Literature DB >> 23869967

Isolation of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth: a dimensional concept analysis.

Michael J Johnson1, Elaine J Amella.   

Abstract

AIM: To present the findings of a dimensional analysis of isolation in the context, and from the perspective, of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth.
BACKGROUND: Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth are often at greater risk for negative health outcomes compared with heterosexual youth. Isolation is one risk factor cited throughout the literature; however, the concept is complicated and has many uses and thus warrants clarification.
DESIGN: Concept Analysis. DATA SOURCES: Sources comprise 35 English language research articles retrieved from CINAHL and EBSCOHost (1987-2012).
METHODS: A dimensional concept analysis was undertaken to analyse how the concept, isolation, is socially constructed.
RESULTS: This dimensional analysis revealed five socially constructed dimensions and four sub-dimensions. These findings indicate that there is substantial variability in the concept of isolation. These differences and variations are most notably observed in the 20 articles (57%) that had more than one dimension. Although some of these articles were explicit with the different meanings and use of the concept, most of the papers had wide variability in the use and meaning of the concept.
CONCLUSION: The disproportionately greater physical and mental health disparities between lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender and heterosexual youth are a signal to conduct more research to clarify the concept of isolation, to develop instrumentation to identify at-risk youth and to explore predictors and consequences of isolation. Nurses and others can lead the way in translating this knowledge into strategies that will improve the health and lives of these young people.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adolescent; bisexuality; child; concept analysis; homosexuality; nursing; nursing research; nursing theory; suicide; transgendered persons

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23869967     DOI: 10.1111/jan.12212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  5 in total

Review 1.  Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) Survivorship.

Authors:  Charles Kamen
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.315

2.  Psychological Well-Being of Trans* People in Italy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Critical Issues and Personal Experiences.

Authors:  Marta Mirabella; Giulia Senofonte; Guido Giovanardi; Vittorio Lingiardi; Alexandro Fortunato; Francesco Lombardo; Anna Maria Speranza
Journal:  Sex Res Social Policy       Date:  2021-08-14

Review 3.  Conceptualising paediatric health disparities: a metanarrative systematic review and unified conceptual framework.

Authors:  Jennifer L Ridgeway; Zhen Wang; Lila J Finney Rutten; Michelle van Ryn; Joan M Griffin; M Hassan Murad; Gladys B Asiedu; Jason S Egginton; Timothy J Beebe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Critical Consciousness for Connectivity: Decoding Social Isolation Experienced by Latinx and LGBTQ+ Youth Using a Multi-Stakeholder Approach to Health Equity.

Authors:  Nancy Vargas; Jesse L Clark; Ivan A Estrada; Cynthia De La Torre; Nili Yosha; Mario Magaña Alvarez; Richard G Parker; Jonathan Garcia
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-04       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  "Everybody Puts Their Whole Life on Facebook": Identity Management and the Online Social Networks of LGBTQ Youth.

Authors:  Elizabeth McConnell; Bálint Néray; Bernie Hogan; Aaron Korpak; Antonia Clifford; Michelle Birkett
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-05-26       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.