Literature DB >> 23855027

"Lost milk?": Counting the economic value of breast milk in gross domestic product.

J P Smith1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The contribution of breastfeeding and mothers milk to the economy is invisible in economic statistics.
OBJECTIVE: This article demonstrates how the economic value of human milk production can be included in economic statistics such as gross domestic product (GDP) and provides estimates for Australia, the United States, and Norway.
METHODS: The contribution of human milk and lactation to GDP in these countries is estimated using United Nations (System of National Accounting) guidelines and conventional economic valuation approaches to measuring production in GDP.
RESULTS: In Australia, current human milk production levels exceed $3 billion annually. The United States has the potential to produce human milk worth more than US$110 billion a year, but currently nearly two thirds of this value is lost due to premature weaning. In Norway, production valued at US$907 million annually is 60% of its potential value.
CONCLUSIONS: The potential loss of economic value from not protecting women's lactation and milk production from competing market pressures is large. Failure to account for mothers' milk production in GDP and other economic data has important consequences for public policy. The invisibility of human milk reduces the perceived importance of programs and regulations that protect and support women to breastfeed. The value of human milk can be measured using accepted international guidelines for calculating national income and production. It is quantitatively nontrivial and should be counted in GDP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Australia; Norway; United States; breastfeeding; breastfeeding benefits; cost savings; cost–benefit analysis; government policy; milk banking

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23855027     DOI: 10.1177/0890334413494827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Lact        ISSN: 0890-3344            Impact factor:   2.219


  8 in total

1.  Investing in breastfeeding - the world breastfeeding costing initiative.

Authors:  Radha Holla-Bhar; Alessandro Iellamo; Arun Gupta; Julie P Smith; Jai Prakash Dadhich
Journal:  Int Breastfeed J       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.461

2.  Counting the cost of not breastfeeding is now easier, but women's unpaid health care work remains invisible.

Authors:  Julie P Smith
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 3.344

3.  The economic benefits of increasing breastfeeding rates in Spain.

Authors:  Juan Antonio Quesada; Ildefonso Méndez; Rocío Martín-Gil
Journal:  Int Breastfeed J       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 3.461

4.  Rediscovering empowerment with breastfeeding in an urban First Nation's population.

Authors:  Deborah Schroeder; Pamala Larsen; Norma Jean Byrd
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Social value of maintaining baby-friendly hospital initiative accreditation in Australia: case study.

Authors:  Andini Pramono; Julie Smith; Jane Desborough; Siobhan Bourke
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2021-01-07

6.  Cost Savings of Mother's Own Milk for Very Low Birth Weight Infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Tricia J Johnson; Aloka L Patel; Michael E Schoeny; Paula P Meier
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2022-02-11

7.  Food security for infants and young children: an opportunity for breastfeeding policy?

Authors:  Libby Salmon
Journal:  Int Breastfeed J       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.461

8.  Acceptability of donor breastmilk banking among health workers: a cross-sectional survey in Zimbabwean urban settings.

Authors:  Dexter T Chagwena; Felistas Mugariri; Bhekimpilo Sithole; Steady Faith Mataga; Ruvimbo Danda; Tonderayi M Matsungo; Charles C Maponga
Journal:  Int Breastfeed J       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.461

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.