Literature DB >> 23857190

Analysis of boutique arrays: a universal method for the selection of the optimal data normalization procedure.

Barbara Uszczyńska1, Joanna Zyprych-Walczak, Luiza Handschuh, Alicja Szabelska, Maciej Kaźmierczak, Wiesława Woronowicz, Piotr Kozłowski, Michał M Sikorski, Mieczysław Komarnicki, Idzi Siatkowski, Marek Figlerowicz.   

Abstract

DNA microarrays, which are among the most popular genomic tools, are widely applied in biology and medicine. Boutique arrays, which are small, spotted, dedicated microarrays, constitute an inexpensive alternative to whole-genome screening methods. The data extracted from each microarray-based experiment must be transformed and processed prior to further analysis to eliminate any technical bias. The normalization of the data is the most crucial step of microarray data pre-processing and this process must be carefully considered as it has a profound effect on the results of the analysis. Several normalization algorithms have been developed and implemented in data analysis software packages. However, most of these methods were designed for whole-genome analysis. In this study, we tested 13 normalization strategies (ten for double-channel data and three for single-channel data) available on R Bioconductor and compared their effectiveness in the normalization of four boutique array datasets. The results revealed that boutique arrays can be successfully normalized using standard methods, but not every method is suitable for each dataset. We also suggest a universal seven-step workflow that can be applied for the selection of the optimal normalization procedure for any boutique array dataset. The described workflow enables the evaluation of the investigated normalization methods based on the bias and variance values for the control probes, a differential expression analysis and a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The analysis of each component results in a separate ranking of the normalization methods. A combination of the ranks obtained from all the normalization procedures facilitates the selection of the most appropriate normalization method for the studied dataset and determines which methods can be used interchangeably.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23857190     DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2013.1443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Mol Med        ISSN: 1107-3756            Impact factor:   4.101


  3 in total

1.  The Impact of Normalization Methods on RNA-Seq Data Analysis.

Authors:  J Zyprych-Walczak; A Szabelska; L Handschuh; K Górczak; K Klamecka; M Figlerowicz; I Siatkowski
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Gene expression profiling of acute myeloid leukemia samples from adult patients with AML-M1 and -M2 through boutique microarrays, real-time PCR and droplet digital PCR.

Authors:  Luiza Handschuh; Maciej Kaźmierczak; Marek C Milewski; Michał Góralski; Magdalena Łuczak; Marzena Wojtaszewska; Barbara Uszczyńska-Ratajczak; Krzysztof Lewandowski; Mieczysław Komarnicki; Marek Figlerowicz
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 5.650

3.  Defining housekeeping genes suitable for RNA-seq analysis of the human allograft kidney biopsy tissue.

Authors:  Zijie Wang; Zili Lyu; Ling Pan; Gang Zeng; Parmjeet Randhawa
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 3.063

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.