survival in the entire NSCLC group (P = .016) and in SCC (P = .049) and AC (P = .034) cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Several genes considered prognostic in NSCLC showed significantly different expression in SCC and AC, and thus should be analyzed separately in these 2 subtypes for their prognostic significance. CSF1 is similarly expressed in SCC and AC, and portends a poor outcome in the entire group of patients with NSCLC, and in SCC and AC when considered separately.
BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that suggests that particular histopathologic types of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) display distinct molecular characteristics. We analyzed, in lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC), the expression of 8 genes that constitute 2 previously reported prognostic expression signatures in NSCLC. METHODS: Fresh-frozen tumor and normal lung samples were obtained at surgery from 135 patients with stage I-III NSCLC (89 (65.9%) SCC, 46 (34.1%) AC). Expression of CSF1 (colony stimulating factor for macrophages), carbonic anhydrase 9 (CA9), epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR), dual specificity phosphatase 6 (DUSP6), v-erb-b2 erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 3 (ERBB3), monocyte to macrophage differentiation-associated (MMD), lymphocyte-specific protein tyrosine kinase (LCK) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) was assessed in SCC, AC, and in normal lung by quantitative reverse transcriptase - polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Metastasis-free survival was analyzed according to the median value of gene expression in the entire NSCLC cohort and separately in SCC and AC. RESULTS: Expression of CA9, CSF1, DUSP6, STAT1, and MMD differed between NSCLC and normal lung. EGFR was more abundant in SCC compared with AC, whereas the reverse was true for DUSP6 and ERBB3. A high expression of CSF1 correlated with shorter metastasis-free survival in the entire NSCLC group (P = .016) and in SCC (P = .049) and AC (P = .034) cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Several genes considered prognostic in NSCLC showed significantly different expression in SCC and AC, and thus should be analyzed separately in these 2 subtypes for their prognostic significance. CSF1 is similarly expressed in SCC and AC, and portends a poor outcome in the entire group of patients with NSCLC, and in SCC and AC when considered separately.
Authors: Garrett L Jensen; Chad Tang; Kenneth R Hess; Zhongxing Liao; Daniel R Gomez Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis Date: 2017-07-25 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: Hannah Able; Amber Wolf-Ringwall; Aaron Rendahl; Christopher P Ober; Davis M Seelig; Chris T Wilke; Jessica Lawrence Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-08-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: M Skrzypski; P Czapiewski; K Goryca; E Jassem; L Wyrwicz; R Pawłowski; W Rzyman; W Biernat; J Jassem Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2014-01-21 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: David Gyori; Ee Lyn Lim; Francis M Grant; Dominik Spensberger; Rahul Roychoudhuri; Stephen J Shuttleworth; Klaus Okkenhaug; Len R Stephens; Phillip T Hawkins Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2018-06-07
Authors: Ander Aramburu; Isabel Zudaire; María J Pajares; Jackeline Agorreta; Alberto Orta; María D Lozano; Alfonso Gúrpide; Javier Gómez-Román; Jose A Martinez-Climent; Jacek Jassem; Marcin Skrzypski; Milind Suraokar; Carmen Behrens; Ignacio I Wistuba; Ruben Pio; Angel Rubio; Luis M Montuenga Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2015-10-06 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Allison S Cohen; Farah K Khalil; Eric A Welsh; Matthew B Schabath; Steven A Enkemann; Andrea Davis; Jun-Min Zhou; David C Boulware; Jongphil Kim; Eric B Haura; David L Morse Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2017-12-07