AIMS: To evaluate the additional value of dobutamine stress testing in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) by relating stress imaging parameters at baseline to relevant parameters of clinical condition and right ventricular (RV) size during a serial follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively included 27 patients (14 ± 4 years at baseline), who were studied twice with a 5-year interval. Patients underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to assess RV systolic and diastolic function at rest and during dobutamine stress. Normal response to dobutamine was defined as a decrease in RV end-systolic volume, and a increase in RV ejection fraction (EF) during stress. Exercise testing and electrocardiography were performed to determine peak oxygen uptake (peak VO₂), QRS duration, and QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) interval. RV volumes, QRS duration, and QTc interval increased significantly from baseline to follow-up; peak VO₂ tended to decrease (95 ± 20-89 ± 14%, P = 0.086). Response to dobutamine was normal in 26 of 27 patients and remained stable during the follow-up [relative increase in RVEF during stress: +25 ± 9% (baseline) vs. +27 ± 10% (follow-up)]. A smaller relative increase in RVEF during stress at baseline related to a larger relative decrease in peak VO₂ during the follow-up (r = 0.59, P = 0.004). No significant associations were found with the relative increase in QRS duration, QTc interval, or RV end-diastolic volume during a 5-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: In a young TOF population, response to dobutamine stress was normal and remained stable during the 5-year follow-up. A smaller increase in RVEF during stress at baseline was predictive for a larger decrease in peak VO₂ during the 5-year follow-up.
AIMS: To evaluate the additional value of dobutamine stress testing in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) by relating stress imaging parameters at baseline to relevant parameters of clinical condition and right ventricular (RV) size during a serial follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively included 27 patients (14 ± 4 years at baseline), who were studied twice with a 5-year interval. Patients underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to assess RV systolic and diastolic function at rest and during dobutamine stress. Normal response to dobutamine was defined as a decrease in RV end-systolic volume, and a increase in RV ejection fraction (EF) during stress. Exercise testing and electrocardiography were performed to determine peak oxygen uptake (peak VO₂), QRS duration, and QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) interval. RV volumes, QRS duration, and QTc interval increased significantly from baseline to follow-up; peak VO₂ tended to decrease (95 ± 20-89 ± 14%, P = 0.086). Response to dobutamine was normal in 26 of 27 patients and remained stable during the follow-up [relative increase in RVEF during stress: +25 ± 9% (baseline) vs. +27 ± 10% (follow-up)]. A smaller relative increase in RVEF during stress at baseline related to a larger relative decrease in peak VO₂ during the follow-up (r = 0.59, P = 0.004). No significant associations were found with the relative increase in QRS duration, QTc interval, or RV end-diastolic volume during a 5-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: In a young TOF population, response to dobutamine stress was normal and remained stable during the 5-year follow-up. A smaller increase in RVEF during stress at baseline was predictive for a larger decrease in peak VO₂ during the 5-year follow-up.
Entities:
Keywords:
cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging; dobutamine stress; exercise capacity; serial follow-up; tetralogy of Fallot
Authors: Eugenio Picano; Quirino Ciampi; Lauro Cortigiani; Adelaide M Arruda-Olson; Clarissa Borguezan-Daros; José Luis de Castro E Silva Pretto; Rosangela Cocchia; Eduardo Bossone; Elisa Merli; Garvan C Kane; Albert Varga; Gergely Agoston; Maria Chiara Scali; Doralisa Morrone; Iana Simova; Martina Samardjieva; Alla Boshchenko; Tamara Ryabova; Alexander Vrublevsky; Attila Palinkas; Eszter D Palinkas; Robert Sepp; Marco A R Torres; Hector R Villarraga; Tamara Kovačević Preradović; Rodolfo Citro; Miguel Amor; Hugo Mosto; Michael Salamè; Paul Leeson; Cristina Mangia; Nicola Gaibazzi; Domenico Tuttolomondo; Costantina Prota; Jesus Peteiro; Caroline M Van De Heyning; Antonello D'Andrea; Fausto Rigo; Aleksandra Nikolic; Miodrag Ostojic; Jorge Lowenstein; Rosina Arbucci; Diego M Lowenstein Haber; Pablo M Merlo; Karina Wierzbowska-Drabik; Jaroslaw D Kasprzak; Maciej Haberka; Ana Cristina Camarozano; Nithima Ratanasit; Fabio Mori; Maria Grazia D'Alfonso; Luigi Tassetti; Alessandra Milazzo; Iacopo Olivotto; Alberto Marchi; Hugo Rodriguez-Zanella; Angela Zagatina; Ratnasari Padang; Milica Dekleva; Ana Djordievic-Dikic; Nikola Boskovic; Milorad Tesic; Vojislav Giga; Branko Beleslin; Giovanni Di Salvo; Valentina Lorenzoni; Matteo Cameli; Giulia Elena Mandoli; Tonino Bombardini; Pio Caso; Jelena Celutkiene; Andrea Barbieri; Giovanni Benfari; Ylenia Bartolacelli; Alessandro Malagoli; Francesca Bursi; Francesca Mantovani; Bruno Villari; Antonello Russo; Michele De Nes; Clara Carpeggiani; Ines Monte; Federica Re; Carlos Cotrim; Giuseppe Bilardo; Ariel K Saad; Arnas Karuzas; Dovydas Matuliauskas; Paolo Colonna; Francesco Antonini-Canterin; Mauro Pepi; Patricia A Pellikka Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-08-17 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Vivian P Kamphuis; Roel L F van der Palen; Patrick J H de Koning; Mohammed S M Elbaz; Rob J van der Geest; Albert de Roos; Arno A W Roest; Jos J M Westenberg Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-06-22 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Eva van den Bosch; Judith A A E Cuypers; Saskia E Luijnenburg; Nienke Duppen; Eric Boersma; Ricardo P J Budde; Gabriel P Krestin; Nico A Blom; Hans M P J Breur; Miranda M Snoeren; Jolien W Roos-Hesselink; Livia Kapusta; Willem A Helbing Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 6.875