Literature DB >> 23857774

Maximizing DNA yield for epidemiologic studies: no more buffy coats?

Mitchell H Gail, Tim Sheehy, Mark Cosentino, David Pee, Norma A Diaz-Mayoral, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Neil E Caporaso, Karen Pitt, Regina G Ziegler.   

Abstract

Some molecular analyses require microgram quantities of DNA, yet many epidemiologic studies preserve only the buffy coat. In Frederick, Maryland, in 2010, we estimated DNA yields from 5 mL of whole blood and from equivalent amounts of all-cell-pellet (ACP) fraction, buffy coat, and residual blood cells from fresh blood (n = 10 volunteers) and from both fresh and frozen blood (n = 10). We extracted DNA with the QIAamp DNA Blood Midi Kit (Qiagen Sciences, Germantown, Maryland) for silica spin column capture and measured double-stranded DNA. Yields from frozen blood fractions were not statistically significantly different from those obtained from fresh fractions. ACP fractions yielded 80.6% (95% confidence interval: 66, 97) of the yield of frozen whole blood and 99.3% (95% confidence interval: 86, 100) of the yield of fresh blood. Frozen buffy coat and residual blood cells each yielded only half as much DNA as frozen ACP, and the yields were more variable. Assuming that DNA yield and quality from frozen ACP are stable, we recommend freezing plasma and ACP. Not only does ACP yield twice as much DNA as buffy coat but it is easier to process, and its yield is less variable from person to person. Long-term stability studies are needed. If one wishes to separate buffy coat before freezing, one should also save the residual blood cell fraction, which contains just as much DNA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA extraction yield; all-cell-pellet fraction; buffy coat; residual blood cells; whole blood

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23857774      PMCID: PMC3783090          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwt079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  6 in total

1.  A simple method for DNA isolation from clotted blood extricated rapidly from serum separator tubes.

Authors:  Steven Se Fum Wong; Jeffrey J Kuei; Naina Prasad; Etsemaye Agonafer; Gustavo A Mendoza; Trevor J Pemberton; Pragna I Patel
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  Characterization of effect of repeated freeze and thaw cycles on stability of genomic DNA using pulsed field gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  Wen Shao; Sonny Khin; William C Kopp
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Guidelines of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group on Blood Drawing, Processing, and Storage for Genetic Studies.

Authors:  M A Austin; J M Ordovas; J H Eckfeldt; R Tracy; E Boerwinkle; J M Lalouel; M Printz
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-09-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Nuclease P1-mediated enhancement of sensitivity of 32P-postlabeling test for structurally diverse DNA adducts.

Authors:  M V Reddy; K Randerath
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.944

5.  Collection and processing of whole blood for transformation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and extraction of DNA: the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium.

Authors:  Silke Rosinger; Sarah Nutland; Eric Mickelson; Michael D Varney; Bernard O Boehm; Gary J Olsem; John A Hansen; Ian Nicholson; Joan E Hilner; Letitia H Perdue; June J Pierce; Beena Akolkar; Concepcion Nierras; Michael W Steffes
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  Buffy coat specimens remain viable as a DNA source for highly multiplexed genome-wide genetic tests after long term storage.

Authors:  Josyf C Mychaleckyj; Emily A Farber; Jessica Chmielewski; Jamie Artale; Laney S Light; Donald W Bowden; Xuanlin Hou; Santica M Marcovina
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 5.531

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  Superparamagnetic-bead Based Method: An Effective DNA Extraction from Dried Blood Spots (DBS) for Diagnostic PCR.

Authors:  Mahmoud Mohammed Sirdah
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-04-15

2.  Evaluating minimally invasive sample collection methods for telomere length measurement.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Goldman; Geeta N Eick; Devan Compton; Paul Kowal; J Josh Snodgrass; Dan T A Eisenberg; Kirstin N Sterner
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 1.937

3.  Preanalytical DNA assessment for downstream applications: How to optimize the management of human biospecimens to support molecular diagnosis-An experimental study.

Authors:  Marina Mordenti; Valentina Capicchioni; Serena Corsini; Manuela Locatelli; Elisabetta Abelli; Federico Banchelli; Manila Boarini; Luca Sangiorgi
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 3.124

4.  Loop-mediated isothermal amplification for Rickettsia typhi (the causal agent of murine typhus): problems with diagnosis at the limit of detection.

Authors:  Sabine Dittrich; Josée Castonguay-Vanier; Catrin E Moore; Narongchai Thongyoo; Paul N Newton; Daniel H Paris
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 5.948

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.