Literature DB >> 23870053

Robot-assisted transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty: technique and perioperative outcomes from a single institution.

Scott Tobis1, Justin Houman, Marguerite Thomer, Hani Rashid, Guan Wu.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site (U-LESS) pyeloplasty may provide improved cosmesis compared with conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty. However, U-LESS pyeloplasty can be challenging because of the need for extensive suturing. The wristed instrumentation of robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site (R-LESS) pyeloplasty provides improved dexterity to facilitate intracorporeal suturing. We therefore present our technique and experience with R-LESS pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The da Vinci(®) S or Si Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA) was used in all cases. Ureteral stents were placed cystoscopically at the start of each case. A 3-cm skin incision was made adjacent to the umbilicus. Three ports (12 mm, 8 mm, and 5 mm) were placed either through separate fascial incisions or into a GelPort(®) (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA). Key techniques included port staggering, a "chopstick" arrangement of the instruments, and use of a 30° lens in an upward configuration. Traditional dismembered pyeloplasty procedures were performed in all cases. Patients less than 45 years of age with no prior abdominal surgery were offered this approach.
RESULTS: Eight patients (4 female; 5 right-sided; median age, 22 years) underwent R-LESS pyeloplasty without the need for additional ports. All patients were discharged by the third postoperative day, and 5 were discharged on Day 1. One patient experienced urine leakage, which was managed with a temporary nephrostomy tube. Length of follow-up ranged from 29 to 46 months. No patients have developed symptoms or radiographic evidence of recurrent UPJO.
CONCLUSIONS: R-LESS pyeloplasty can be safely performed for selected patients with currently available robotic equipment. Careful patient selection and case setup are key to successfully performing these procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23870053     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2012.0577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  4 in total

1.  First Canadian experience with robotic single-incision pyeloplasty: Comparison with multi-incision technique.

Authors:  Jeffrey Law; Neal Rowe; Jason Archambault; Sofia Nastis; Alp Sener; Patrick P Luke
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Current status of robotic single-port surgery.

Authors:  Ryan J Nelson; Jaya Sai S Chavali; Nitin Yerram; Paurush Babbar; Jihad H Kaouk
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

Review 3.  Single port robotic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew Lai; Ryan W Dobbs; Susan Talamini; Whitney R Halgrimson; Jessica O Wilson; Hari T Vigneswaran; Simone Crivellaro
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-04

Review 4.  Recent advances in urologic surgical techniques for pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Mikolaj Mendrek; Thomas Alexander Vögeli; Christian Bach
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-03-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.