Literature DB >> 23852365

Utilizing repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to improve language function in stroke patients with chronic non-fluent aphasia.

Gabriella Garcia1, Catherine Norise, Olufunsho Faseyitan, Margaret A Naeser, Roy H Hamilton.   

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been shown to significantly improve language function in patients with non-fluent aphasia(1). In this experiment, we demonstrate the administration of low-frequency repetitive TMS (rTMS) to an optimal stimulation site in the right hemisphere in patients with chronic non-fluent aphasia. A battery of standardized language measures is administered in order to assess baseline performance. Patients are subsequently randomized to either receive real rTMS or initial sham stimulation. Patients in the real stimulation undergo a site-finding phase, comprised of a series of six rTMS sessions administered over five days; stimulation is delivered to a different site in the right frontal lobe during each of these sessions. Each site-finding session consists of 600 pulses of 1 Hz rTMS, preceded and followed by a picture-naming task. By comparing the degree of transient change in naming ability elicited by stimulation of candidate sites, we are able to locate the area of optimal response for each individual patient. We then administer rTMS to this site during the treatment phase. During treatment, patients undergo a total of ten days of stimulation over the span of two weeks; each session is comprised of 20 min of 1 Hz rTMS delivered at 90% resting motor threshold. Stimulation is paired with an fMRI-naming task on the first and last days of treatment. After the treatment phase is complete, the language battery obtained at baseline is repeated two and six months following stimulation in order to identify rTMS-induced changes in performance. The fMRI-naming task is also repeated two and six months following treatment. Patients who are randomized to the sham arm of the study undergo sham site-finding, sham treatment, fMRI-naming studies, and repeat language testing two months after completing sham treatment. Sham patients then cross over into the real stimulation arm, completing real site-finding, real treatment, fMRI, and two- and six-month post-stimulation language testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23852365      PMCID: PMC3731176          DOI: 10.3791/50228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  23 in total

1.  Peabody picture vocabulary test performance of trainable mentally retarded children.

Authors:  L M DUNN; J V HOTTEL
Journal:  Am J Ment Defic       Date:  1961-01

2.  Improved picture naming in chronic aphasia after TMS to part of right Broca's area: an open-protocol study.

Authors:  Margaret A Naeser; Paula I Martin; Marjorie Nicholas; Errol H Baker; Heidi Seekins; Masahito Kobayashi; Hugo Theoret; Felipe Fregni; Jose Maria-Tormos; Jacquie Kurland; Karl W Doron; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Aphasia after stroke: natural history and associated deficits.

Authors:  D T Wade; R L Hewer; R M David; P M Enderby
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

5.  Improved language performance subsequent to low-frequency rTMS in patients with chronic non-fluent aphasia post-stroke.

Authors:  C H S Barwood; B E Murdoch; B-M Whelan; D Lloyd; S Riek; J D O' Sullivan; A Coulthard; A Wong
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 6.089

Review 6.  The use of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques to facilitate recovery from post-stroke aphasia.

Authors:  Gottfried Schlaug; Sarah Marchina; Catherine Y Wan
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2011-08-14       Impact factor: 7.444

7.  Stimulating conversation: enhancement of elicited propositional speech in a patient with chronic non-fluent aphasia following transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Roy H Hamilton; Linda Sanders; Jennifer Benson; Olufunsho Faseyitan; Catherine Norise; Margaret Naeser; Paula Martin; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Minimizing within-experiment and within-group effects in Activation Likelihood Estimation meta-analyses.

Authors:  Peter E Turkeltaub; Simon B Eickhoff; Angela R Laird; Mick Fox; Martin Wiener; Peter Fox
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Finding the Right Words: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Improves Discourse Productivity in Non-fluent Aphasia After Stroke.

Authors:  Jared Medina; Catherine Norise; Olufunsho Faseyitan; H Branch Coslett; Peter E Turkeltaub; Roy H Hamilton
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.773

Review 10.  Research with transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of aphasia.

Authors:  Paula I Martin; Margaret A Naeser; Michael Ho; Ethan Treglia; Elina Kaplan; Errol H Baker; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.081

View more
  5 in total

1.  Functional Reorganization of Right Prefrontal Cortex Underlies Sustained Naming Improvements in Chronic Aphasia via Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Denise Y Harvey; Jamie Podell; Peter E Turkeltaub; Olufunsho Faseyitan; H Branch Coslett; Roy H Hamilton
Journal:  Cogn Behav Neurol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 2.  Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in the Treatment of Post-stroke and Neurodegenerative Aphasia: Parallels, Differences, and Lessons Learned.

Authors:  Catherine Norise; Roy H Hamilton
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 3.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Primary Motor Cortex beyond Motor Rehabilitation: A Review of the Current Evidence.

Authors:  Abdulhameed Tomeh; Abdul Hanif Khan Yusof Khan; Liyana Najwa Inche Mat; Hamidon Basri; Wan Aliaa Wan Sulaiman
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-06-10

4.  Augmenting melodic intonation therapy with non-invasive brain stimulation to treat impaired left-hemisphere function: two case studies.

Authors:  Shahd Al-Janabi; Lyndsey A Nickels; Paul F Sowman; Hana Burianová; Dawn L Merrett; William F Thompson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-04

Review 5.  Transcranial brain stimulation (TMS and tDCS) for post-stroke aphasia rehabilitation: Controversies.

Authors:  Lucia Iracema Zanotto de Mendonça
Journal:  Dement Neuropsychol       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.