BACKGROUND: Poor sleep, common during pregnancy, is associated with negative health risks. The study aimed to identify predictors of clinically significant insomnia among pregnant Latinas. METHODS: A total of 1289 pregnant Latinas recruited from obstetric clinics completed the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) and questions about demographics and sleep. RESULTS: Clinically significant insomnia (ISI≥10) was present among 17% of participants. Significant correlates of clinically significant insomnia were higher scores on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) after removing the sleep item (47% of women with EPDS≥9 and 9% with EPDS<9), completing measures in English (rather than Spanish: 26% versus 13%), and income but not pregnancy week, age, highest education level, or marital status. The highest percentage of clinically significant insomnia (59%) was experienced by women with EPDS≥9 who completed measures in English. The lowest percentage of clinically significant insomnia (6.2%) was experienced by women with EPDS<9 who completed measures in Spanish. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of low-income, mostly Spanish-speaking pregnant Latinas, rates of clinically significant insomnia appear to be higher than rates among nonpregnant Latinas. Rates of clinically significant insomnia are particularly high among Latinas with elevated depressive symptom severity, a known risk for insomnia. Acculturation, as indicated by completing measures in English, may be another risk specific to Latinas, possibly owing to loss of some ethnicity-specific protective factors (e.g., social support, strong family ties, and group identity). It will be important to directly test this explanation in future research.
BACKGROUND: Poor sleep, common during pregnancy, is associated with negative health risks. The study aimed to identify predictors of clinically significant insomnia among pregnant Latinas. METHODS: A total of 1289 pregnant Latinas recruited from obstetric clinics completed the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) and questions about demographics and sleep. RESULTS: Clinically significant insomnia (ISI≥10) was present among 17% of participants. Significant correlates of clinically significant insomnia were higher scores on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) after removing the sleep item (47% of women with EPDS≥9 and 9% with EPDS<9), completing measures in English (rather than Spanish: 26% versus 13%), and income but not pregnancy week, age, highest education level, or marital status. The highest percentage of clinically significant insomnia (59%) was experienced by women with EPDS≥9 who completed measures in English. The lowest percentage of clinically significant insomnia (6.2%) was experienced by women with EPDS<9 who completed measures in Spanish. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of low-income, mostly Spanish-speaking pregnant Latinas, rates of clinically significant insomnia appear to be higher than rates among nonpregnant Latinas. Rates of clinically significant insomnia are particularly high among Latinas with elevated depressive symptom severity, a known risk for insomnia. Acculturation, as indicated by completing measures in English, may be another risk specific to Latinas, possibly owing to loss of some ethnicity-specific protective factors (e.g., social support, strong family ties, and group identity). It will be important to directly test this explanation in future research.
Authors: Michele L Okun; James F Luther; Stephen R Wisniewski; Dorothy Sit; Beth A Prairie; Katherine L Wisner Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2011-10-03 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: M Manconi; V Govoni; A De Vito; N T Economou; E Cesnik; I Casetta; G Mollica; L Ferini-Strambi; E Granieri Journal: Neurology Date: 2004-09-28 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: David A Kalmbach; Philip Cheng; Louise M O'Brien; Leslie M Swanson; Roopina Sangha; Srijan Sen; Constance Guille; Andrea Cuamatzi-Castelan; Alasdair L Henry; Thomas Roth; Christopher L Drake Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2020-03-21 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: Kimberly L D'Anna-Hernandez; Esmeralda Garcia; Mary Coussons-Read; Mark L Laudenslager; Randal G Ross Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2016-02
Authors: Maristella Lucchini; Louise M O'Brien; Linda G Kahn; Patricia A Brennan; Kelly Glazer Baron; Emily A Knapp; Claudia Lugo-Candelas; Lauren Shuffrey; Galit Levi Dunietz; Yeyi Zhu; Rosalind J Wright; Robert O Wright; Cristiane Duarte; Margaret R Karagas; Pakkay Ngai; Thomas G O'Connor; Julie B Herbstman; Sean Dioni; Anne Marie Singh; Carmela Alcantara; William P Fifer; Amy J Elliott Journal: Sleep Date: 2022-09-08 Impact factor: 6.313
Authors: Lianne M Tomfohr-Madsen; Tavis S Campbell; Gerald F Giesbrecht; Nicole L Letourneau; Linda E Carlson; Joshua W Madsen; Sona Dimidjian Journal: Trials Date: 2016-10-13 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Magdalena Smyka; Katarzyna Kosińska-Kaczyńska; Nicole Sochacki-Wójcicka; Magdalena Zgliczyńska; Mirosław Wielgoś Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-07-23 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Bei Bei; Donna M Pinnington; Nina Quin; Lin Shen; Michelle Blumfield; Joshua F Wiley; Sean P A Drummond; Louise K Newman; Rachel Manber Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2021-07-07 Impact factor: 7.723