Literature DB >> 2385807

Pediatric supratentorial tumors.

R A Zimmerman1.   

Abstract

There is a multitude of variables that must be taken into account when interpreting an imaging study and deriving a differential diagnosis. These include the clinical as well as the imaging findings. An intelligent analysis of the imaging findings, whether CT or MR, and whether enhanced or not, will, in most cases, narrow the differential diagnosis. The imaging information, when taken along with the clinical information, should provide guidelines as to the next step, diagnostic or therapeutic. Ultimately, there is no substitute for histologic characterization when the diagnosis remains unresolved and there is a need to institute treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2385807     DOI: 10.1016/0037-198x(90)90053-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Roentgenol        ISSN: 0037-198X            Impact factor:   0.800


  4 in total

Review 1.  Role of MR imaging in pediatric surgery.

Authors:  Raju Sharma; Shivanand Gamanagatti
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Radiology rounds. Pituitary microadenoma (prolactinoma).

Authors:  M K McLennan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Congenital glioblastoma.

Authors:  R M Singhal; M Jain; R K Tanwar; N V Raman
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 4.  Pilocytic astrocytomas with leptomeningeal dissemination: biological behavior, clinical course, and therapeutical options.

Authors:  Ute Buschmann; Bettina Gers; Gerhard Hildebrandt
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2003-05-22       Impact factor: 1.475

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.