| Literature DB >> 23861989 |
Sirada Kaocharoen1, Popchai Ngamskulrungroj, Carolina Firacative, Luciana Trilles, Dumrongdej Piyabongkarn, Wijit Banlunara, Natteewan Poonwan, Angkana Chaiprasert, Wieland Meyer, Ariya Chindamporn.
Abstract
To gain a more detailed picture of cryptococcosis in Thailand, a retrospective study of 498 C. neoformans and C. gattii isolates has been conducted. Among these, 386, 83 and 29 strains were from clinical, environmental and veterinary sources, respectively. A total of 485 C. neoformans and 13 C. gattii strains were studied. The majority of the strains (68.9%) were isolated from males (mean age of 37.97 years), 88.5% of C. neoformans and only 37.5% of C. gattii strains were from HIV patients. URA5-RFLP and/or M13 PCR-fingerprinting analysis revealed that the majority of the isolates were C. neoformans molecular type VNI regardless of their sources (94.8%; 94.6% of the clinical, 98.8% of the environmental and 86.2% of the veterinary isolates). In addition, the molecular types VNII (2.4%; 66.7% of the clinical and 33.3% of the veterinary isolates), VNIV (0.2%; 100% environmental isolate), VGI (0.2%; 100% clinical isolate) and VGII (2.4%; 100% clinical isolates) were found less frequently. Multilocus Sequence Type (MLST) analysis using the ISHAM consensus MLST scheme for the C. neoformans/C. gattii species complex identified a total of 20 sequence types (ST) in Thailand combining current and previous data. The Thai isolates are an integrated part of the global cryptococcal population genetic structure, with ST30 for C. gattii and ST82, ST83, ST137, ST141, ST172 and ST173 for C. neoformans being unique to Thailand. Most of the C. gattii isolates were ST7 = VGIIb, which is identical to the less virulent minor Vancouver island outbreak genotype, indicating Thailand as a stepping stone in the global spread of this outbreak strain. The current study revealed a greater genetic diversity and a wider range of major molecular types being present amongst Thai cryptococcal isolates than previously reported.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23861989 PMCID: PMC3701708 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002297
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Distribution of the major molecular types among strains ofCryptococcus neoformans and C. gattii from different sources in Thailand.
| Source | Molecular type | Total | ||||
| VNI | VNII | VNIV | VGI | VGII | ||
|
| 365 (94.6%) | 8 (2.1%) | 0 | 1 (0.3%) | 12 (3.1%) | 386 |
|
| 82 (98.8%) | 0 | 1 (1.2%) | 0 | 0 | 83 |
|
| 25 (86.2%) | 4 (13.8%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution of the M13 types among Thai VNI isolates.
| M13 type | Frequency |
| A | 426 (90.3%) |
| B | 1 (0.2%) |
| C | 3 (0.6%) |
| D | 9 (1.9%) |
| E | 1 (0.2) |
| F | 32 (6.8%) |
|
|
|
Allele types and sequence types of selected Thai cryptococcal isolates.
| Strain name | Mol. type | Source | M13 type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ST |
| 47-2158 | VGII | Human | ND | 2 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 15 | 2 |
|
| 47-4995 | VGII | Human | ND | 2 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 15 | 2 |
|
| 47-5055 | VGII | Human | ND | 2 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 15 | 2 |
|
| 47-5061 | VGII | Human | ND | 2 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 15 | 2 |
|
| DMST20763 | VGII | Human | ND | 2 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 15 | 2 |
|
| DMST20764 | VGII | Human | ND | 2 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 15 | 2 |
|
| DMST20765 | VGII | Human | ND | 2 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 15 | 2 |
|
| DMST20766 | VGII | Human | ND | 2 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 15 | 2 |
|
| DMST20767 | VGII | Human | ND | 2 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 15 | 2 |
|
| DMST20768 | VGII | Human | ND | 2 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 15 | 2 |
|
| MC-S-265 | VGII | Human | ND | 2 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 15 | 2 |
|
| MC-S-115 | VGII | Human | ND | 2 | 6 | 32 | 4 | 2 | 15 | 2 |
|
| A13 | VNI | Animal | A | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 |
| B1 | VNI | Human | A | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 |
| C110 | VNI | Human | A | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 |
| C121 | VNI | Human | A | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 |
| E1 | VNI | Environment | A | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 |
| P17 | VNI | Human | A | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 |
| P4 | VNI | Human | A | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 |
| A25 | VNI | Animal | A | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| B59 | VNI | Human | A | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| CM1 | VNI | Human | A | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| CM19 | VNI | Environment | A | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| S24 | VNI | Human | A | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| T28 | VNI | Environment | A | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| C146 | VNI | Human | A | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
|
| A19 | VNI | Animal | B | 1 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
|
| A17 | VNI | Animal | C | 1 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
|
| A18 | VNI | Animal | C | 1 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
|
| S87 | VNI | Human | D | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 |
|
| E12 | VNI | Environment | D | 1 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
|
| B31 | VNI | Human | E | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 |
| B2 | VNI | Human | F | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| CM17 | VNI | Human | F | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| E38 | VNI | Environment | F | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| C140 | VNI | Human | F | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 81 |
| 47-1104 | VNII | Human | ND | 2 | 9 | 14 | 8 | 11 | 12 | 4 |
|
| 47-7559 | VNII | Human | ND | 2 | 9 | 14 | 8 | 11 | 12 | 4 |
|
| 48-1350 | VNII | Human | ND | 2 | 9 | 14 | 8 | 11 | 12 | 4 |
|
| 48-1398 | VNII | Human | ND | 2 | 9 | 14 | 8 | 11 | 12 | 4 |
|
| 48-1643 | VNII | Human | ND | 2 | 9 | 14 | 8 | 11 | 12 | 4 |
|
| 48-1663 | VNII | Human | ND | 2 | 9 | 14 | 8 | 11 | 12 | 4 |
|
| 46-2852 | VNII | Human | ND | 8 | 10 | 15 | 8 | 12 | 3 | 11 |
|
| 48-2323 | VNII | Human | ND | 2 | 9 | 14 | 8 | 11 | 11 | 4 |
|
| A10 | VNII | Animal | ND | 2 | 9 | 14 | 8 | 11 | 11 | 4 |
|
| A11 | VNII | Animal | ND | 2 | 9 | 14 | 8 | 11 | 11 | 4 |
|
| A5 | VNII | Animal | ND | 2 | 9 | 14 | 11 | 11 | 16 | 15 | 172 |
| A6 | VNII | Animal | ND | 2 | 9 | 14 | 11 | 11 | 16 | 15 | 172 |
| CBS7816 | VNIV | Environment | ND | 17 | 21 | 28 | 19 | 14 | 1 | 20 |
|
ND = not done, ST = sequence type, Mol. = molecular, bold = new ST types of Thai isolates identified in this study.
Figure 1Phylogram of the ThaiC. neoformans isolates.
Phylogram depicting the genetic relationships between the Thai C. neoformans isolates based on neighbor joining analysis of the concatenated seven ISHAM consensus MLST loci using the program MEGA 5.03. Bold numbers on the branches indicate bootstrap support above 75%. Underlined strain numbers indicate STs identified in a previous study [33]. C = clinical, E = environmental, V = veterinary.
Figure 2Gene network placing the ThaiC. neoformans isolates in global context.
Gene network constructed from all C. neoformans ST types identified by MLST analysis in the current study in-cooperating the STs previously obtained from Thai cryptococcal isolates [33] and standard strains based on the combined seven ISHAM consensus MLST loci using the program Network 4.5.1.6, showing the close relationships between STs present in Thailand and globally.
Figure 3Phylogram of the ThaiC. gattii isolates.
Phylogram depicting the genetic relationships between the Thai C. gattii isolates based on neighbor joining analysis of the concatenated seven ISHAM consensus MLST loci using the program MEGA 5.03. Bold numbers on the branches indicate bootstrap support above 75%. C = clinical, E = environmental.