Literature DB >> 23860937

Ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis in submassive and massive pulmonary embolism: assessment of lung obstruction before and after catheter-directed therapy.

David Quintana1, Jason Salsamendi, Roberto Fourzali, Govindarajan Narayanan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: New treatment guidelines support the use of catheter-directed therapy for both massive and submassive pulmonary embolism (PE). This study examines the safety and effectiveness of ultrasound-accelerated (UA) thrombolysis, for which prompt treatment is warranted to rapidly resolve thrombus and restore cardiopulmonary function.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed ten consecutive, acute submassive/massive PE patients. All patients exhibited acute symptoms and computed tomography evidence of large thrombus burden and evidence of right-ventricular (RV) dysfunction and/or failure. Patients were followed-up with posttreatment echocardiography (n = 7) and CT (n = 9) to evaluate right heart dysfunction and thrombus burden, respectively. Thrombolytic treatment was performed in all patients using the EkoSonic Endovascular system. Clinical outcomes and complications, RV pressures, and thrombus removal were evaluated. Paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed to analyze the pretreatment and posttreatment measures; p < 0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: Median thrombolytic dose was 18.0 mg tissue plasminogen activator infused over 20.8 h. There was a significant decrease in pretreatment and posttreatment RV pressures (52.0-30.0; p < 0.01); there was a significant decrease in pretreatment and posttreatment Mastora obstructive indices (74-43; p < 0.01). All patients improved clinically shortly after treatment onset. All ten patients survived to discharge with a median intensive care (ICU) stay of 4 days and 14 hospital days.
CONCLUSION: UA thrombolysis is promising in massive and submassive PE treatment and shows safe results. Patients showed improved thrombus burden, and rapid improvement in right cardiac function, whereas minimizing bleeding risk and ICU time were minimized. This results of this study provide the foundation for future comparative studies in treatment of large PEs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23860937     DOI: 10.1007/s00270-013-0696-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0174-1551            Impact factor:   2.740


  6 in total

1.  Treatment of Submassive Pulmonary Embolism: Knowing When to be Aggressive and When to be Conservative.

Authors:  David L Ain; Michael R Jaff
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-06

Review 2.  Is there an optimal "door to cath time" in the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism with catheter-directed thrombolysis?

Authors:  Aranyak Rawal; Devarshi Ardeshna; Kirstin Hesterberg; Brandon Cave; Uzoma N Ibebuogu; Rami N Khouzam
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

Review 3.  Ultrasound Assisted Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Review of Current Literature.

Authors:  Muhammad A Mangi; Hiba Rehman; Vikas Bansal; Omer Zuberi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-07-19

4.  Tissue plasminogen activator dose and pulmonary artery pressure reduction in catheter directed thrombolysis of submassive pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Darshan C Patel; Ron C Gaba; Li Liu; R Peter Lokken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Catheter-directed therapy for acute pulmonary embolism: navigating gaps in the evidence.

Authors:  Romain Chopard; Fiona Ecarnot; Nicolas Meneveau
Journal:  Eur Heart J Suppl       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 1.803

Review 6.  An Update on the Management of Acute High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism.

Authors:  Romain Chopard; Julien Behr; Charles Vidoni; Fiona Ecarnot; Nicolas Meneveau
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.964

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.