Literature DB >> 23864003

Soybean leaf hydraulic conductance does not acclimate to growth at elevated [CO2] or temperature in growth chambers or in the field.

Anna M Locke1, Lawren Sack, Carl J Bernacchi, Donald R Ort.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Leaf hydraulic properties are strongly linked with transpiration and photosynthesis in many species. However, it is not known if gas exchange and hydraulics will have co-ordinated responses to climate change. The objective of this study was to investigate the responses of leaf hydraulic conductance (Kleaf) in Glycine max (soybean) to growth at elevated [CO2] and increased temperature compared with the responses of leaf gas exchange and leaf water status.
METHODS: Two controlled-environment growth chamber experiments were conducted with soybean to measure Kleaf, stomatal conductance (gs) and photosynthesis (A) during growth at elevated [CO2] and temperature relative to ambient levels. These results were validated with field experiments on soybean grown under free-air elevated [CO2] (FACE) and canopy warming. KEY
RESULTS: In chamber studies, Kleaf did not acclimate to growth at elevated [CO2], even though stomatal conductance decreased and photosynthesis increased. Growth at elevated temperature also did not affect Kleaf, although gs and A showed significant but inconsistent decreases. The lack of response of Kleaf to growth at increased [CO2] and temperature in chamber-grown plants was confirmed with field-grown soybean at a FACE facility.
CONCLUSIONS: Leaf hydraulic and leaf gas exchange responses to these two climate change factors were not strongly linked in soybean, although gs responded to [CO2] and increased temperature as previously reported. This differential behaviour could lead to an imbalance between hydraulic supply and transpiration demand under extreme environmental conditions likely to become more common as global climate continues to change.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glycine max; Leaf hydraulic conductance; climate change; elevated CO2; soybean; temperature; water potential

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23864003      PMCID: PMC3747797          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mct143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  25 in total

1.  Decreases in stomatal conductance of soybean under open-air elevation of [CO2] are closely coupled with decreases in ecosystem evapotranspiration.

Authors:  Carl J Bernacchi; Bruce A Kimball; Devin R Quarles; Stephen P Long; Donald R Ort
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 2.  Leaf hydraulics.

Authors:  Lawren Sack; N Michele Holbrook
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 26.379

3.  Internal coordination between hydraulics and stomatal control in leaves.

Authors:  Tim J Brodribb; Gregory J Jordan
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 7.228

4.  Water supply and demand remain balanced during leaf acclimation of Nothofagus cunninghamii trees.

Authors:  Timothy J Brodribb; Gregory J Jordan
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 10.151

5.  What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Ainsworth; Stephen P Long
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 10.151

6.  Interactive effects of elevated CO2 and temperature on water transport inponderosa pine.

Authors:  H Maherali; E H Delucia
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.844

7.  Temperature, light and leaf hydraulic conductance of little-leaf linden (Tilia cordata) in a mixed forest canopy.

Authors:  Arne Sellin; Priit Kupper
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.196

8.  Leaf maximum photosynthetic rate and venation are linked by hydraulics.

Authors:  Tim J Brodribb; Taylor S Feild; Gregory J Jordan
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 9.  Mesophyll diffusion conductance to CO2: an unappreciated central player in photosynthesis.

Authors:  Jaume Flexas; Margaret M Barbour; Oliver Brendel; Hernán M Cabrera; Marc Carriquí; Antonio Díaz-Espejo; Cyril Douthe; Erwin Dreyer; Juan P Ferrio; Jorge Gago; Alexander Gallé; Jeroni Galmés; Naomi Kodama; Hipólito Medrano; Ülo Niinemets; José J Peguero-Pina; Alicia Pou; Miquel Ribas-Carbó; Magdalena Tomás; Tiina Tosens; Charles R Warren
Journal:  Plant Sci       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 4.729

10.  Acclimation of leaf hydraulic conductance and stomatal conductance of Pinus taeda (loblolly pine) to long-term growth in elevated CO(2) (free-air CO(2) enrichment) and N-fertilization.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Domec; Sari Palmroth; Eric Ward; Chris A Maier; M Thérézien; Ram Oren
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 7.228

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  CO2 studies remain key to understanding a future world.

Authors:  Katie M Becklin; S Michael Walker; Danielle A Way; Joy K Ward
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 10.151

2.  Temperature acclimation of net photosynthesis and its underlying component processes in four tropical tree species.

Authors:  Maria Wittemann; Mats X Andersson; Bonaventure Ntirugulirwa; Lasse Tarvainen; Göran Wallin; Johan Uddling
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.561

3.  Increasing leaf hydraulic conductance with transpiration rate minimizes the water potential drawdown from stem to leaf.

Authors:  Kevin A Simonin; Emily Burns; Brendan Choat; Margaret M Barbour; Todd E Dawson; Peter J Franks
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 6.992

4.  How well do you know your growth chambers? Testing for chamber effect using plant traits.

Authors:  Christiana Evans-Fitz Gerald; Jennifer C McElwain; Charilaos Yiotis; Caroline Elliott-Kingston; Amanda S Porter
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 4.993

5.  Physiological and transcriptomic responses in the seed coat of field-grown soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) to abiotic stress.

Authors:  Courtney P Leisner; Craig R Yendrek; Elizabeth A Ainsworth
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.215

6.  Leaf hydraulic conductance declines in coordination with photosynthesis, transpiration and leaf water status as soybean leaves age regardless of soil moisture.

Authors:  Anna M Locke; Donald R Ort
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 6.992

7.  Impacts of CO2 elevation on the physiology and seed quality of soybean.

Authors:  Guowei Zheng; Jia Chen; Weiqi Li
Journal:  Plant Divers       Date:  2019-10-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.