Literature DB >> 23859469

Health care provider recommendations for reducing cancer risks among women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

K A Metcalfe1, C Kim-Sing, P Ghadirian, P Sun, S A Narod.   

Abstract

There is a significant variation in the uptake of cancer risk reducing options by women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. It is currently unclear why these differences exist and it is possible that recommendations vary between providers and these influence patient decisions. Eligible health care providers who provide genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families in Canada were identified. Each provider was asked to complete a study specific questionnaire that included their opinion of various cancer risk reduction options and their recommendations for specific cases. Respondents recommended prophylactic oophorectomy more often than prophylactic mastectomy or tamoxifen for women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation (p < 0.0001). Fewer than half of the respondents agreed with the recommendation for prophylactic mastectomy, and a minority of the respondents supported the recommendation for tamoxifen for chemoprevention. The majority of Canadian genetics health care providers adhere to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guideline of recommending prophylactic oophorectomy to mutation carriers, however, the minority of genetics health care providers recommend either prophylactic mastectomy or tamoxifen.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA1 mutation; BRCA2 mutation; cancer risk; health care provider recommendations

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23859469     DOI: 10.1111/cge.12233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  7 in total

Review 1.  Systemic Barriers to Risk-Reducing Interventions for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Implications for Health Care Inequities.

Authors:  Kathleen F Mittendorf; Sarah Knerr; Tia L Kauffman; Nangel M Lindberg; Katherine P Anderson; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Marian J Gilmore; Jessica Ezzell Hunter; Galen Joseph; Stephanie A Kraft; Jamilyn M Zepp; Sapna Syngal; Benjamin S Wilfond; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-11-03

2.  The knowledge value-chain of genetic counseling for breast cancer: an empirical assessment of prediction and communication processes.

Authors:  Nabil Amara; Jolyane Blouin-Bougie; Jalila Jbilou; Norrin Halilem; Jacques Simard; Réjean Landry
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Genomics education in nursing in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Mainland China.

Authors:  Sek Ying Chair; Mary Miu Yee Waye; Kathleen Calzone; Carmen Wing Han Chan
Journal:  Int Nurs Rev       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 2.871

Review 4.  Decision making for breast cancer prevention among women at elevated risk.

Authors:  Tasleem J Padamsee; Celia E Wills; Lisa D Yee; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 6.466

5.  Understanding low chemoprevention uptake by women at high risk of breast cancer: findings from a qualitative inductive study of women's risk-reduction experiences.

Authors:  Tasleem J Padamsee; Megan Hils; Anna Muraveva
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 2.809

6.  Evaluation of a Four-Gene Panel for Hereditary Cancer Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Angela Secondino; Flavio Starnone; Iolanda Veneruso; Maria Antonietta Di Tella; Serena Conato; Carmine De Angelis; Sabino De Placido; Valeria D'Argenio
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.141

7.  Cost-utility analysis of risk-reducing strategies to prevent breast and ovarian cancer in BRCA-mutation carriers in Switzerland.

Authors:  Claudine Bommer; Judith Lupatsch; Nicole Bürki; Matthias Schwenkglenks
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2021-11-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.