Literature DB >> 23864130

The impact of eplerenone at different levels of risk in patients with systolic heart failure and mild symptoms: insight from a novel risk score for prognosis derived from the EMPHASIS-HF trial.

Timothy J Collier1, Stuart J Pocock, John J V McMurray, Faiez Zannad, Henry Krum, Dirk J van Veldhuisen, Karl Swedberg, Harry Shi, John Vincent, Bertram Pitt.   

Abstract

AIMS: Our objective was to create a simple prognostic risk score for patients with systolic heart failure and mild symptoms. We then assessed the efficacy of eplerenone across different categories of risk. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The Eplerenone in Mild Patients Hospitalization and Survival Study in Heart Failure trial (EMPHASIS-HF) was an international randomized trial, comparing eplerenone with placebo in 2737 patients with systolic heart failure and mild symptoms. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure, over a median 2.1 years follow-up. Using multivariable Cox modelling age, sex, systolic blood pressure, estimated glomerular filtration rate, diabetes, BMI, haemoglobin, prior heart failure (HF) hospitalization, prior myocardial infarction/coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), and heart rate were identified as strong independent risk factors. Estimates from the model were converted into a simple integer risk score which was categorized into three groups of low-, medium-, and high risk. In placebo patients, the rates (per 100 patient-years) for the primary outcome were 7.6, 19.0, and 39.4 in the low-, medium-, and high-risk groups, respectively. On eplerenone, these rates were reduced to 5.6, 12.2, and 24.2, respectively. Eplerenone was beneficial across all risk categories and the hazard ratios were similar. The absolute treatment benefit was greatest among those at highest risk. Similar patterns emerged for all-cause mortality and for all HF hospitalizations.
CONCLUSION: This easy-to-use integer risk score should be of value in quantifying individual patient risk in patients with systolic HF and mild symptoms. The relative benefits of eplerenone appeared consistent across the whole spectrum of risk, including those at lower risk.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heart failure; Prognosis; Risk score

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23864130     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  21 in total

Review 1.  Eplerenone for hypertension.

Authors:  Tina Sc Tam; May Hy Wu; Sarah C Masson; Matthew P Tsang; Sarah N Stabler; Angus Kinkade; Anthony Tung; Aaron M Tejani
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-28

Review 2.  Pathophysiology and treatment of resistant hypertension: the role of aldosterone and amiloride-sensitive sodium channels.

Authors:  Eric K Judd; David A Calhoun; David G Warnock
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 5.299

Review 3.  Clinical effect of nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonists in the treatment of diabetic kidney disease: expectations as a new therapeutic strategy.

Authors:  Atsuhisa Sato; Mitsuhiro Nishimoto
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 5.528

Review 4.  Heart failure - what's new and what's changed?

Authors:  Paul D Callan; Andrew L Clark
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.659

Review 5.  Heart failure - what's new and what's changed?

Authors:  Paul D Callan; Andrew L Clark
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.659

Review 6.  Role of the vascular endothelial sodium channel activation in the genesis of pathologically increased cardiovascular stiffness.

Authors:  Michael A Hill; Frederic Jaisser; James R Sowers
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 10.787

7.  The prognostic value of plasma galectin-3 in chronic heart failure patients is maintained when treated with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists.

Authors:  François Koukoui; Franck Desmoulin; Michel Galinier; Manon Barutaut; Celine Caubère; Maria Francesca Evaristi; Gurbuz Murat; Rudolf De Boer; Matthieu Berry; Fatima Smih; Philippe Rouet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Insights into implementation of sacubitril/valsartan into clinical practice.

Authors:  Pieter Martens; Hanne Beliën; Matthias Dupont; Wilfried Mullens
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2018-02-21

9.  With great power comes great… reliability.

Authors:  Boback Ziaeian; Javed Butler; Gregg C Fonarow
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 17.349

Review 10.  Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist in heart failure: Past, present and future perspectives.

Authors:  Enrico Vizzardi; Valentina Regazzoni; Giorgio Caretta; Mara Gavazzoni; Edoardo Sciatti; Ivano Bonadei; Eleftheria Trichaki; Riccardo Raddino; Marco Metra
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vessel       Date:  2014-03-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.