Literature DB >> 23870299

Reproducibility of graft preparations in Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt1, Bjoern O Bachmann, Theofilos Tourtas, Claus Cursiefen, Matthias Zenkel, Kathrin Rössler, Friedrich E Kruse.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the reproducibility of manual graft preparation and evaluate the incidence rate and nature of structural anomalies of Descemet's membrane (DM) preventing successful graft preparation in DM endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).
DESIGN: Prospective, single-center, nonrandomized, consecutive case series. PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed 350 corneoscleral buttons from donors aged 18-95 years stored in Optisol-GS or Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and used for DMEK surgery in 343 consecutive patients with Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy or pseudophakic bullous keratopathy.
METHODS: Residual endothelial cell-DM complexes obtained after successful DM stripping for DMEK and whole donor corneas obtained after unsuccessful DM stripping were examined by transmission electron microscopy and immunohistochemistry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Accuracy of the cleavage plane between DM and corneal stroma and structural abnormalities of the DM-stroma interface.
RESULTS: Uneventful manual separation without any disruption of DM was achieved in 335 of 350 donor corneas (95.7%) by use of a previously established bimanual submerged preparation technique. Correspondingly, the peeled DM specimens revealed a regular and smooth cleavage plane exposing the amorphous interfacial matrix on their anterior surface. Although 8 of 350 donor corneas (2.3%) showed focal adhesions of DM to the corneal stroma and developed isolated tears during stripping, preparation of the graft could be successfully completed. However, 7 of the 350 donor corneas (2.0%) showed extremely strong adhesion and multiple tears of DM, preventing successful preparation of the graft. These specimens revealed either ultrastructural (peg-like interlockings) or biochemical abnormalities (increased staining intensities for adhesive glycoproteins) along the DM-stroma interface.
CONCLUSIONS: Using an appropriate technique, manual preparation of grafts for DMEK with reproducible tissue qualities is possible in the vast majority (98%) of donor corneas. Although a relatively rare phenomenon, interindividual variations in DM structure and composition may be responsible for failure of graft preparation in about 2% of donor corneas. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any of the materials discussed in this article.
Copyright © 2013 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23870299     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.06.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  14 in total

1.  Risk factors for eye bank preparation failure of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty tissue.

Authors:  Lucas M M Vianna; Christopher G Stoeger; Joshua D Galloway; Mark Terry; Leslie Cope; Rubens Belfort; Albert S Jun
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  The effect of donor diabetes history on graft failure and endothelial cell density 10 years after penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Jonathan H Lass; Tonya D Riddlesworth; Robin L Gal; Craig Kollman; Beth A Benetz; Francis W Price; Alan Sugar; Mark A Terry; Mark Soper; Roy W Beck
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Novel liquid bubble dissection technique for DMEK lenticule preparation.

Authors:  Peter Szurman; Kai Januschowski; Annekatrin Rickmann; Lara-Jil Damm; Karl Thomas Boden; Natalia Opitz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Two-photon optical microscopy imaging of endothelial keratoplasty grafts.

Authors:  Marco Lombardo; Mohit Parekh; Sebastiano Serrao; Alessandro Ruzza; Stefano Ferrari; Giuseppe Lombardo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Evolving Techniques in Corneal Transplantation.

Authors:  Grace E Boynton; Maria A Woodward
Journal:  Curr Surg Rep       Date:  2015-02-01

Review 6.  [Complications of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty].

Authors:  K Spaniol; M Borrelli; C Holtmann; S Schrader; G Geerling
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 7.  Eye-bank preparation of endothelial tissue.

Authors:  Grace E Boynton; Maria A Woodward
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.761

8.  Scanning electron microscopy assessment of the Descemet membrane interface during DMEK graft preparation.

Authors:  Javier Cabrerizo; Thomas Forshaw; Clara Rodriguez-Aierbe; Jesus Garrido-Fierro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  A Novel Approach of Harvesting Viable Single Cells from Donor Corneal Endothelium for Cell-Injection Therapy.

Authors:  Hon Shing Ong; Gary Peh; Dawn Jin Hui Neo; Heng-Pei Ang; Khadijah Adnan; Chan Lwin Nyein; Fernando Morales-Wong; Maninder Bhogal; Viridiana Kocaba; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  A cost-minimization analysis of tissue-engineered constructs for corneal endothelial transplantation.

Authors:  Tien-En Tan; Gary S L Peh; Benjamin L George; Howard Y Cajucom-Uy; Di Dong; Eric A Finkelstein; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.