Literature DB >> 23866788

Sensitivity of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography standard cytology: 10-y review of the literature.

Atuhani S Burnett1, Thomas J Calvert, Ravi J Chokshi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biliary strictures present a unique diagnostic challenge to clinicians as they can be caused by both benign and malignant conditions. With the high mortalities associated with hepatopancreaticobiliary malignancies, accurate and rapid tissue diagnosis is imperative and typically done before initiation of treatment. However, the exact sensitivity of standard cytology from endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to diagnose malignancy remains unclear because of wide distribution of reported values in the literature. Furthermore, the use of radical surgery to obtain tissue when cytology is indeterminate has led to questions about the role of ERCP in patients with biliary strictures.
METHODS: A PubMed search was conducted using the terms ERCP, cytology, and brushings. Articles reviewed were published between 2002 and 2012, had patient population with biliary stricture, and had ERCP brushing results and final pathology available for review. The cytology and pathology data were abstracted from each study, and the combined overall sensitivity was calculated.
RESULTS: Sixteen studies were identified, with sensitivities ranging from 6%-64% and 99% confidence intervals (CIs) ranging from ±6% to ±32%. A combined total of 1556 patients were included, with positive ERCP cytology results in 358 cases. On final pathology, however, 861 patients were positive for malignancy. When the data were combined, we found an overall sensitivity of 41.6% ± 3.2% (99% CI) with a negative predictive value of 58.0% ± 3.2% (99% CI).
CONCLUSIONS: ERCP brushings suffer from low sensitivity and negative predictive value. This study questions the utility of ERCP to change the surgical management of these diseases in patients with radiographic evidence of a neoplasm or high suspicion of a malignancy.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biliary cancer; Brushings; ERCP; Pancreatic cancer; Sensitivity

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23866788     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.06.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  37 in total

Review 1.  Advanced endoscopic imaging of indeterminate biliary strictures.

Authors:  James H Tabibian; Kavel H Visrodia; Michael J Levy; Christopher J Gostout
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10

Review 2.  Biomarkers in bile-complementing advanced endoscopic imaging in the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures.

Authors:  Vennisvasanth Lourdusamy; Benjamin Tharian; Udayakumar Navaneethan
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-04-16

Review 3.  Cholangioscopy in the digital era.

Authors:  Fares Ayoub; Dennis Yang; Peter V Draganov
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-10-29

4.  Cytologic predictors of malignancy in bile duct brushings: a multi-reviewer analysis of 60 cases.

Authors:  Vaidehi Avadhani; Ezgi Hacihasanoglu; Bahar Memis; Burcin Pehlivanoglu; Krisztina Z Hanley; Uma Krishnamurti; Alyssa M Krasinskas; Adeboye O Osunkoya; Lauren M Daniels; Alexa A Freedman; Michael Goodman; Volkan Adsay; Michelle D Reid
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  Cytologic Diagnosis of Bile Duct Strictures: Brush or Scrape?

Authors:  Jason S Gold
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 6.  Role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of benign biliary strictures: What's new?

Authors:  Rosa Ferreira; Rui Loureiro; Nuno Nunes; António Alberto Santos; Rui Maio; Marília Cravo; Maria Antónia Duarte
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-02-25

Review 7.  Management of Malignant Biliary Obstruction.

Authors:  Jonathan M Lorenz
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 8.  Comparative effectiveness of biliary brush cytology and intraductal biopsy for detection of malignant biliary strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Udayakumar Navaneethan; Basile Njei; Vennisvasanth Lourdusamy; Rajesh Konjeti; John J Vargo; Mansour A Parsi
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 9.  Evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures.

Authors:  Christopher L Bowlus; Kristin A Olson; M Eric Gershwin
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 46.802

10.  Outcomes of Different Methods for Analysis of Biliary Brush Cytology and of Factors Associated with Positive Diagnosis in an Age-Dependent Retrospective Review.

Authors:  Mariana Costa; Jorge Canena; Luís Mascarenhas-Lemos; Rafaela Loureiro; Mário Silva; Diana Carvalho; Tiago Capela; Pedro Russo; Gonçalo Ramos; António Mateus-Dias; Mário Ferraz-Oliveira; Pedro Mota Veiga; João Coimbra
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.