Literature DB >> 23852159

Identification of GSX2 and AF10 as NUP98 partner genes in myeloid malignancies.

G Soler1, S Kaltenbach, S Dobbelstein, C Broccardo, I Radford, M-J Mozziconacci, O A Bernard, V Penard-Lacronique, E Delabesse, S P Romana.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23852159      PMCID: PMC3730198          DOI: 10.1038/bcj.2013.20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Cancer J        ISSN: 2044-5385            Impact factor:   11.037


× No keyword cloud information.
The Nucleoporin 98 gene (NUP98) is a promiscuous gene implicated in chromosomal aberrations in hematopoietic disorders. NUP98 encodes a 98-kDa protein of the nuclear pore complex that regulates nucleocytoplasmic transport of protein and RNA. Twenty-eight different NUP98 partner genes have been identified across various human hematological malignancies,[1, 2] many of which encode for homeodomain (HD) transcription factors and chromatin-modifying factors. We report here two new oncogenic fusions for NUP98, involving the homeobox gene genetic screened homeobox 2 (GSX2, formerly Gsh2) and the putative zinc-finger transcription factor gene ALL-1 fused gene from chromosome 10 (AF10)/MLLT10. Patient 1 is a 57-year-old woman with a post-myeloproliferative neoplasm M4 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) associated with a t(4;11)(q12;p15) translocation and trisomy 8. Patient 2 is an 83-year-old man who developed an atypical myelodysplastic syndrome resembling chronic myelomonocytic leukemia associated with a t(10;11)(p12;p15) translocation. Molécular cytogenetic techniques demonstrated the NUP98-GSX2 and NUP98-AF10 fusions for the t(4;11) and the t(10;11) respectively (not shown). Reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR using primers located within NUP98, GSX2 and AF10 exons validated the presence of the NUP98GSX2 and NUP98AF10 fusion transcripts in patient samples (Supplementary Figure 1). Nucleotide sequencing showed an in-frame fusion of the NUP98 exon 12 with GSX2 exon 2, predicting a putative chimeric protein of 59 kDa that joins the Gly-Leu-Phe-Gly (GLFG) repeats of the amino-terminal part of NUP98 at the carboxy (C)-terminal part of GSX2 containing a HD (Figure 1). Sequence analysis of the NUP98AF10 fusion transcript showed an in-frame fusion of NUP98 exon 11 with AF10 exon 15, predicting a 1027-amino-acid protein with the NUP98 GLFG repeats fused to the C-terminal part of the AF10 protein including the octapeptide motif-leucine-zipper (OM-LZ) domain and the glutamine-rich (Q-rich) sequence of AF10, but without the nuclear localization signal (NLS) region.
Figure 1

Schematic representation of the native or chimeric AF10 and GSX2 and NUP98 proteins. RNP-BD, ribonucleoparticle binding domain; PHD, plant homeodomain; Q-rich, glutamine-rich region.

Both AF10 and GSX2 genes have been involved in human hematological malignancies. GSX2 is a brain-specific class II homeobox gene of the Antennapedia family that regulates the development of mouse embryonic telencephalon.[3] It has been associated with acute leukemia through its involvement in the recurrent t(4;12)(q11q12;p13) translocation.[4] AF10 belongs to a family of proteins that includes AF17 and BR140 characterized by the presence of a C-terminal OM-LZ domain. AF10 is considered a putative transcription factor, binding DNA through an AT hook motif and interacting with the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex.[5] Through its OM-LZ domain, AF10 interacts with the histone methyltransferase hDOT1L that methylates the lysine 79 residues of histone H3 (H3K79),[6, 7] a mark associated with an open-chromatin configuration. In hematological malignancies, AF10 is fused to the mixed lineage leukemia (MLL) gene by the t(10;11)(p12;q23) translocation[8] and to the clathrin assembly lymphoid myeloid leukemia (CALM) gene by the t(10;11)(p12;q14) translocation.[9] The transformation potential of the two NUP98 fusions was investigated by transducing murine primary bone marrow (BM) hematopoietic progenitors, defined as lineage-negative cells, by murine stem cell virus (MSCV) retroviral vectors containing different versions of Flag-tagged NUP98GSX2 and NUP98AF10 sequences as reported.[10] Cells were transduced with MSCV expressing the native NUP98GSX2 and NUP98AF10 fusions, fusions deleted for the conserved functional domains (NUP98GSX2-⊗HD and NUP98AF10-ΔOM-LZ) or with the empty MSCV. Transduced cells were seeded in methylcellulose medium for serial plating assays. We observed that NUP98GSX2-transduced progenitors formed numerous colonies after the fourth round of replating, whereas control cells were not replated after the third round (Figure 2a). Cytological analysis of the colonies showed that cells expressing NUP98GSX2 exhibit a blast morphology, whereas empty MSCV-transduced progenitors formed monocytic and mast cell colonies (not shown). In contrast, NUP98GSX2-⊗HD-transduced progenitors showed no proliferative advantage and were not able to form colonies after the second replating, thus illustrating that the transforming effect of the NUP98GSX2 fusion requires the GSX2 HD. Immunofluorescence analysis showed a marked nuclear presence for the NUP98GSX2 protein, whereas NUP98GSX2-⊗HD was located both in the nucleus and in the cytosol with a diffuse staining pattern (Supplementary Figure 2). These data demonstrated that the NUP98GSX2 fusion encodes a nuclear protein with a GSX2 HD-dependent oncogenic capacity. Progenitors transduced with NUP98AF10 were able to produce a significantly increased number of colonies up to the third round of plating, contrary to the NUP98AF10-ΔOM-LZ-transduced cells, which did not generate a significant number after the second round of plating (Figure 2a). Thus, expression of NUP98AF10 is sufficient to induce a proliferative advantage in progenitor BM cells and this proliferative effect depends on the integrity of the OM-LZ region. CALMAF10 (as well as some MLL fusions) participates in gene deregulation by virtue of hDOT1L recruitment at target gene loci, in particular for certain HOXA genes. As its transforming potential is linked to the integrity of the OM-LZ domain, we hypothesized that the oncogenic capacity of NUP98AF10 is linked to HOXA gene deregulation by a process similar to that involved in MLLAF10 and CALMAF10 fusions. We performed quantitative RT-PCR to measure the levels of the HOXA5, HOXA7, HOXA9, HOXA10 transcripts and that of the HOX cofactor MEIS1 transcript in patient 2's (NUP98AF10 fusion) BM cells (Figure 2b) (no material was available for patient 1). Expression analyses were performed in parallel in samples from patients with AML1-ETO-positive leukemia (n=2) as a negative control for HOXA expression, and in samples from patients with MLLAF10 (n=1)- and NUP98HOXA9 (n=2)-positive leukemia as positive controls. In patient 2's BM cells, we observed an elevated expression of HOXA5, HOXA7, HOXA9 and MEIS1 as in leukemic cells with MLLAF10 and NUP98HOXA9 fusions. HOXA10 was specifically overexpressed in the MLLAF10 sample. No HOXA cluster gene expression was observed in AML1-ETO BM cells. In murine models, NUP98 fusions are often associated with upregulation of HOXA cluster and MEIS1 genes in blast cells.[11, 12, 13] Thus, NUP98AF10-transduced BM cells were engrafted into sublethally irradiated mice. Mice transplanted with cells transduced with empty (n=10) or NUP98AF10 MSCV vectors (n=5) remained free of hematological disease up to 12 months after transplantation (not shown), contrary to those receiving cells transduced with the NUP98HMGB3 fusion.[10] Altogether, our results indicate that contrary to the MLLAF10 and CALMAF10 fusions,[14, 15] NUP98AF10 has only weak oncogenic power. This may be explained by the lack of an exclusively nuclear localization for NUP98AF10 due to the absence of the NLS of AF10 in the chimeric protein.
Figure 2

(a) Serial colony-plating assay of bone marrow progenitors transduced by wild-type, NUP98, NUP98–GSX2, NUP98–AF10 or empty vector. The average colony numbers±s.d. values are shown for three independent experiments. (b) Quantitative RT-PCR analyses of the HOXA5, HOXA7, HOXA9, HOXA10 and MEIS1 gene expression from RNA of various human AML samples carrying the following fusion genes: AML1-ETO (n=2), MLL–AF10 (n=1), NUP98–HOXA9 (n=2) and NUP98–AF10 (n=1). Expression was normalized with respect to ABL expression.

In conclusion, the identification of AF10 and GSX2 as new NUP98 partner genes in hematological malignancies strengthens the predominance of homeobox and chromatin-modifier genes as NUP98 partners and the deregulation of HOXA cluster genes as an oncogenic mechanism in several NUP98-associated leukemia.
  15 in total

1.  The MLL fusion partner AF10 binds GAS41, a protein that interacts with the human SWI/SNF complex.

Authors:  Silvana Debernardi; Alessandra Bassini; Louise K Jones; Tracy Chaplin; Britta Linder; Diederik R H de Bruijn; Eckart Meese; Bryan D Young
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Homeobox genes Gsx1 and Gsx2 differentially regulate telencephalic progenitor maturation.

Authors:  Zhenglei Pei; Bei Wang; Gang Chen; Motoshi Nagao; Masato Nakafuku; Kenneth Campbell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Leukaemic transformation by CALM-AF10 involves upregulation of Hoxa5 by hDOT1L.

Authors:  Yuki Okada; Qi Jiang; Margot Lemieux; Lucie Jeannotte; Lishan Su; Yi Zhang
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2006-08-20       Impact factor: 28.824

4.  Evidence for position effects as a variant ETV6-mediated leukemogenic mechanism in myeloid leukemias with a t(4;12)(q11-q12;p13) or t(5;12)(q31;p13).

Authors:  Jan Cools; Nicole Mentens; Maria D Odero; Pieter Peeters; Iwona Wlodarska; Michel Delforge; Anne Hagemeijer; Peter Marynen
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  hDOT1L links histone methylation to leukemogenesis.

Authors:  Yuki Okada; Qin Feng; Yihui Lin; Qi Jiang; Yaqiang Li; Vernon M Coffield; Lishan Su; Guoliang Xu; Yi Zhang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  The t(10;11)(p13;q14) in the U937 cell line results in the fusion of the AF10 gene and CALM, encoding a new member of the AP-3 clathrin assembly protein family.

Authors:  M H Dreyling; J A Martinez-Climent; M Zheng; J Mao; J D Rowley; S K Bohlander
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Leukemogenic properties of NUP98-PMX1 are linked to NUP98 and homeodomain sequence functions but not to binding properties of PMX1 to serum response factor.

Authors:  K Hirose; C Abramovich; B Argiropoulos; R K Humphries
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  NUP98 rearrangements in hematopoietic malignancies: a study of the Groupe Francophone de Cytogénétique Hématologique.

Authors:  S P Romana; I Radford-Weiss; R Ben Abdelali; C Schluth; A Petit; N Dastugue; P Talmant; C Bilhou-Nabera; F Mugneret; M Lafage-Pochitaloff; M-J Mozziconacci; J Andrieu; J-L Lai; C Terre; K Rack; P Cornillet-Lefebvre; I Luquet; N Nadal; F Nguyen-Khac; C Perot; J Van den Akker; S Fert-Ferrer; C Cabrol; C Charrin; I Tigaud; H Poirel; M Vekemans; O A Bernard; R Berger
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 11.528

9.  NUP98-NSD1 links H3K36 methylation to Hox-A gene activation and leukaemogenesis.

Authors:  Gang G Wang; Ling Cai; Martina P Pasillas; Mark P Kamps
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2007-06-24       Impact factor: 28.824

10.  A novel class of zinc finger/leucine zipper genes identified from the molecular cloning of the t(10;11) translocation in acute leukemia.

Authors:  T Chaplin; P Ayton; O A Bernard; V Saha; V Della Valle; J Hillion; A Gregorini; D Lillington; R Berger; B D Young
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1995-03-15       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  8 in total

1.  Dasatinib and navitoclax act synergistically to target NUP98-NSD1+/FLT3-ITD+ acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Jarno L Kivioja; Angeliki Thanasopoulou; Ashwini Kumar; Mika Kontro; Bhagwan Yadav; Muntasir M Majumder; Komal K Javarappa; Samuli Eldfors; Juerg Schwaller; Kimmo Porkka; Caroline A Heckman
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  DDX3X-MLLT10 fusion in adults with NOTCH1 positive T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Lucia Brandimarte; Roberta La Starza; Valentina Gianfelici; Gianluca Barba; Valentina Pierini; Danika Di Giacomo; Jan Cools; Loredana Elia; Antonella Vitale; Luigiana Luciano; Antonella Bardi; Sabina Chiaretti; Caterina Matteucci; Giorgina Specchia; Cristina Mecucci
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  AF10 regulates progressive H3K79 methylation and HOX gene expression in diverse AML subtypes.

Authors:  Aniruddha J Deshpande; Anagha Deshpande; Amit U Sinha; Liying Chen; Jenny Chang; Ali Cihan; Maurizio Fazio; Chun-Wei Chen; Nan Zhu; Richard Koche; Liuda Dzhekieva; Gloria Ibáñez; Stuart Dias; Deepti Banka; Andrei Krivtsov; Minkui Luo; Robert G Roeder; James E Bradner; Kathrin M Bernt; Scott A Armstrong
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 4.  Mechanistic insights and potential therapeutic approaches for NUP98-rearranged hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  Nicole L Michmerhuizen; Jeffery M Klco; Charles G Mullighan
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  t(4;12)(q12;p13) ETV6-rearranged AML without eosinophilia does not involve PDGFRA: relevance for imatinib insensitivity.

Authors:  Sarah B Mueller; Paola Dal Cin; Long P Le; Dora Dias-Santagata; Jochen K Lennerz; A John Iafrate; Hetal Desai Marble; Andrew M Brunner; Matthew J Weinstock; Marlise R Luskin; Daniel J De Angelo; Richard M Stone; Valentina Nardi
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2022-01-08

6.  A JAK/STAT-mediated inflammatory signaling cascade drives oncogenesis in AF10-rearranged AML.

Authors:  Bo-Rui Chen; Anagha Deshpande; Karina Barbosa; Maria Kleppe; Xue Lei; Narayana Yeddula; Pablo Sánchez Vela; Alexandre Rosa Campos; Robert J Wechsler-Reya; Anindya Bagchi; Soheil Meshinchi; Connie Eaves; Irmela Jeremias; Torsten Haferlach; David A Frank; Ze'ev Ronai; Sumit Chanda; Scott A Armstrong; Peter D Adams; Ross L Levine; Aniruddha J Deshpande
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 25.476

7.  The modular network structure of the mutational landscape of Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Mariam Ibáñez; José Carbonell-Caballero; Esperanza Such; Luz García-Alonso; Alessandro Liquori; María López-Pavía; Marta Llop; Carmen Alonso; Eva Barragán; Inés Gómez-Seguí; Alexander Neef; David Hervás; Pau Montesinos; Guillermo Sanz; Miguel Angel Sanz; Joaquín Dopazo; José Cervera
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The role of the PZP domain of AF10 in acute leukemia driven by AF10 translocations.

Authors:  Brianna J Klein; Anagha Deshpande; Khan L Cox; Fan Xuan; Mohamad Zandian; Karina Barbosa; Sujita Khanal; Qiong Tong; Yi Zhang; Pan Zhang; Amit Sinha; Stefan K Bohlander; Xiaobing Shi; Hong Wen; Michael G Poirier; Aniruddha J Deshpande; Tatiana G Kutateladze
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 14.919

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.