Literature DB >> 2386116

Management of complications associated with a first-generation endocardial defibrillation lead system for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

N G Tullo1, S Saksena, R B Krol, A M Mauro, D Kunecz.   

Abstract

An automatic cardioverter-defibrillator could be implanted using an endocardial defibrillation lead system (consisting of a tripolar defibrillation electrode catheter in conjunction with an epicostal patch electrode) in 9 of 10 patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. Six lead system complications were observed during a follow-up period of 51 +/- 36 weeks. Three catheter electrode conductor fractures occurred and manifested as oversensing and subsequent delivery of inappropriate shocks (1 patient), inability to defibrillate during electrophysiologic testing 3 months after implant (1 patient) and sudden cardiac death (1 patient). Asymptomatic patch electrode conductor fractures were detected on a routine chest roentgenogram in 2 patients. Endocardial defibrillation threshold testing performed at the time of implantation resulted in malfunction of a previously implanted permanent pacemaker pulse generator in 1 patient. Catheter and patch electrode replacement procedures were performed in 3 consenting patients under local anesthesia. Endocardial defibrillation thresholds after lead replacement were comparable to those obtained at time of initial implant. Serial clinical, roentgenographic and electrophysiologic evaluation should be included in follow-up procedures for endocardial defibrillation lead systems. Monitoring for deleterious effects of endocardial defibrillation threshold testing on previously implanted pacemaker systems should be performed at the time of implant and during follow-up. Improved lead designs are necessary for long-term use of endocardial defibrillation electrodes, but replacement procedures are feasible without thoracotomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2386116     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)90695-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  3 in total

1.  Implantable rhythm management device failures and patient/physician notification: a simmering cauldron boils over.

Authors:  Sanjeev Saksena
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  Pacemaker and ICD leads: strategies for long-term management.

Authors:  P Peter Borek; Bruce L Wilkoff
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Role of proximal electrode position in transvenous ventricular defibrillation.

Authors:  J Nitta; D S Khoury
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.934

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.