Bethany Barone Gibbs1, Jared P Reis, Erik B Schelbert, Lynette L Craft, Steve Sidney, Joao Lima, Cora E Lewis. 1. 1University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; 2National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD; 3Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; 4Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, CA; 5Johns Hopkins Institutes of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; and 6University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Sedentary screen time (watching TV or using a computer) predicts cardiovascular outcomes independently from moderate and vigorous physical activity and could affect left ventricular structure and function through the adverse consequences of sedentary behavior. PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine whether sedentary screen time is associated with measures of left ventricular structure and function. METHODS: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study measured screen time by questionnaire and left ventricular structure and function by echocardiography in 2854 black and white participants, age 43-55 yr, in 2010-2011. Generalized linear models evaluated cross-sectional trends for echocardiography measures across higher categories of screen time and adjusting for demographics, smoking, alcohol, and physical activity. Further models adjusted for potential intermediate factors (blood pressure, antihypertensive medication use, diabetes, and body mass index). RESULTS: The relationship between screen time and left ventricular mass (LVM) differed in blacks versus whites. Among whites, higher screen time was associated with larger LVM (P < 0.001), after adjustment for height, demographics, and lifestyle variables. Associations between screen time and LVM persisted when adjusting for blood pressure, antihypertensive medication use, and diabetes (P = 0.008) but not with additional adjustment for body mass index (P = 0.503). Similar relationships were observed for screen time with LVM indexed to height, relative wall thickness, and mass-to-volume ratio. Screen time was not associated with left ventricular structure among blacks or left ventricular function in either race group. CONCLUSIONS: Sedentary screen time is associated with greater LVM in white adults, and this relationship was largely explained by higher overall adiposity. The lack of association in blacks supports a potential qualitative difference in the cardiovascular consequences of sedentary screen-based behavior.
INTRODUCTION: Sedentary screen time (watching TV or using a computer) predicts cardiovascular outcomes independently from moderate and vigorous physical activity and could affect left ventricular structure and function through the adverse consequences of sedentary behavior. PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine whether sedentary screen time is associated with measures of left ventricular structure and function. METHODS: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study measured screen time by questionnaire and left ventricular structure and function by echocardiography in 2854 black and white participants, age 43-55 yr, in 2010-2011. Generalized linear models evaluated cross-sectional trends for echocardiography measures across higher categories of screen time and adjusting for demographics, smoking, alcohol, and physical activity. Further models adjusted for potential intermediate factors (blood pressure, antihypertensive medication use, diabetes, and body mass index). RESULTS: The relationship between screen time and left ventricular mass (LVM) differed in blacks versus whites. Among whites, higher screen time was associated with larger LVM (P < 0.001), after adjustment for height, demographics, and lifestyle variables. Associations between screen time and LVM persisted when adjusting for blood pressure, antihypertensive medication use, and diabetes (P = 0.008) but not with additional adjustment for body mass index (P = 0.503). Similar relationships were observed for screen time with LVM indexed to height, relative wall thickness, and mass-to-volume ratio. Screen time was not associated with left ventricular structure among blacks or left ventricular function in either race group. CONCLUSIONS: Sedentary screen time is associated with greater LVM in white adults, and this relationship was largely explained by higher overall adiposity. The lack of association in blacks supports a potential qualitative difference in the cardiovascular consequences of sedentary screen-based behavior.
Authors: Roberto M Lang; Michelle Bierig; Richard B Devereux; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Patricia A Pellikka; Michael H Picard; Mary J Roman; James Seward; Jack S Shanewise; Scott D Solomon; Kirk T Spencer; Martin St John Sutton; William J Stewart Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Bronwyn K Clark; Takemi Sugiyama; Genevieve N Healy; Jo Salmon; David W Dunstan; Neville Owen Journal: Obes Rev Date: 2008-07-08 Impact factor: 9.213
Authors: Genevieve N Healy; Katrien Wijndaele; David W Dunstan; Jonathan E Shaw; Jo Salmon; Paul Z Zimmet; Neville Owen Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2007-11-13 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Peter M Okin; Richard B Devereux; Sverker Jern; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stevo Julius; Markku S Nieminen; Steven Snapinn; Katherine E Harris; Peter Aurup; Jonathan M Edelman; Hans Wedel; Lars H Lindholm; Björn Dahlöf Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-11-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Giovanni de Simone; Stephen R Daniels; Thomas R Kimball; Mary J Roman; Carmela Romano; Marcello Chinali; Maurizio Galderisi; Richard B Devereux Journal: Hypertension Date: 2004-11-22 Impact factor: 9.897
Authors: Michael J LaMonte; Joseph C Larson; JoAnn E Manson; John Bellettiere; Cora E Lewis; Andrea Z LaCroix; Jennifer W Bea; Karen C Johnson; Liviu Klein; Corinna A Noel; Marcia L Stefanick; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Charles B Eaton Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2020-11-24 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Daisuke Kamimura; Paul D Loprinzi; Wanmei Wang; Takeki Suzuki; Kenneth R Butler; Thomas H Mosley; Michael E Hall Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Rodney P Joseph; Dori Pekmezi; Gareth R Dutton; Andrea L Cherrington; Young-Il Kim; Jeroan J Allison; Nefertiti H Durant Journal: J Transcult Nurs Date: 2014-06-16 Impact factor: 1.959
Authors: Bethany Barone Gibbs; Andrea L Hergenroeder; Peter T Katzmarzyk; I-Min Lee; John M Jakicic Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Keith M Diaz; John N Booth; Samantha R Seals; Steven P Hooker; Mario Sims; Patricia M Dubbert; Paul Muntner; Daichi Shimbo Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2016-03-01 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Andrea Z LaCroix; Eileen Rillamas-Sun; David Buchner; Kelly R Evenson; Chongzhi Di; I-Min Lee; Steve Marshall; Michael J LaMonte; Julie Hunt; Lesley Fels Tinker; Marcia Stefanick; Cora E Lewis; John Bellettiere; Amy H Herring Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-02-14 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Fei Qin; Yiqing Song; George P Nassis; Lina Zhao; Yanan Dong; Cuicui Zhao; Yiwei Feng; Jiexiu Zhao Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-07-17 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Neela D Thangada; Kershaw V Patel; Bradley Peden; Vijay Agusala; Julia Kozlitina; Sonia Garg; Mark H Drazner; Colby Ayers; Jarett D Berry; Ambarish Pandey Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-02-22 Impact factor: 5.501