Literature DB >> 23867591

Gastric cancer staging with radiologic imaging modalities and UICC staging system.

Hye Seong Ahn1, Se Hyung Kim, Yasuhiro Kodera, Han-Kwang Yang.   

Abstract

There are two major stage classification systems for gastric cancer: the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stages by the International Union against Cancer (UICC) and the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma by the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA). Preoperative stage classification using either of these systems is essential for deciding on the treatment strategy in the era of various multimodal therapeutic options. Evolution of multidetector computerized tomography with isotropic volumetric imaging and various 3D images has increased the accuracy of T and N staging in patients with gastric cancer, although detection of peritoneal deposits and nodal metastasis in the absence of lymphadenopathy remain problematic with the imaging tools currently available. The TNM and JGCA classifications have undergone revisions independent of each other, and the discrepancies were not helpful when international comparisons and cooperation were needed. More recently, the JGCA and TNM classifications were merged to have identical T and N categories, in addition to the more straightforward M categories that indicate the presence of distant metastasis. The result of these efforts is that researchers in Japan and the rest of the world are now looking at a similar disease when they discuss cancer that belongs to the same stage. A nomogram that incorporates other established prognostic determinants in addition to the TNM component may be a future direction for a more sophisticated means of predicting outcome. The increasing incidence of junctional (esophagogastric junction) cancer in the Far East has spurred researchers from this region to adequately stage the disease and to consider suitable treatment modalities for this disease entity, whereas Western researchers are more inclined to treat this disease as esophageal cancer. This could be an area for future international debate. For the next more accurate staging, we suggest the collaboration between Eastern and Western high-volume centers in gastric cancer because the inconsistency of surgical approaches, especially with respect to nodal resection, remains a barrier to mutual understanding.
Copyright © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23867591     DOI: 10.1159/000350881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Surg        ISSN: 0253-4886            Impact factor:   2.588


  10 in total

1.  CT differentiation of poorly-differentiated gastric neuroendocrine tumours from well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours and gastric adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Seong Ho Kim; Se Hyung Kim; Min-A Kim; Cheong-il Shin; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Expression and significance of annexin A2 in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma and the association with E-cadherin.

Authors:  Yuehua Han; Jun Ye; Ying Dong; Zhipeng Xu; Qin DU
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 3.  The role of three-dimensional multidetector CT gastrography in the preoperative imaging of stomach cancer: emphasis on detection and localization of the tumor.

Authors:  Jin Woong Kim; Sang Soo Shin; Suk Hee Heo; Hyo Soon Lim; Nam Yeol Lim; Young Kyu Park; Yong Yeon Jeong; Heoung Keun Kang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Microrna-136 promotes proliferation and invasion ingastric cancer cells through Pten/Akt/P-Akt signaling pathway.

Authors:  Xuyan Chen; Zhiming Huang; Renpin Chen
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Estimating postoperative survival rate of gastric cancer patients and its effective factors in Babol, northern Iran: 2006-2011.

Authors:  Seyed-Reza Modarres; Abdolrahim Gholizadeh-Pasha; Soheil Khatibi; Sepideh Siadati
Journal:  Caspian J Intern Med       Date:  2017

Review 6.  Adjuvant chemoradiation for gastric carcinoma: State of the art and perspectives.

Authors:  A Schernberg; E Rivin Del Campo; B Rousseau; O Matzinger; M Loi; P Maingon; F Huguet
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-03-13

Review 7.  Endoscopic Ultrasound vs. Computed Tomography for Gastric Cancer Staging: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Bogdan Silviu Ungureanu; Victor Mihai Sacerdotianu; Adina Turcu-Stiolica; Irina Mihaela Cazacu; Adrian Saftoiu
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-16

Review 8.  The current and possible future role of 3D modelling within oesophagogastric surgery: a scoping review.

Authors:  Henry Robb; Gemma Scrimgeour; Piers Boshier; Anna Przedlacka; Svetlana Balyasnikova; Gina Brown; Fernando Bello; Christos Kontovounisios
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.453

9.  Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Expression in Unresectable Gastric Cancers: Relationship with CT Characteristics.

Authors:  Jeong Sub Lee; Se Hyung Kim; Seock-Ah Im; Min A Kim; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Effect of the degree of gastric filling on the measured thickness of advanced gastric cancer by computed tomography.

Authors:  Li Yang; Yong Li; Tao Zhou; Gaofeng Shi; Jiangyang Pan; Jing Liu; Guangda Wang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 2.967

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.