Biphasic catalysis using amphiphilic polyphenols-chelated noble metals as highly active and selective catalysts.

In the field of catalysis, it is highly desired to develop novel catalysts that combine the advantages of both homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts. Here we disclose that the use of plant polyphenol as amphiphilic large molecule ligand/stabilizer allows for the preparation of noble metal complex and noble metal nanoparticle catalysts. These catalysts are found to be highly selective and active in aqueous-organic biphasic catalysis of cinnamaldehyde and quinoline, and can be reused at least 3 times without significant loss of activity. Moreover, the catalytic activity and reusability of the catalysts can be rationally controlled by simply adjusting the content of polyphenols in the catalysts. Our strategy may be extended to design a wide range of aqueous-organic biphasic catalysis system.

To date, more than 90% of the industrial processes are relied on catalysis, such as chemical, pharmaceutics, materials, polymers and energy. The development of new catalysts has been the most important issue in catalysis science. Conventionally, the catalysts are classified into two typical categories, the homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts123. Homogeneous catalysts are usually featured by high activity and high selectivity since homogeneous catalysts stay in the same phase as the reactants but the recovery of homogeneous catalysts from reaction media is extremely difficult and often requires tedious procedures45. Although heterogeneous catalysts provide convenient recovery of catalyst, the heterogenization of catalytic active species onto supporting matrices inevitably leads to loss of catalytic activity and/or selectivity owing to the strong interactions between supporting matrices and the catalytic active sites as well as the corresponding steric restriction678. Obviously, there is an acute need for developing new catalyst material that combines the advantages of both homogeneous (high activity and high selectivity) and heterogeneous catalysts (easy recovery and reusability).

In recent years, the concept of biphasic catalysis has attracted considerable attention and has emerged as promising strategy for developing catalysts with high activity and reusability91011. In biphasic catalysis system, the catalyst resides in aqueous phase and the substrate resides in the other phase, immiscible organic phase. Upon reactions, the two phases are vigorously stirred to allow interfacial interactions between aqueous phase (catalyst) and organic phase (substrate). Once the reaction is completed, the two phases separate by simple decantation, where the aqueous phase contains the catalyst and organic phase contains the product. In principle, the aqueous catalyst can be conveniently cycled many times with high catalytic turnover number (TON). However, it has proven to be very challenging to prevent the leaching of metal catalyst from aqueous phase to organic phase because the conventionally used ligands are small hydrophilic molecules that have limited stabilizing effect towards metal species, such as sulfonated phosphines121314. TPPTS [P(m-C6H4SO3Na)3] is one of the most commonly used sulfonated phosphine ligands, which is chelated with metal ions by phosphine and provides the catalyst hydrophilicity by sulfonic groups. However, TPPTS belongs to monodentate ligands with limited stabilizing ability to chelate metal ions, and the activity of TPPTS-chelated metal catalyst is usually found to substantially decrease during cycling because of the leaching of metal species into organic phase. Although some bidentate sulfonated phosphines have been synthesized in order to increase the chelating ability of this type of ligand, these synthetic ligands require complicated synthesis route, and often involve toxic solvent1516. Another challenging in developing biphasic system is to improve the mass transfer kinetics between two phases. The use of surfactant and phase transfer agent can substantially decrease the interfacial resistances while catalyst recycling would be quite difficult due to the ineffective phase separation caused by the use of surfactants1718. One possible solution to solve both of the above problems is to prepare aqueous catalysts using amphiphilic large molecules as the ligands. In principle, the use of large molecule as ligand can exhibit stronger stabilizing effect to the metal species compared to the small molecule ligands, and the amphiphilic nature of ligands can effectively decrease the interfacial resistances while without suffering the problems with phase separation192021. In this way, the as-designed catalysts can therefore exhibit high catalytic activity and good reusability in biphasic catalysis.

Here we attempt to use natural polymers as the ligands to replace the synthetic counterparts in order to provide a more environmentally benign and cost-effective methodology. Black wattle tannin (BWT), a kind of typical natural polyphenols extracted from plants, is used as bidentate ligand to chelate with metal ions. BWT is a mixture of poly-prodelphinidin with average molecular weight of 1250, and contains a large number of ortho-phenolic hydroxyls at its B rings, which provide BWT very excellent chelating ability and good water-solubility. The macromolecular backbone of BWT is composed of hydrophobic aromatic rings, which can interact with the hydrophobic substrate and/or organic phase by hydrophobic interactions2223. In this way, the interfacial resistances in biphasic catalysis can be substantially decreased by using BWT as amphiphilic ligand. In the present investigation, we first prepared highly active and recyclable noble metal complex (BWT-Rh3+ and BWT-Pd2+) and noble metal nanoparticle (BWT-PdNPs and BWT-RhNPs) catalysts by using polyphenols as amphiphilic large molecule ligands. Subsequently, the catalytic properties of the catalysts were evaluated in aqueous-organic biphasic hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde and quinoline, and the influences of experimental parameters on catalytic properties were also systematically investigated, such as polyphenol content, organic solvent, temperature and H2 pressure.

Results

A series of homogeneous BWT-Pd2+ complex catalysts were prepared by simply mixing different amount of BWT with PdCl2 aqueous solution, and the corresponding BWT-PdNPs catalysts were conveniently obtained by chemical reduction of BWT-Pd2+ complex at room temperature using NaBH4 as reductant (see detail in experiments section). Fig. 1(b) illustrates the chelating interactions between BWT and Pd2+ as well as the stabilizing mechanism of BWT towards PdNPs respectively. For the chelating reaction, two adjacent phenolic hydroxyls of BWT at B rings are first dissociated by releasing the protons, and then act as bidentate ligands to chelate with Pd2+, giving the formation of highly stable five-membered chelating ring. Based on XPS analysis, the O 1s XPS spectrum of BWT shows a major peak of phenolic oxygens at 531.8 eV while this peak is shifted to higher binding energy of 532.2 eV after chelating with BWT (Supplementary Fig. S1), suggesting the donation of electrons from phenolic hydroxyls of BWT to Pd2+. As for the BWT-PdNPs, the stabilizing effects of BWT to PdNPs are confirmed by FTIR spectroscopy analysis (Supplementary Fig. S2). Compared with pure BWT, the stretching vibration peak of phenolic hydroxyls is narrowed at 3400 cm−1 after stabilized with PdNPs, and the peaks belong to aromatic rings of BWT also become weak in the vicinity of 1614–1458 cm−1. These differences suggest that PdNPs are mainly stabilized by the phenolic hydroxyls of BWT. Based on TEM observation, the as-prepared BWT-PdNPs gel solution contains very small Pd nanoparticles with diameter of 2 ~ 3 nm (Supplementary Fig. S3).

Figure 1

Schematic illustration of preparation of polyphenols-chelated metal catalysts.

Hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde is employed as the probe reaction to evaluate the catalytic activity, selectivity and reusability of the as-prepared aqueous catalysts. Since cinnamaldehyde is α-β-unsaturated aldehyde that contains two unsaturated bonds in molecule, the hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde can generate different products. Fig. 2 illustrates the reaction pathways in hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde. The hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde in C = C bond can form hydrocinnamaldehyde (HCAL) while the hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde in C = O bond leads to the formation of cinnamyl alcohol (COL). Further hydrogenation of these two intermediates results in the formation of hydrocinnamyl alcohol (HCOL). Although the hydrogenation of C = C bond in α-β unsaturated aldehydes is both kinetically and thermodynamically more favorable than that of the C = O group24, the 100% selective hydrogenation of CAL to HCAL is quite difficult.

Figure 2

Hydrogenation of cinnamalydehyde.

Much to our delight, the selectivity of our BWT-Pd2+ and BWT-PdNPs catalysts both exhibit 100% of selectivity to HCAL, as shown in Table 1. As we know, the adsorption of substrate on the catalyst will significantly influence the catalytic reaction. We speculate that due to the strengthened hydrophobic interactions between aromatic backbone of BWT and aromatic rings of CAL, the preferred hydrogenation of C = C bond over C = O bond will be promoted due to its close distance with the aromatic ring of CAL. This effect accompanied with the intrinsic high reactivity of C = C hydrogenation, thus resulting in 100% selective hydrogenation of CAL to HCAL. We then screen the optimal conditions for CAL hydrogenation. The influence of solvent on catalytic activity is first investigated. As shown in Table 1 (Entry 1–3), when cyclohexane is used as the organic phase, the conversion yield of CAL is around 32.7% for BWT-Pd2+. By replace the organic phase to toluene and n-butanol, the corresponding conversion yields under the same experimental conditions are increased to 53.1% and 76.2%, respectively. It is likely that the use of organic solvent with higher polarization is more beneficial for the biphasic reaction to proceed. Such phenomenon is also confirmed when using BWT-PdNPs catalyst, where the corresponding conversion yields are 51.3%, 75.5% and 91.2%, respectively, when using cyclohexane, toluene and n-butanol as the organic phase, respectively. For both of our catalysts, the amphiphilic BWT molecules can not only interact with hydrophobic substrates by hydrophobic interactions but also exhibit affinity to polarized molecules by multiple hydrogen-bonding interactions. When the organic phase with stronger polarization is employed, the phenolic hydroxyls of BWT may form hydrogen bond with the polarized partition of organic solvent like the hydroxyl oxygen of n-butanol, which further increase the contact chance of catalyst to the substrate dissolved in the organic solvent. Catalytic reaction carried out at high pressure may lead to deep hydrogenation of CAL to HCOL. To reveal that both of our catalysts are highly selective to HCAL, the biphasic reaction is conducted at even higher H2 pressure of 3.0 and 4.0 MPa. In Table 1, entry 4–5, the BWT-Pd2+ and BWT-PdNPs catalysts still exhibit substantially increased conversion yield of substrate due to the increase of dissolved H2 in solvent at high pressure. However, no other product, such as HCOL, is detected, and the selectivity to HCAL is still 100%. These facts suggest that the selectivity of our catalysts should be mainly derived from their intrinsic thermodynamically properties rather than the controlling of catalytic parameters. In Table 1 Entry 6–11, the increase of reaction temperature from 303–363K promotes the activity of both catalysts. The conversion yield of substrate over BWT-Pd2+ is increased from 3.2% to 77.3%, and that over BWT-PdNPs is increased from 9.1% to 93.5%. The influence of BWT content on the catalytic activity of the catalysts is also investigated in detail. As shown in Table 1, Entry 11–15, the increase of BWT content causes an obvious decrease of activity, where the conversion yield of substrate is decreased from 91.3% to 3.3% when the dosage of BWT in the BWT-Pd2+ catalyst is changed from 2 to 60 mg. Similar tendency is also observed for BWT-PdNPs catalyst. The corresponding conversion yield of substrate is decreased from 95.7% to 10.1% when the dosage of BWT in the BWT-PdNPs is increased from 2 to 60 mg. According to the literatures2526, when ligands are chelated with metal species or stabilize with metal nanoparticles, the molecular structure of ligands will inevitably cause some extent of steric hindrance, and such influence is found to be more severe for those ligands with large molecular structure. As for BWT, it contains a large rigid aromatic backbone that causes steric hindrance to the catalysts. At high content of BWT, such hindrance effect can be intensively strengthened via the formation of hydrogen bonds and/or hydrophobic bonds among BWT molecules, and a dense supramolecular shell may be formed around the active metal species, which restrict the access of substrates to catalytic active sites, resulting in loss of activity as observed in Table 1, Entry 11–15. Although the increase of BWT content leads to the loss of catalyst activity, it can increase the cycling stability of the catalyst.

Table 1

Condition screening* in aqueous-organic biphasic hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde using BWT-Pd2+ and BWT-PdNPs catalysts

Entry	Solvent	Temp. (K)	Pressure (MPa)	BWT (mg)	Product	Selectivity (%)	TOF of BWT-Pd2+ (mol·mol−1 ·h−1)	TOF of BWT-PdNPs (mol·mol−1 ·h−1)
1	Cyclohexane	353	2.0	15.0	HCAL	100	81.75	128.25
2	Toluene	353	2.0	15.0	HCAL	100	132.75	188.75
3	n-butanol	353	2.0	15.0	HCAL	100	190.5	228
4	n-butanol	353	3.0	15.0	HCAL	100	198.5	233.75
5	n-butanol	353	4.0	15.0	HCAL	100	203.25	238.75
6	n-butanol	303	2.0	15.0	HCAL	100	8	22.75
7	n-butanol	313	2.0	15.0	HCAL	100	26.5	43.25
8	n-butanol	323	2.0	15.0	HCAL	100	48	71.75
9	n-butanol	333	2.0	15.0	HCAL	100	85.25	113.25
10	n-butanol	343	2.0	15.0	HCAL	100	129.25	159.5
11	n-butanol	363	2.0	15.0	HCAL	100	193.25	233.75
12	n-butanol	353	2.0	2.0	HCAL	100	228.25	239.25
13	n-butanol	353	2.0	5.0	HCAL	100	214.25	232.75
14	n-butanol	353	2.0	30.0	HCAL	100	75.25	143.25
15	n-butanol	353	2.0	60.0	HCAL	100	8.25	25.25

*Pd: 10.0 μmol, Cinnamalydehyde: 1.25 mmol, Reaction time: 30 min.

As shown in Table 2, for both BWT-Pd2+ and BWT-PdNPs catalysts, their reusability is improved along with the increase of BWT content. For the hydrogenation of CAL over BWT-Pd2+, as an example, when the content of BWT is 5 mg in the catalyst, the conversion yield of substrate is decreased from 85.7% to 54.3% after cycled from 1-run to 5-run. By increasing the BWT content to 15 mg, the conversion yield of substrate in 5-run (73.6%) is still comparable to that in 1-run (76.2%). Further increasing the BWT content to 30 mg, the catalyst also shows quite well cycling stability. Similar phenomenon is still observed for the BWT-PdNPs catalyst. To further confirm such influence of BWT to the reusability of the catalyst. The biphasic hydrogenation of quinoline is conducted over BWT-Pd2+ and BWT-PdNPs catalysts, respectively. Similarly, the low content of BWT in catalyst can result in quite high catalytic activity in the 1-run but a substantial decrease of conversion yield is observed in the following cycles. By increasing the content of BWT to a proper amount, such as 15 mg, appreciable high activity and satisfied reusability can be achieved. It should also be noted that 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline (py-THQ) is the only catalytic product of quinoline, and there is no 5,6,7,8-tetrahydroquinoline (bz-THQ) or decahydroquinoline (DHQ) detected in the reaction. Compared with most of the previous researches, our catalysts show obvious advantages both in activity and reusability. For example, Melean and coworkers applied hydrosoluble complexes [Rh(CO)(Pz)(TPPTS)]2 (TPPTS = triphenylphosphine-trisulfonated) in biphasic hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde27. When the biphasic reaction was conducted at 343 K for 24 h using cetyl-trimethylammonium chloride as the phase transfer agent, the conversion yield of cinnamaldehyde is only 55% in the 1-run, and the conversion yield shows an obvious decrease during cycling. In the 5-run, conversion yield of cinnamaldehyde is as low as ~40%.

Table 2

Reusability of BWT-Pd2+ and BWT-PdNPs in aqueous-organic biphasic hydrogenation of cinnamalydehyde and quinoline

		Hydrogenation of CALa		Hydrogenation of quinolineb
Catalyst	BWT (mg)	TOF (mol·mol−1 ·h−1) in Run-1	TOF (mol·mol−1 ·h−1) in Run-5	TOF (mol·mol−1 ·h−1) in Run-1	TOF (mol·mol−1 ·h−1) in Run-3
BWT-Pd2+	5	214.25	135.75	225.25	163.75
	15	190.5	184	215.25	208.25
	30	75.25	69.25	96.75	93
BWT-PdNPs	5	231.25	142.25	245.75	177.75
	15	225.75	210.25	240	234
	30	81	74.75	152.25	147.5

aPd: 10.0 μmol, Cinnamalydehyde: 1.25 mmol, Solvent: n-butanol, Temperature: 353 K, Pressure: 2.0 MPa, Reaction time: 30 min, 100% selectivity to HCAL.

bPd: 50.0 μmol, Quinoline: 5 mmol, Solvent: n-butanol, Temperature: 353 K, Pressure: 2.0 MPa, Reaction time: 30 min, 100% selectivity to py-THQ.

In principle, our strategy for the synthesis of BWT-Pd2+ and BWT-PdNPs catalysts can extend to synthesize other noble metal catalyst because BWT has strong chelating ability towards most of the transition metal ions with d-orbits2829. To demonstrate this, we prepared BWT-Rh3+ and BWT-RhNPs catalysts. The chelating interactions between BWT and Rh3+ are first confirmed by UV-vis (Supplementary Fig. S4) and HNMR analyses (Supplementary Fig. S5), and the formation of RhNPs is verified by TEM image (Supplementary Fig. S6). Subsequently, the BWT-Rh3+ and BWT-RhNPs are employed as catalysts in biphasic hydrogenation of CAL. As shown in Table 3, the BWT-Rh3+ complexes exhibit high activity and selectivity in biphasic hydrogenation of CAL. HCAL is the only product with 100% selectivity. For BWT-Rh3+ catalyst, its average turnover frequency (TOF) value is as high as 471.0 mol·mol−1·h−1 in the 1-run. In the 2-run, the average TOF is still high up to 459.0 mol·mol−1·h−1. In the 5-run, the average TOF is 435.0 mol·mol−1·h−1, retaining 92.36% catalytic activity of the 1-run. For biphasic hydrogenation of quinoline over BWT-RhNPs catalyst, the average TOF in the 1-run is 163 mol·mol−1·h−1, and this value is still kept at 157 mol·mol−1·h−1 in the 3-run, also showing no significant loss of activity during cycling. We also performed biphasic hydrogenation of quinoline over commercial RhCl(CO)(TPPTS)2 catalyst purchased from Sigma-Aldrich cooperation. When the biphasic hydrogenation was conducted at 363 K, the TOF of RhCl(CO)(TPPTS)2 is 92.6 mol·mol−1·h−1, only counting for 56.81% TOF of the BWT-RhNPs catalyst.

Table 3

Aqueous-organic biphasic hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde by BWT-Rh3+,a and biphasic hydrogenation of quinoline by BWT-RhNPsb

Catalyst	Cycle	Time (min)	Product	Selectivity (%)	TOF (mol·mol−1 ·h−1)
BWT-Rh3+	1	30.0	HCAL	100	471.0
	2	30.0	HCAL	100	459.0
	5	30.0	HCAL	100	435.0
BWT-RhNPs	1	30.0	py-THQ	100	163
	3	30.0	py-THQ	100	157

aRh: 5.0 μmol Rh, Cinnamalydehyde: 1.25 mmol, Solvent: n-butanol, Temperature: 353 K, Pressure: 2.0 MPa, Reaction time: 30 min.

bRh: 5.0 μmol Rh, quinoline: 0.5 mmol act as organic phase, Temperature: 353 K, Pressure: 2.0 MPa, Reaction time: 30 min.

Discussion

In conclusion, we have reported a systematic study, in which plant polyphenols were used as amphiphilic large molecule ligands to synthesize a class of complex and nanoparticle catalysts. The ortho-phenolic hydroxyls of polyphenols are chelated with transition metal ions to form noble metal complexes catalysts. The rigid aromatic backbone of polyphenols provides steric hindrance to metal nanoparticles, ensuring good stability. More importantly, the amphiphilic nature of polyphenols affords the as-prepared catalysts high activity and reusability in biphasic hydrogenation reactions, and the catalytic activity and reusability of the catalysts can be rationally controlled by simply adjusting the content of polyphenols in the catalysts. Our further work will focus on the synthesis of polyphenols-stabilized bimetallic nanocatalysts, and their applications in biphasic catalytic reactions.

Methods

Preparation of BWT-Pd2+ and BWT-PdNPs catalysts

10 μmol (or 50 μmol) Pd2+ was dissolved into 3.0 mL of deionized water, and then different amounts of BWT (2 mg, 5 mg, 15 mg, 30 mg and 60 mg) were added to the Pd2+ solution, followed by constant stirring for 20 min. The resultant solution is BWT-Pd2+ complexes catalyst. BWT-PdNPs catalysts were prepared by reducing the above BWT-Pd2+ complexes catalysts using 5.0 mL of 0.010 g NaBH4 aqueous solution.

Preparation of BWT-Rh3+ and BWT-RhNPs catalysts

5 μmol Rh3+ was dissolved into 3.0 mL of deionized water, and then 15 mg of BWT was added to the Rh3+ solution, followed by constant stirring for 20 min. The resultant solution is BWT-Rh3+ complexes catalyst. BWT- RhNPs catalysts were prepared by reducing the above BWT-Rh3+ complexes catalysts using 5.0 mL of 0.010 g NaBH4 aqueous solution.

Characterization and biphasic hydrogenation

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) of BWT and BWT-Pd were carried out using a VG Scientific ESCALAB 200 instrument. The morphology of nanoparticles were determined using Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM, Tecnai G2 F20 S-TWIN, U.S.) operated at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. Fourier Transform Infrared spectoscopy (FT-IR) of BWT and BWT-Pd were tested by Nicolet 6700 instrument. The UV-vis spectra of BWT and BWT-Rh3+ were measured by UV-3600 UV-vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu.Japan). Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (HNMR) was measured by Bruker DPX400 NMR instrument using DMSO-das solvent.

Biphasic hydrogenation was conducted by adding desired amount of catalyst solution and substrate dissolved in organic solvent (or just substrate) into a stainless steel reactor. After the reactor was flushed three times with H2, catalytic hydrogenation was conducted under constant H2 pressure and temperature. When the reaction was completed, the organic phase was collected by decantation and analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) while the aqueous phase was then reused. The turnover frequency (TOF) of the catalyst in the hydrogenation experiments was calculated using the following equation:

Author Contributions

H.M. and X.L. conceived the idea. H.M. carried out materials fabrication. H.M., H.Y. and J.C. performed materials characterizations. H.M. conducted the catalytic reactions. H.M. and X.L. drafted the manuscript. All authors analyzed and discussed the experimental results.