Literature DB >> 23870215

Quantification of risk for early unplanned readmission after rectal resection: a single-center study.

Matthias Turina1, Feza H Remzi, David W Dietz, Ravi Pokala Kiran, Dilara Seyidova-Khoshknabi, Jeff P Hammel, Jon D Vogel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several factors predictive of readmission after colorectal surgery have been identified. Although often grouped together in readmission studies, colon and rectal resections differ in many ways. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with readmission after rectal resection. STUDY
DESIGN: We performed a retrospective, single-center cohort study of 565 patients who underwent rectal resections at a tertiary referral center in 2010 and 2011. The main outcomes measure was readmission within 30 days. Univariate comparison between readmitted and nonreadmitted patients was followed by a stepwise logistic regression to identify independent risk factors for readmission.
RESULTS: There were 105 patients (18.6%) readmitted. Indication (inflammatory bowel disease [IBD], p = 0.008), type of operation (pelvic pouch surgery, p = 0.02), use of laparoscopy (readmission 27.8% vs 14%, p < 0.001), and length of operation (p < 0.001) were associated with a higher readmission rate on univariate analysis. Neither preoperative chemoradiation (p = 0.89) nor American Society of Anesthesiologists class (p = 0.09) was associated with readmission. Logistic regression showed use of laparoscopy (odds ratio [OR] 1.94, 95% CI 1.23 to 3.07), initial diagnosis of IBD (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.93), and length of operation (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.16 per 30 minutes) to be independent risk factors. Risks of readmission were 6.7%, 13.4%, 27.4%, and 27.4% with 0, 1, 2, or 3 positive risk factors, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Readmission after rectal resection is associated with the indication for surgery and the operative technique used. Optimization of factors related to the underlying pathology and careful appraisal of the operative technique may result in decreased readmission after proctectomy.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ASA; American Society of Anesthesiologists; ERAS; IBD; IPAA; OR; SSI; enhanced recovery after surgery; ileal pouch-anal anastomosis; inflammatory bowel disease; odds ratio; surgical site infection

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23870215     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  4 in total

1.  Factors associated with hospital readmission following diverting ileostomy creation.

Authors:  W Li; L Stocchi; D Cherla; G Liu; A Agostinelli; C P Delaney; S R Steele; E Gorgun
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Risk of readmission after laparoscopic vs. open colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Iyare O Esemuede; Alodia Gabre-Kidan; Dennis L Fowler; Ravi P Kiran
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  FACTORS RELATED TO THE REDUCTION OF THE RISK OF COMPLICATIONS IN COLORECTAL SURGERY WITHIN PERIOPERATIVE CARE RECOMMENDED BY THE ACERTO PROTOCOL.

Authors:  Alberto Bicudo-Salomão; Rosana de Freitas Salomão; Mariani Parra Cuerva; Michelle Santos Martins; Diana Borges Dock-Nascimento; José Eduardo de Aguilar-Nascimento
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2019-12-20

4.  Comparison of Urban-Rural Readmission Rates After Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Findings From a Privately Insured Population.

Authors:  Mesnad Alyabsi; Mary Charlton; Jane Meza; K M Monirul Islam; Amr Soliman; Shinobu Watanabe-Galloway
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.