INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging and its value in differentiating the histologic grade among human gliomas. METHODS: The IVIM model generated parametric images for apparent diffusion coefficient ADC, slow diffusion coefficient D (or D slow), fast diffusion coefficient D* (or D fast), and fractional perfusion-related volume f in 22 patients with gliomas (WHO grade II-IV) using monopolar Stejskal-Tanner diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) scheme and 14 b values ranging from 0 s/mm2 to a maximum of 1,300 s/mm2. A region-of-interest analysis on the tumor as well as in the white matter was conducted. The parameter values were tested for significant differences. The repeatability of the measurements was tested by coefficient of variation and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: D, D*, and f in the high-grade gliomas demonstrated significant differences compared to the healthy white matter. D* and f showed a significant difference between low- and high-grade gliomas. D tended to be slightly lower in the WHO grade II compared to WHO grade III-IV tumors. f and D* demonstrated higher coefficients of variation than the ADC and D in tumor. The Bland-Altman plots demonstrated satisfactory results without any outliers outside the mean ± 1.96 standard deviation. CONCLUSION: The IVIM-fitted post-processing of DWI-signal decay in human gliomas could show significantly different values of fractional perfusion-related volume and fast diffusion coefficient between low- and high-grade tumors, which might enable a noninvasive WHO grading in vivo.
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging and its value in differentiating the histologic grade among humangliomas. METHODS: The IVIM model generated parametric images for apparent diffusion coefficient ADC, slow diffusion coefficient D (or D slow), fast diffusion coefficient D* (or D fast), and fractional perfusion-related volume f in 22 patients with gliomas (WHO grade II-IV) using monopolar Stejskal-Tanner diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) scheme and 14 b values ranging from 0 s/mm2 to a maximum of 1,300 s/mm2. A region-of-interest analysis on the tumor as well as in the white matter was conducted. The parameter values were tested for significant differences. The repeatability of the measurements was tested by coefficient of variation and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: D, D*, and f in the high-grade gliomas demonstrated significant differences compared to the healthy white matter. D* and f showed a significant difference between low- and high-grade gliomas. D tended to be slightly lower in the WHO grade II compared to WHO grade III-IV tumors. f and D* demonstrated higher coefficients of variation than the ADC and D in tumor. The Bland-Altman plots demonstrated satisfactory results without any outliers outside the mean ± 1.96 standard deviation. CONCLUSION: The IVIM-fitted post-processing of DWI-signal decay in humangliomas could show significantly different values of fractional perfusion-related volume and fast diffusion coefficient between low- and high-grade tumors, which might enable a noninvasive WHO grading in vivo.
Authors: Kevin M Bennett; Kathleen M Schmainda; Raoqiong Tong Bennett; Daniel B Rowe; Hanbing Lu; James S Hyde Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Lukas Filli; Moritz C Wurnig; Roger Luechinger; Christian Eberhardt; Roman Guggenberger; Andreas Boss Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-01-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Dale L Bailey; Henryk Barthel; Bettina Beuthin-Baumann; Thomas Beyer; Sotirios Bisdas; Ronald Boellaard; Johannes Czernin; Alexander Drzezga; Ulrike Ernemann; Christiane Franzius; Brigitte Gückel; Rupert Handgretinger; Markus Hartenbach; Dirk Hellwig; Helen Nadel; Stephan G Nekolla; Thomas Pfluger; Bernd J Pichler; Harald H Quick; Osama Sabri; Bernhard Sattler; Jürgen Schäfer; Fritz Schick; Barry A Siegel; Heinz P Schlemmer; Nina F Schwenzer; Jörg van den Hoff; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Hans F Wehrl Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Eddie Surer; Cristina Rossi; Anton S Becker; Tim Finkenstaedt; Moritz C Wurnig; Antonios Valavanis; Sebastian Winklhofer Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2018-02-22 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: S M Wong; W H Backes; C E Zhang; J Staals; R J van Oostenbrugge; C R L P N Jeukens; J F A Jansen Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-12-07 Impact factor: 3.825