Literature DB >> 23852591

Glenoid morphology affects the incidence of radiolucent lines around cemented pegged polyethylene glenoid components.

Stefan Greiner1, Alexander Berth, Max Kääb, Ulrich Irlenbusch.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Radiolucent lines (RLL) are frequent findings around cemented all-polyethylene glenoid implants. The present study evaluates the frequency, extend and the clinical impact of RLL around a cemented two-pegged glenoid implant with special focus on the influence of preoperative glenoid morphology. Our hypothesis was that glenoid morphology does not affect clinical outcome and RLL in the investigated setting.
METHODS: Between 2003 and 2008, a total of 113 cases of total shoulder arthroplasties (Affinis, Mathys Ltd Bettlach, Switzerland) were performed in three surgical centres using a pegged cemented polyethylene glenoid component. A total of 90 cases could be evaluated clinically and radiographically. Clinical outcome was analysed using the constant score (CS) and range of motion assessment. Radiographic evaluation was performed in true anterior-posterior and axial views with special focus on loosening and RLL. Further, preoperative glenoid morphology was documented and its correlation to radiolucent lines and clinical outcomes was evaluated.
RESULTS: At a mean of 58.8 (range 31.2-92.5)-month follow-up the CS improved from 21.5 points preoperatively to 62.3 points postoperatively. Radiolucent lines were found in 76.6 % of cases. If present, RLL were located at the backside of the implant (74.4 %) in the majority of the cases not around the pegs (10 %). There was no significant correlation between RLL and clinical outcome or follow-up time. The amount and extend of RLL were correlated to glenoid morphology with significantly higher values for glenoid types B2 and C according to Walch in comparison to glenoid types A1, A2 and B1.
CONCLUSIONS: RLL did not affect clinical outcome and did not correlate with the follow-up time. Patients with glenoid morphology types B2 and C showed significantly worse radiographic results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV case series study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23852591     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-013-1813-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  11 in total

1.  Radiological and functional 24-month outcomes of resurfacing versus stemmed anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael C Glanzmann; Christoph Kolling; Hans-Kaspar Schwyzer; Matthias Flury; Laurent Audigé
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Can the ream and run procedure improve glenohumeral relationships and function for shoulders with the arthritic triad?

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Winston J Warme; Sarah E Jackins
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Radiologic midterm results of cemented and uncemented glenoid components in primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder: a matched pair analysis.

Authors:  Petra Magosch; Peter Habermeyer; Philipp Vetter
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Mid-term results of a stemless ceramic on polyethylene shoulder prosthesis - A prospective multicentre study.

Authors:  R W Jordan; C P Kelly; G Pap; T Joudet; R W Nyffeler; F Reuther; U Irlenbusch
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2019-08-14

5.  Cement pressurizing reduces radiolucent lines at glenoid: A randomized, multicentric study.

Authors:  Philip Kasten; Patric Raiss; Felix Zeifang; Richard Stangl; Stefan Greiner; Matthias Zumstein; Jörg Nowotny; Katrin Schmitt; Marc Schnetzke; Falk Reuther; Dirk Frauenschuh
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2019-08-01

6.  Short stem shoulder replacement.

Authors:  Simon N Bell; Jennifer A Coghlan
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2014-07

7.  Total shoulder arthroplasty with nonspherical humeral head and inlay glenoid replacement: clinical results comparing concentric and nonconcentric glenoid stages in primary shoulder arthritis.

Authors:  Anthony C Egger; Jennifer Peterson; Morgan H Jones; Anthony Miniaci
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2019-09-13

Review 8.  A comparison of pegged vs. keeled glenoid components regarding functional and radiographic outcomes in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arthur Welsher; Chetan Gohal; Kim Madden; Bruce Miller; Asheesh Bedi; Bashar Alolabi; Moin Khan
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2019-07-11

9.  Clinical results and survivorship of the Mathys Affinis Short, Short Stem Total Shoulder Prosthesis.

Authors:  Timothy James Karssiens; James Ritchie Gill; Karadi Hari Sunil Kumar; Søren Upton Sjolin
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2021-01-22

10.  Loosening and revision rates after total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of cemented all-polyethylene glenoid and three modern designs of metal-backed glenoid.

Authors:  Dong Min Kim; Mohammed Aldeghaither; Fahad Alabdullatif; Myung Jin Shin; Erica Kholinne; Hyojune Kim; In-Ho Jeon; Kyoung-Hwan Koh
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.