Literature DB >> 23856216

Increased right-to-left ventricle diameter ratio is a strong predictor of right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device.

Rey P Vivo1, Andrea M Cordero-Reyes, Umair Qamar, Sireesha Garikipati, Alejandro R Trevino, Molham Aldeiri, Matthias Loebe, Brian A Bruckner, Guillermo Torre-Amione, Arvind Bhimaraj, Barry H Trachtenberg, Jerry D Estep.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Predictors of right ventricular failure (RVF) in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have not been fully elucidated and are comprised mostly of clinical variables. We evaluated echocardiographic parameters associated with adverse outcomes in this population.
METHODS: Transthoracic echocardiograms (TTEs) before continuous-flow LVAD implantation were analyzed in 109 patients. Twenty-six 2-dimensional and Doppler parameters were assessed for their association with the primary outcome of 30-day RVF, defined as a requirement of an RV assist device or ≥ 14 consecutive days of inotropic support, and the secondary composite outcome of 30-day death or RVF. Multivariate analysis adjusted for known clinical risk prediction models was performed.
RESULTS: Overall, 25 (22.9%) and 27 (24.8%) patients reached the primary and secondary end-points, respectively. An increased RV/LV diameter ratio was the only TTE variable independently associated with both the primary (odds ratio [OR] = 5.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.40 to 12.40; p = 0.012) and secondary (OR = 2.70; 95% CI 1.06 to 6.22; p = 0.03) outcomes after multivariate analysis. Scatterplot analysis with regression determined the optimal cut-off value for RV/LV diameter to be 0.75. Based on receiver operating characteristic curves, an increased RV/LV diameter ratio provided an additional predictive value to clinical risk scores.
CONCLUSIONS: A TTE-measured RV/LV diameter ratio of ≥0.75 is independently associated with a higher risk for RVF in patients with continuous-flow LVAD. When used alone, this simple, easily derived, practical echocardiographic measurement has a predictive value equivalent to known clinical risk scores, whereas their combination provides stronger risk prediction for adverse outcomes.
Copyright © 2013 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  echocardiography; left ventricular assist device; outcomes; right ventricular failure; risk stratification

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23856216     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2013.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  17 in total

Review 1.  Left ventricular assist device implantation strategies and outcomes.

Authors:  LaVone A Smith; Leora T Yarboro; Jamie L W Kennedy
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  The right ventricle under pressure: evaluating the adaptive and maladaptive changes in the right ventricle in pulmonary arterial hypertension using echocardiography (2013 Grover Conference series).

Authors:  Alexis Harrison; Nathan Hatton; John J Ryan
Journal:  Pulm Circ       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.017

Review 3.  Predictors and management of right heart failure after left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Nadia Fida; Matthias Loebe; Jerry D Estep; Ashrith Guha
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

4.  Right Ventricular Fiber Structure as a Compensatory Mechanism in Pressure Overload: A Computational Study.

Authors:  Arnold D Gomez; Huashan Zou; Megan E Bowen; Xiaoqing Liu; Edward W Hsu; Stephen H McKellar
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Right Ventricular Dysfunction and Its Contribution to Morbidity and Mortality in Left Ventricular Heart Failure.

Authors:  Amresh Raina; Talha Meeran
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2018-04

6.  Comparative Analysis of Established Risk Scores and Novel Hemodynamic Metrics in Predicting Right Ventricular Failure in Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients.

Authors:  Anthony E Peters; LaVone A Smith; Priscilla Ababio; Khadijah Breathett; Timothy L McMurry; Jamie L W Kennedy; Mohammad Abuannadi; James Bergin; Sula Mazimba
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 5.712

Review 7.  The practical role of echocardiography in selection, implantation, and management of patients requiring LVAD therapy.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Todaro; Bijoy K Khandheria; Timothy E Paterick; Matt M Umland; Vinay Thohan
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Temporary assist device support for the right ventricle: pre-implant and post-implant challenges.

Authors:  Michael Dandel; Roland Hetzer
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 9.  Assessment of right ventricular function in left ventricular assist device candidates.

Authors:  Salim Hayek; Daniel B Sims; David W Markham; Javed Butler; Andreas P Kalogeropoulos
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 7.792

10.  Prediction of right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation in patients with heart failure: a meta-analysis comparing echocardiographic parameters.

Authors:  Louis-Emmanuel Chriqui; Pierre Monney; Matthias Kirsch; Piergiorgio Tozzi
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-10-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.