Literature DB >> 23856076

Face perception is category-specific: evidence from normal body perception in acquired prosopagnosia.

Tirta Susilo1, Galit Yovel, Jason J S Barton, Bradley Duchaine.   

Abstract

Does the human visual system contain perceptual mechanisms specialized for particular object categories such as faces? This question lies at the heart of a long-running debate in face perception. The face-specific hypothesis posits that face perception relies on mechanisms dedicated to faces, while the expertise hypothesis proposes that faces are processed by more generic mechanisms that operate on objects we have extended experience with. Previous studies that have addressed this question using acquired prosopagnosia are inconclusive because the non-face categories tested (e.g., cars) were not well-matched to faces in terms of visual exposure and perceptual experience. Here we compare perception of faces and bodies in four acquired prosopagnosics. Critically, we used face and body tasks that generate comparable inversion effects in controls, which indicates that our tasks engage orientation-specific perceptual mechanisms for faces and bodies to a similar extent. Three prosopagnosics were able to discriminate bodies normally despite their impairment in face perception. Moreover, they exhibited normal inversion effects for bodies, suggesting their body perception was carried out by the same mechanisms used by controls. Our findings indicate that the human visual system contains processes specialized for faces.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body; Expertise; Face; Inversion; Perception; Prosopagnosia

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23856076     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  8 in total

1.  Italian normative data and validation of two neuropsychological tests of face recognition: Benton Facial Recognition Test and Cambridge Face Memory Test.

Authors:  Andrea Albonico; Manuela Malaspina; Roberta Daini
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Normal acquisition of expertise with greebles in two cases of acquired prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Constantin Rezlescu; Jason J S Barton; David Pitcher; Bradley Duchaine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  One object, two networks? Assessing the relationship between the face and body-selective regions in the primate visual system.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; J Brendan Ritchie; Leslie G Ungerleider; Christopher I Baker
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.270

4.  Where You Look Matters for Body Perception: Preferred Gaze Location Contributes to the Body Inversion Effect.

Authors:  Joseph M Arizpe; Danielle L McKean; Jack W Tsao; Annie W-Y Chan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Prosopagnosia: current perspectives.

Authors:  Sherryse L Corrow; Kirsten A Dalrymple; Jason Js Barton
Journal:  Eye Brain       Date:  2016-09-26

Review 6.  Progress in perceptual research: the case of prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Andrea Albonico; Jason Barton
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-05-31

7.  Body Inversion Effects With Photographic Images of Body Postures: Is It About Faces?

Authors:  Emma L Axelsson; Rachel A Robbins; Helen F Copeland; Hester W Covell
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-11-29

8.  Making heads or tails of body inversion effects: Do heads matter?

Authors:  Emma L Axelsson; Tharindi Buddhadasa; Laura Manca; Rachel A Robbins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.