Literature DB >> 23863456

A retrospective review of patients with stage IB2 cervical cancer treated with radical radiation versus radical surgery as a primary modality.

Kellie Alleyne-Mike1, Leon van Wijk, Alistair Hunter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the efficacy of treatment modalities in patients with stage IB2 cervical cancer treated at Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study of patients with stage IB2 cervical cancer treated from 1993 to 2008 with either primary radiotherapy, (with or without follow-on hysterectomy) or primary surgery (with or without adjuvant radiotherapy). Weekly cisplatin given concurrently with radiotherapy was used since 2003. Patient outcomes and grade 3 to grade 4 treatment-related toxicities were recorded.
RESULTS: The study included 78 eligible patients for whom the 5-year overall survival rate was 70.8%. Overall 5-year survival rate by treatment modality was 88% for the 25 patients in the surgery group and 62.5% for the 53 patients in the radiotherapy group. There was a marked difference in the proportion of patients in each group receiving additional therapy: 88% of patients in the primary surgery group had adjuvant radiotherapy, whereas only 5.7% of patients in the primary radiotherapy group went on to have a hysterectomy. Grade 3 to grade 4 toxicity was found in 13.2% of the radiotherapy group versus 4% of the surgery group (P = 0.4).
CONCLUSION: The optimal primary treatment for stage IB2 cervical cancer remains unclear. Both types of primary treatments were found to be feasible therapeutic approaches. Primary surgery seems to have better survival outcomes at our institution. Selection bias including a larger median tumor size in the radiotherapy group and inadequate concurrent chemotherapy (≤3 cycles) in 58% of the patients receiving primary radiotherapy probably accounted for the difference in survival.Thus, primary concurrent chemoradiation is being increasingly used for these patients at our institution in an effort to decrease bimodal treatment and limit the potential for increased toxicity and treatment costs. Evidence from a randomized controlled study is needed to determine the optimal treatment for stage IB2 cervical cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23863456     DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31829fb834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  5 in total

Review 1.  Type II or type III radical hysterectomy compared to chemoradiotherapy as a primary intervention for stage IB2 cervical cancer.

Authors:  Vivek Nama; Georgios Angelopoulos; Jeremy Twigg; John B Murdoch; Jo Bailey; Theresa A Lawrie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-12

2.  Practice guidelines for management of cervical cancer in Korea: a Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology Consensus Statement.

Authors:  Myong Cheol Lim; Maria Lee; Seung Hyuk Shim; Eun Ji Nam; Jung Yun Lee; Hyun Jung Kim; Yoo Young Lee; Kwang Beom Lee; Jeong Yeol Park; Yun Hwan Kim; Kyung Do Ki; Yong Jung Song; Hyun Hoon Chung; Sunghoon Kim; Jeong Won Lee; Jae Weon Kim; Duk Soo Bae; Jong Min Lee
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 3.  Cervical cancer prevention and treatment research in Africa: a systematic review from a public health perspective.

Authors:  Sarah Finocchario-Kessler; Catherine Wexler; May Maloba; Natabhona Mabachi; Florence Ndikum-Moffor; Elizabeth Bukusi
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 2.809

4.  From prospective biobanking to precision medicine: BIO-RAIDs - an EU study protocol in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Charlotte Ngo; Sanne Samuels; Ksenia Bagrintseva; Andrea Slocker; Philippe Hupé; Gemma Kenter; Marina Popovic; Nina Samet; Patricia Tresca; Heiko von der Leyen; Eric Deutsch; Roman Rouzier; Lisa Belin; Maud Kamal; Suzy Scholl
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy combined with intracavitary brachytherapy in early-stage cervical cancer patients with intermediate risk factors.

Authors:  Hao Yu; Linlin Zhang; Xuelian Du; Xiugui Sheng
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 4.147

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.