BACKGROUND: The efficacy of Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) for depression has been robustly supported, however, up to fifty percent of individuals do not respond fully. A growing body of research indicates Schema Therapy (ST) is an effective treatment for difficult and entrenched problems, and as such, may be an effective therapy for depression. METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial the comparative efficacy of CBT and ST for depression was examined. 100 participants with major depression received weeklycognitive behavioral therapy or schema therapy sessions for 6 months, followed by monthly therapy sessions for 6 months. Key outcomes were comparisons over the weekly and monthly sessions of therapy along with remission and recovery rates. Additional analyses examined outcome for those with chronic depression and comorbid personality disorders. RESULTS:ST was not significantly better (nor worse) than CBT for the treatment of depression. The therapies were of comparable efficacy on all key outcomes. There were no differential treatment effects for those with chronic depression or comorbid personality disorders. LIMITATIONS: This study needs replication. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary research indicates that ST may provide an effective alternative therapy for depression.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) for depression has been robustly supported, however, up to fifty percent of individuals do not respond fully. A growing body of research indicates Schema Therapy (ST) is an effective treatment for difficult and entrenched problems, and as such, may be an effective therapy for depression. METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial the comparative efficacy of CBT and ST for depression was examined. 100 participants with major depression received weekly cognitive behavioral therapy or schema therapy sessions for 6 months, followed by monthly therapy sessions for 6 months. Key outcomes were comparisons over the weekly and monthly sessions of therapy along with remission and recovery rates. Additional analyses examined outcome for those with chronic depression and comorbid personality disorders. RESULTS: ST was not significantly better (nor worse) than CBT for the treatment of depression. The therapies were of comparable efficacy on all key outcomes. There were no differential treatment effects for those with chronic depression or comorbid personality disorders. LIMITATIONS: This study needs replication. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary research indicates that ST may provide an effective alternative therapy for depression.
Authors: Catherine R Ayers; James O E Pittman; Eliza J Davidson; Mary E Dozier; Tina L Mayes; Erin Almklov Journal: J Obsessive Compuls Relat Disord Date: 2018-08-09 Impact factor: 1.677
Authors: Ole Jakob Storebø; Jutta M Stoffers-Winterling; Birgit A Völlm; Mickey T Kongerslev; Jessica T Mattivi; Mie S Jørgensen; Erlend Faltinsen; Adnan Todorovac; Christian P Sales; Henriette E Callesen; Klaus Lieb; Erik Simonsen Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2020-05-04
Authors: John Philip Louis; Vida Ortiz; Joanna Barlas; Joyce Sue Lee; George Lockwood; Wayne Freeman Chong; Karen McDonald Louis; Patricia Sim Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Marit Kool; Henricus L Van; Anna Bartak; Saskia C M de Maat; Arnoud Arntz; Johanna W van den Eshof; Jaap Peen; Matthijs Blankers; Judith E Bosmans; Jack J M Dekker Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2018-08-07 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Johannes Kopf-Beck; Petra Zimmermann; Samy Egli; Martin Rein; Nils Kappelmann; Julia Fietz; Jeanette Tamm; Katharina Rek; Susanne Lucae; Anna-Katharine Brem; Philipp Sämann; Leonhard Schilbach; Martin E Keck Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2020-10-14 Impact factor: 3.630