Literature DB >> 23865840

Continuous glucose monitoring pilot in low-income type 1 diabetes patients.

Paola A Sequeira1, Lucy Montoya, Valerie Ruelas, Dongyuan Xing, Vincent Chen, Roy Beck, Anne L Peters.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has been shown to be a valuable tool to improve glycemic control in patients with diabetes. The objective of this pilot study was to develop and implement CGM in an existing diabetes clinic for low-income patients on multiple daily injections. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled, crossover pilot study. Initial focus groups were held to create low-literacy, Spanish and English guides to the use of carbohydrate counting and CGM. These tools were implemented to train participants on carbohydrate counting and insulin adjustments participants. Subjects were then randomized to start in Group A (CGM) or Group B (self-monitoring blood glucose and then switched after 28 weeks). Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was obtained at baseline and at the end of both study phases.
RESULTS: Twenty-five economically challenged, primarily Latino participants with minimal prior education on intensive diabetes management completed the study. No significant reduction in HbA1c or decrease in time spent in parameters of low and high blood glucose was shown. However, eighty percent of participants who completed the study wanted to continue to use CGM once the research study was over. The participants also felt that the CGM made adjusting insulin easier.
CONCLUSIONS: CGM can be implemented in patients from a low-income public clinic; however, HbA1c reduction was not achieved. Given the underlying lack of baseline self-management knowledge, a longer trial might be necessary to see benefit with CGM in this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23865840      PMCID: PMC3781124          DOI: 10.1089/dia.2013.0072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  11 in total

1.  Risk for metabolic control problems in minority youth with diabetes.

Authors:  A M Delamater; K H Shaw; E B Applegate; I A Pratt; M Eidson; G X Lancelotta; L Gonzalez-Mendoza; S Richton
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Improved glycemic control in poorly controlled patients with type 1 diabetes using real-time continuous glucose monitoring.

Authors:  Dorothee Deiss; Jan Bolinder; Jean-Pierre Riveline; Tadej Battelino; Emanuele Bosi; Nadia Tubiana-Rufi; David Kerr; Moshe Phillip
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Racial and ethnic differences in glycemic control of adults with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  M I Harris; R C Eastman; C C Cowie; K M Flegal; M S Eberhardt
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Effect on glycemic control by short- and long-term use of continuous glucose monitoring in clinical practice.

Authors:  Jenny Anderson; Stig Attvall; Lennart Sternemalm; Aldina Pivodic; Martin Fahlén; Ragnar Hanås; Gunnar Ekeroth; Marcus Lind
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-11-01

5.  Validation of measures of satisfaction with and impact of continuous and conventional glucose monitoring.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  D M Nathan; S Genuth; J Lachin; P Cleary; O Crofford; M Davis; L Rand; C Siebert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-09-30       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Association of health literacy with diabetes outcomes.

Authors:  Dean Schillinger; Kevin Grumbach; John Piette; Frances Wang; Dennis Osmond; Carolyn Daher; Jorge Palacios; Gabriela Diaz Sullivan; Andrew B Bindman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002 Jul 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Improving patient education for patients with low literacy skills.

Authors:  E J Mayeaux; P W Murphy; C Arnold; T C Davis; R H Jackson; T Sentell
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.292

9.  Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  William V Tamborlane; Roy W Beck; Bruce W Bode; Bruce Buckingham; H Peter Chase; Robert Clemons; Rosanna Fiallo-Scharer; Larry A Fox; Lisa K Gilliam; Irl B Hirsch; Elbert S Huang; Craig Kollman; Aaron J Kowalski; Lori Laffel; Jean M Lawrence; Joyce Lee; Nelly Mauras; Michael O'Grady; Katrina J Ruedy; Michael Tansey; Eva Tsalikian; Stuart Weinzimer; Darrell M Wilson; Howard Wolpert; Tim Wysocki; Dongyuan Xing
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-09-08       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in a clinical care environment: evidence from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation continuous glucose monitoring (JDRF-CGM) trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  13 in total

1.  The Effectiveness of Self-Management Interventions for Individuals with Low Health Literacy and/or Low Income: A Descriptive Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jamie Schaffler; Katerina Leung; Sarah Tremblay; Laura Merdsoy; Eric Belzile; Angella Lambrou; Sylvie D Lambert
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Analysis of the ADA's Standard of Diabetes Care Recommendation for Continuous Glucose Monitoring System.

Authors:  Jessica Hanae Zafra-Tanaka; Ana Brañez-Condorena; David R Soriano-Moreno; Alvaro Taype-Rondan
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-08-29

3.  Equity in Medical Care for People Living With Diabetes.

Authors:  Jaquelin Flores Garcia; Anne L Peters; Jennifer K Raymond; Jennifer Fogel; Sharon Orrange
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2022-08-15

Review 4.  Diabetes: the role of continuous glucose monitoring.

Authors:  Julianna Rivich Kluemper; Alexandria Smith; Brooke Wobeter
Journal:  Drugs Context       Date:  2022-06-14

Review 5.  Effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in maintaining glycaemic control among people with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Evelyn Teo; Norasyikin Hassan; Wilson Tam; Serena Koh
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 10.460

Review 6.  Disparities in Care Delivery and Outcomes in Young Adults With Diabetes.

Authors:  Shivani Agarwal; Marisa Hilliard; Ashley Butler
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2018-07-14       Impact factor: 4.810

7.  Effects of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  I Dicembrini; C Cosentino; M Monami; E Mannucci; L Pala
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 4.280

8.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Underserved and Minority Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in an Interprofessional Internal Medicine Clinic.

Authors:  Arden Bui; Jennifer Kim
Journal:  Innov Pharm       Date:  2020-12-03

9.  The impact of neuropathic pain and other comorbidities on the quality of life in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Vesna Dermanovic Dobrota; Pero Hrabac; Dinko Skegro; Ranko Smiljanic; Savko Dobrota; Ingrid Prkacin; Neva Brkljacic; Kristijan Peros; Martina Tomic; Vesna Lukinovic-Skudar; Vanja Basic Kes
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  A Decade of Disparities in Diabetes Technology Use and HbA1c in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: A Transatlantic Comparison.

Authors:  Ananta Addala; Marie Auzanneau; Kellee Miller; Werner Maier; Nicole Foster; Thomas Kapellen; Ashby Walker; Joachim Rosenbauer; David M Maahs; Reinhard W Holl
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.