Literature DB >> 23867211

Safety and efficacy of denosumab for adults and skeletally mature adolescents with giant cell tumour of bone: interim analysis of an open-label, parallel-group, phase 2 study.

Sant Chawla1, Robert Henshaw, Leanne Seeger, Edwin Choy, Jean-Yves Blay, Stefano Ferrari, Judith Kroep, Robert Grimer, Peter Reichardt, Piotr Rutkowski, Scott Schuetze, Keith Skubitz, Arthur Staddon, David Thomas, Yi Qian, Ira Jacobs.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) is a very rare, aggressive, and progressive osteolytic tumour for which no standard medicinal treatment or chemotherapy exists. We report interim safety and efficacy results from a phase 2 study of denosumab in patients with GCTB.
METHODS: We did an international, open-label, parallel-group, phase 2 trial of patients with histologically confirmed GCTB and radiographically measurable active disease. Eligible patients were adults or skeletally mature adolescents with radiographic evidence of at least one mature long bone who were at least 12 years old and weighed at least 45 kg. We divided patients into three cohorts--those with surgically unsalvageable GCTB (cohort 1), those with salvageable GCTB whose surgery was associated with severe morbidity (cohort 2), and those who transferred from a previous study of denosumab for GCTB (cohort 3). Patients in cohorts 1 and 2 received 120 mg of subcutaneous denosumab every 4 weeks with loading doses on days 8 and 15 of the first cycle; those in cohort 3 continued the regimen from the previous study. Investigator-determined disease status and clinical benefit were assessed every 4 weeks. Our primary endpoint was the safety profile of denosumab in terms of adverse events and laboratory abnormalities. Prespecified secondary endpoints were time to disease progression in cohort 1 and the proportion of patients without any surgery at 6 months in cohort 2. Safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of denosumab. Efficacy analyses included all eligible patients who received at least one dose of denosumab. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT00680992.
FINDINGS: 282 patients, including ten adolescents, were included between Sept 9, 2008, and March 25, 2011. Of the 281 patients analysable for safety, three (1%) had osteonecrosis of the jaw and 15 (5%) hypocalcaemia. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were hypophosphataemia, which occurred in nine (3%) patients, and anaemia, back pain, and pain in extremities, each of which occurred in three patients (1%). Serious adverse events were reported in 25 (9%) patients. No treatment-related deaths were reported. On the basis of investigators' assessment of disease status, 163 of 169 (96%) analysable patients in cohort 1 had no disease progression after median follow-up of 13 months (IQR 5·8-21·0). In cohort 2, 74 of 100 (74%) analysable patients had no surgery and 16 of 26 (62%) patients who had surgery underwent a less morbid procedure than planned. Median follow-up in cohort 2 was 9·2 months (IQR 4·2-12·9).
INTERPRETATION: Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of denosumab. Denosumab was associated with tumour responses and reduced the need for morbid surgery in patients with GCTB. Denosumab represents a new treatment option for patients with GCTB. FUNDING: Amgen.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23867211     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70277-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  173 in total

1.  From Bench to Bedside: Targeted Therapy, Denosumab, and 21st Century Orthopaedics: Targets Abound, But Where Are The Therapies?

Authors:  Benjamin K Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Role of genetic and molecular profiling in sarcomas.

Authors:  Scott M Norberg; Sujana Movva
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2015-05

Review 3.  Giant Cell Tumor of the Larynx Treated by Surgery and Adjuvant Denosumab: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Aaron E Yancoskie; Douglas K Frank; John E Fantasia; Steven Savona; Nicole Eiseler; Ilan Reder; Leonard B Kahn
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2015-03-08

Review 4.  Denosumab in the treatment of giant cell tumor of the spine. Preliminary report, review of the literature and protocol proposal.

Authors:  Stefano Boriani; Riccardo Cecchinato; Fabrizio Cuzzocrea; Stefano Bandiera; Marco Gambarotti; Alessandro Gasbarrini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Giant cell tumor of the bone: aggressive case initially treated with denosumab and intralesional surgery.

Authors:  Donald von Borstel; Roberto A Taguibao; Nicholas A Strle; Joseph E Burns
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Conservative surgery in the treatment of giant cell tumor of the sacrum: 35 years' experience.

Authors:  Stepan V Domovitov; Chandhanarat Chandhanayingyong; Patrick J Boland; David G McKeown; John H Healey
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2015-10-30

7.  Giant cell tumor of the thoracic spine causing acute paraplegia-a case report.

Authors:  Christopher Lucasti; Dil Patel; Bradley Hawayek; Mark Maraschiello; Joseph Kowalski
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-06

Review 8.  Mechanisms of action of therapeutic antibodies for cancer.

Authors:  J M Redman; E M Hill; D AlDeghaither; L M Weiner
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 4.407

Review 9.  Mechanisms that drive bone pain across the lifespan.

Authors:  Patrick W Mantyh
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 10.  Targeted Therapies in the Treatment of Sarcomas.

Authors:  Brianna Hoffner; Anthony D Elias; Victor M Villalobos
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.493

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.