Literature DB >> 23869066

Multiple inert gas elimination technique by micropore membrane inlet mass spectrometry--a comparison with reference gas chromatography.

Moritz Kretzschmar1, Thomas Schilling, Andreas Vogt, Hans Ulrich Rothen, João Batista Borges, Thomas Hachenberg, Anders Larsson, James E Baumgardner, Göran Hedenstierna.   

Abstract

The mismatching of alveolar ventilation and perfusion (VA/Q) is the major determinant of impaired gas exchange. The gold standard for measuring VA/Q distributions is based on measurements of the elimination and retention of infused inert gases. Conventional multiple inert gas elimination technique (MIGET) uses gas chromatography (GC) to measure the inert gas partial pressures, which requires tonometry of blood samples with a gas that can then be injected into the chromatograph. The method is laborious and requires meticulous care. A new technique based on micropore membrane inlet mass spectrometry (MMIMS) facilitates the handling of blood and gas samples and provides nearly real-time analysis. In this study we compared MIGET by GC and MMIMS in 10 piglets: 1) 3 with healthy lungs; 2) 4 with oleic acid injury; and 3) 3 with isolated left lower lobe ventilation. The different protocols ensured a large range of normal and abnormal VA/Q distributions. Eight inert gases (SF6, krypton, ethane, cyclopropane, desflurane, enflurane, diethyl ether, and acetone) were infused; six of these gases were measured with MMIMS, and six were measured with GC. We found close agreement of retention and excretion of the gases and the constructed VA/Q distributions between GC and MMIMS, and predicted PaO2 from both methods compared well with measured PaO2. VA/Q by GC produced more widely dispersed modes than MMIMS, explained in part by differences in the algorithms used to calculate VA/Q distributions. In conclusion, MMIMS enables faster measurement of VA/Q, is less demanding than GC, and produces comparable results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MIGET; gas chromatography; inert gases; mass spectrometry; membrane inlet; ventilation/perfusion distributions

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23869066     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00072.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  6 in total

1.  Near-real-time pulmonary shunt and dead space measurement with micropore membrane inlet mass spectrometry in pigs with induced pulmonary embolism or acute lung failure.

Authors:  D Gerber; R Vasireddy; B Varadarajan; V Hartwich; M Y Schär; B Eberle; A Vogt
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Measuring short-term changes in specific ventilation using dynamic specific ventilation imaging.

Authors:  Eric T Geier; G Kim Prisk; Rui C Sá
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2022-04-28

3.  An in vitro lung model to assess true shunt fraction by multiple inert gas elimination.

Authors:  Balamurugan Varadarajan; Andreas Vogt; Volker Hartwich; Rakesh Vasireddy; Jolanda Consiglio; Beate Hugi-Mayr; Balthasar Eberle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Endexpiratory lung volume measurement correlates with the ventilation/perfusion mismatch in lung injured pigs.

Authors:  Jens Kamuf; Andreas Garcia-Bardon; Bastian Duenges; Tanghua Liu; Antje Jahn-Eimermacher; Florian Heid; Matthias David; Erik K Hartmann
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2017-05-23

Review 5.  Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2018-2019 end of year summary: respiration.

Authors:  D S Karbing; G Perchiazzi; S E Rees; M B Jaffe
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Effects of methacholine infusion on desflurane pharmacokinetics in piglets.

Authors:  Alf Kozian; Moritz Kretzschmar; James E Baumgardner; Jens Schreiber; Göran Hedenstierna; Anders Larsson; Thomas Hachenberg; Thomas Schilling
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2015-11-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.