BACKGROUND: Health examination surveys (HESs), including both questionnaire and physical measurements, and in most cases also collection of biological samples, can provide objective health indicators. This information complements data from health interview surveys and administrative registers, and is important for evidence-based planning of health policies and prevention activities. HESs are valuable data sources for research. The first national HESs in Europe were conducted in the late 1950s and early 1960s. They have recently been carried out in an increasing number of countries, but there has been no joint standardization between the countries. METHODS: The European Health Examination Survey Pilot Project was conducted in 2009-2012. The European Health Examination Survey Pilot Reference Centre was established and pilot surveys were conducted in 12 countries. RESULTS: European standardized protocols for key measurements on main chronic disease risk factors (height, weight, waist circumference, blood pressure, blood lipids and fasting glucose or HbA1c) were prepared. European-level training and external quality assessment were organized. Although the level of earlier experience, infrastructures, economic status and cultural settings varied between the pilot countries, it was possible to standardize measurements of HESs across the populations. Obtaining high participation rates was challenging. CONCLUSION: HESs provide high-quality and representative population data to support policy decisions and research. For future national HESs, centralized coordination, training and external quality assessment are needed to ensure comparability of the results. Further studies on effects of different survey methods on comparability of the results and on recruitment and motivation of survey participants are needed.
BACKGROUND: Health examination surveys (HESs), including both questionnaire and physical measurements, and in most cases also collection of biological samples, can provide objective health indicators. This information complements data from health interview surveys and administrative registers, and is important for evidence-based planning of health policies and prevention activities. HESs are valuable data sources for research. The first national HESs in Europe were conducted in the late 1950s and early 1960s. They have recently been carried out in an increasing number of countries, but there has been no joint standardization between the countries. METHODS: The European Health Examination Survey Pilot Project was conducted in 2009-2012. The European Health Examination Survey Pilot Reference Centre was established and pilot surveys were conducted in 12 countries. RESULTS: European standardized protocols for key measurements on main chronic disease risk factors (height, weight, waist circumference, blood pressure, blood lipids and fasting glucose or HbA1c) were prepared. European-level training and external quality assessment were organized. Although the level of earlier experience, infrastructures, economic status and cultural settings varied between the pilot countries, it was possible to standardize measurements of HESs across the populations. Obtaining high participation rates was challenging. CONCLUSION: HESs provide high-quality and representative population data to support policy decisions and research. For future national HESs, centralized coordination, training and external quality assessment are needed to ensure comparability of the results. Further studies on effects of different survey methods on comparability of the results and on recruitment and motivation of survey participants are needed.
Authors: Jennifer S Mindell; Alison Moody; Andres I Vecino-Ortiz; Tania Alfaro; Patricia Frenz; Shaun Scholes; Silvia A Gonzalez; Paula Margozzini; Cesar de Oliveira; Luz Maria Sanchez Romero; Andres Alvarado; Sebastián Cabrera; Olga L Sarmiento; Camilo A Triana; Simón Barquera Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2017-09-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Jennifer S Mindell; Simona Giampaoli; Antje Goesswald; Panagiotis Kamtsiuris; Charlotte Mann; Satu Männistö; Karen Morgan; Nicola J Shelton; W M Monique Verschuren; Hanna Tolonen Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2015-10-05 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Hanna Tolonen; Päivikki Koponen; Ala'a Al-Kerwi; Nada Capkova; Simona Giampaoli; Jennifer Mindell; Laura Paalanen; Maria Ruiz-Castell; Antonia Trichopoulou; Kari Kuulasmaa Journal: Arch Public Health Date: 2018-06-28
Authors: Dritan Bejko; Maria Ruiz-Castell; Anna Schritz; Bjarne Laursen; Rupert Kisser; Wim Rogmans; Ronan A Lyons; Huib Valkenberg; Samantha Turner; Robert Bauer; Gabrielle Ellsaesser; Nathalie de Rekeneire Journal: Arch Public Health Date: 2018-12-17
Authors: Katri Kilpeläinen; Suvi Parikka; Päivikki Koponen; Seppo Koskinen; Tuulia Rotko; Timo Koskela; Mika Gissler Journal: Glob Health Action Date: 2016-02-29 Impact factor: 2.640
Authors: Valéry Bocquet; Jessica Barré; Sophie Couffignal; Marylène d'Incau; Charles Delagardelle; Georges Michel; Marc Schlesser; Saverio Stranges; Andrea Kuemmerle; Maria Ruiz-Castell Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-10-11 Impact factor: 3.295