Literature DB >> 23870198

Design considerations for studies of the biomechanical environment of the femoropopliteal arteries.

Farzana Ansari1, Lindsay K Pack, Steven S Brooks, Tina M Morrison.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to review the available literature regarding the biomechanics of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) and popliteal artery (PA) in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Stents are one of many available therapies used to treat patients with PAD. Because stents are permanent implants, they undergo a variety of deformations as patients go about their daily activities such as walking, sitting in a chair, or climbing stairs. As a part of the marketing application for United States Food and Drug Administration approval, stents need to be evaluated for long-term durability under a variety of loading modes. The information available in the literature provides direction for such evaluation.
METHODS: We performed a literature search of the PubMed database looking for "key vessel" and "mechanics" (all fields) or "deformation" (all fields) or "flexion" (all fields) or "mechanical environment" (all fields) or "tortuosity" (all fields) or "dynamics" (all fields) or "forces" (all fields), where the "key vessel" was "Femoral Artery," "Superficial Femoral Artery," "Popliteal Artery," and "Femoropopliteal."
RESULTS: Using a decision tree, we found 12 relevant articles that focused solely on the nonradial cyclic deformations associated with musculoskeletal motion. Despite the many limitations associated with combining these studies, we learned that under walking conditions, the proximal and mid-SFA deforms, on average, by shortening in the axial direction 4.0%, by twisting 2.1°/cm, and by bending 72.1 mm; the distal SFA and proximal PA deform by shortening in the axial direction 13.9%, by twisting 3.5°/cm, and by being pinched such that the aspect ratio of the lumen changes 4.6%. The distal PA deforms by shortening in the axial direction 12.3%, by twisting 3.5°/cm, by bending 22.1 mm, and by being pinched such that the aspect ratio of the lumen changes 12.5%.
CONCLUSIONS: A review of the current literature reveals heterogeneous study designs that confound interpretation. Studies included different physiologic settings from young to mature participants, participants with and without disease, and cadavers. Investigators used a range of imaging modalities and definitions of arterial segments, which affected our ability to compile the data as we learned that deformations vary according to the specific anatomic location within the SFA/PA. As a result of this analysis, we identified design considerations for future studies, because although this work has been valuable and significant, there are many limitations with the currently available data such that all we know about the SFA/PA environment is that we don't know. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23870198     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.03.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  17 in total

1.  Comparison of femoropopliteal artery stents under axial and radial compression, axial tension, bending, and torsion deformations.

Authors:  Kaspars Maleckis; Paul Deegan; William Poulson; Cole Sievers; Anastasia Desyatova; Jason MacTaggart; Alexey Kamenskiy
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2017-07-13

2.  Limb flexion-induced twist and associated intramural stresses in the human femoropopliteal artery.

Authors:  Anastasia Desyatova; William Poulson; Paul Deegan; Carol Lomneth; Andreas Seas; Kaspars Maleckis; Jason MacTaggart; Alexey Kamenskiy
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Nickel-Titanium peripheral stents: Which is the best criterion for the multi-axial fatigue strength assessment?

Authors:  Francesca Berti; Pei-Jiang Wang; Andrea Spagnoli; Giancarlo Pennati; Francesco Migliavacca; Elazer R Edelman; Lorenza Petrini
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2020-10-18

4.  Coating and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Air Spray Coated Drug Coated Balloons.

Authors:  Emily A Turner; Marzieh K Atigh; Megan M Erwin; Uwe Christians; Saami K Yazdani
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.495

5.  In Vivo Morphological Changes of the Femoropopliteal Arteries due to Knee Flexion After Endovascular Treatment of Popliteal Aneurysm.

Authors:  Giovanni Spinella; Alice Finotello; Bianca Pane; Giancarlo Salsano; Simone Mambrini; Alexey Kamenskiy; Valerio Gazzola; Giuseppe Cittadini; Ferdinando Auricchio; Domenico Palombo; Michele Conti
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 3.487

6.  Effect of aging on mechanical stresses, deformations, and hemodynamics in human femoropopliteal artery due to limb flexion.

Authors:  Anastasia Desyatova; Jason MacTaggart; Rodrigo Romarowski; William Poulson; Michele Conti; Alexey Kamenskiy
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2017-08-16

7.  The choice of a constitutive formulation for modeling limb flexion-induced deformations and stresses in the human femoropopliteal arteries of different ages.

Authors:  Anastasia Desyatova; Jason MacTaggart; William Poulson; Paul Deegan; Carol Lomneth; Anjali Sandip; Alexey Kamenskiy
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2016-11-21

Review 8.  Successful Peripheral Vascular Intervention in Patients with High-risk Comorbidities or Lesion Characteristics.

Authors:  E Hope Weissler; J Antonio Gutierrez; Manesh R Patel; Rajesh V Swaminathan
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Validating Fatigue Safety Factor Calculation Methods for Cardiovascular Stents.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 10.  Nitinol Stents in the Femoropopliteal Artery: A Mechanical Perspective on Material, Design, and Performance.

Authors:  Kaspars Maleckis; Eric Anttila; Paul Aylward; William Poulson; Anastasia Desyatova; Jason MacTaggart; Alexey Kamenskiy
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.