Literature DB >> 23865554

Long-term results of a three arms prospective cohort study on implants in periodontally compromised patients: 10-year data around sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface.

Mario Roccuzzo1, Luca Bonino, Paola Dalmasso, Marco Aglietta.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) implants in patients previously treated for periodontitis and in periodontally healthy patients (PHP).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and forty-nine partially edentulous patients were consecutively enrolled in private specialist practice and divided into three groups according to their periodontal condition: PHP, moderately periodontally compromised patients (PCP) and severely PCP. Implants were placed to support fixed prostheses, after successful completion of initial periodontal therapy. At the end of active periodontal treatment (APT), patients were asked to follow an individualized supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) program. Diagnosis and treatment of peri-implant biological complications were performed according to cumulative interceptive supportive therapy (CIST). At 10 years, clinical and radiographic measures were recorded by two calibrated operators, blind to the initial patient classification, on 123 patients, as 26 were lost to follow up. The number of sites treated according to therapy modalities C and D (antibiotics and/or surgery) during the 10 years was registered.
RESULTS: Six implants were removed for biological complications. The implant survival rate was 100% for PHP, 96.9% for moderate PCP and 97.1% for severe PCP. Antibiotic and/or surgical therapy was performed in 18.8% of cases in PHP, in 52.2% of cases in moderate PCP and in 66.7% cases in severe PCP, with a statistically significant differences between PHP and both PCP groups. At 10 years, the percentage of implants, with at least one site that presented a PD ≥ 6 mm, was, respectively, 0% for PHP, 9.4% for moderate PCP and 10.8% for severe PCP, with a statistically significant difference between PHP and both PCP groups.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that SLA implants, placed under a strict periodontal control, offer predictable long-term results. Nevertheless, patients with a history of periodontitis, who did not fully adhere to the SPT, presented a statistically significant higher number of sites that required additional surgical and/or antibiotic treatment. Therefore, patients should be informed, from the beginning, of the value of the SPT in enhancing long-term outcomes of implant therapy, particularly those affected by periodontitis.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CIST; SLA surface; biological complications; dental implants; implant failure; peri-implantitis; periodontally compromised patients; periodontitis; supportive periodontal therapy; survival; tooth loss

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23865554     DOI: 10.1111/clr.12227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  21 in total

Review 1.  Multi-Scale Surface Treatments of Titanium Implants for Rapid Osseointegration: A Review.

Authors:  Qingge Wang; Peng Zhou; Shifeng Liu; Shokouh Attarilar; Robin Lok-Wang Ma; Yinsheng Zhong; Liqiang Wang
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 5.076

2.  Effect of periodontitis history on implant success: a long-term evaluation during supportive periodontal therapy in a university setting.

Authors:  Christian Graetz; Karim Fawzy El-Sayed; Antje Geiken; Anna Plaumann; Sonja Sälzer; Eleonore Behrens; Jörg Wiltfang; Christof E Dörfer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  What is the prevalence of peri-implantitis? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pedro Diaz; Esther Gonzalo; Luis J Gil Villagra; Barbara Miegimolle; Maria J Suarez
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 3.747

4.  Early radiographic diagnosis of peri-implantitis enhances the outcome of peri-implantitis treatment: a 5-year retrospective study after non-surgical treatment.

Authors:  Hee-Yung Chang; Shin-Young Park; Jin-Ah Kim; Young-Kyun Kim; Hyo-Jung Lee
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 2.614

Review 5.  The Efficacy of Supportive Peri-Implant Therapies in Preventing Peri-Implantitis and Implant Loss: a Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Ausra Ramanauskaite; Tellervo Tervonen
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2016-09-09

Review 6.  Risk Factors for Peri-Implantitis: Effect of History of Periodontal Disease and Smoking Habits. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Claudio Stacchi; Federico Berton; Giuseppe Perinetti; Andrea Frassetto; Teresa Lombardi; Aiman Khoury; Francesca Andolsek; Roberto Di Lenarda
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2016-09-09

7.  Implant Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses Using a New Monotype Zirconia Implant-A Case Report.

Authors:  Stefan Roehling; Georges Ghazal; Thomas Borer; Florian Thieringer; Michael Gahlert
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2015-09-17

8.  Long-term follow-up of full-arch immediate implant-supported restorations in edentulous jaws: a clinical study.

Authors:  Laura Werbelow; Michael Weiss; Alexander Schramm
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2020-07-30

9.  Full arch fixed prostheses vs. full arch telescopic-retained retrievable prostheses both supported by implants and natural tooth abutments in periodontally treated patients: Results at 15 years.

Authors:  Renzo Guarnieri; Dario Di Nardo; Gianni Di Giorgio; Gabriele Miccoli; Luca Testarelli
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-10-01

Review 10.  Peri-implant disease: what we know and what we need to know.

Authors:  Nicola Alberto Valente; Sebastiano Andreana
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 2.614

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.