Literature DB >> 23866780

Efficiency of bupivacaine versus lidocaine and methylprednisolone versus placebo to reduce postoperative pain and swelling after surgical removal of mandibular third molars: a randomized, double-blinded, crossover clinical trial.

Jennifer Christensen1, Louise Hauge Matzen, Michael Vaeth, Ann Wenzel, Søren Schou.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare 4 treatment combinations to reduce postoperative pain and swelling after surgical removal of mandibular third molars. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients scheduled for bilateral mandibular third molar removal were randomized to 1 of 4 treatment groups in a double-blinded crossover design: 1) first operation: lidocaine and placebo, second operation: bupivacaine and methylprednisolone; 2) first operation: bupivacaine and methylprednisolone, second operation: lidocaine and placebo; 3) first operation: lidocaine and methylprednisolone, second operation: bupivacaine and placebo; 4) first operation: bupivacaine and placebo, second operation: lidocaine and methylprednisolone. Patient-reported pain and swelling were recorded using visual analog scales 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours after surgery and daily during the first postoperative week. The treatment effects were estimated as contrasts between the average differences within the treatment groups and assessed by stratified t tests.
RESULTS: A total of 126 patients (57 women and 69 men; mean age, 25.0 years) were included in the analysis. No significant interactions between local analgesia and methylprednisolone were observed. The administration of bupivacaine resulted in less postoperative pain up to 12 hours after surgery (P < .004) and more postoperative swelling 4 to 12 hours after surgery (P < .001) compared with lidocaine. The administration of methylprednisolone resulted in less postoperative pain 4 to 12 hours and 2 days after surgery (P < .05) and less postoperative swelling 6 and 12 hours and 1 to 3 days after surgery (P < .04) compared with placebo.
CONCLUSIONS: Bupivacaine combined with methylprednisolone reduced the postoperative pain and swelling compared with the use of lidocaine and placebo, lidocaine and methylprednisolone, or bupivacaine and placebo.
Copyright © 2013 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23866780     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  3 in total

1.  Effectiveness of anesthetic solutions for pain control in lower third molar extraction surgeries: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials with network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marco Tulio Rossi; Murilo Navarro de Oliveira; Maria Tereza Campos Vidigal; Walbert de Andrade Vieira; Cristiano Elias Figueiredo; Cauane Blumenberg; Vinicius Lima de Almeida; Luiz Renato Paranhos; Luciana Butini Oliveira; Walter Luiz Siqueira; Rui Barbosa de Brito Júnior
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-11-08       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Bupivacaine versus lignocaine as the choice of locall anesthetic agent for impacted third molar surgery a review.

Authors:  K Balakrishnan; Vijay Ebenezer; Abu Dakir; Saravana Kumar; D Prakash
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2015-04

3.  Randomized controlled trial to compare oral analgesic requirements and patient satisfaction in using oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs versus benzydamine hydrochloride oral rinses after mandibular third molar extraction: a pilot study.

Authors:  Devalina Goswami; Gaurav Jain; Mangesh Mohod; Dalim Kumar Baidya; Ongkila Bhutia; Ajoy Roychoudhury
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2018-02-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.