| Literature DB >> 23851976 |
Martijn Bouwknegt1, Wilfrid van Pelt, Arie H Havelaar.
Abstract
A demographic shift towards a larger proportion of elderly in the Dutch population in the coming decades might change foodborne disease incidence and mortality. In the current study we focused on the age-specific changes in the occurrence of foodborne pathogens by combining age-specific demographic forecasts for 10-year periods between 2020 and 2060 with current age-specific infection probabilities for Campylobacter spp., non-typhoidal Salmonella, hepatitis A virus, acquired Toxoplasma gondii and Listeria monocytogenes. Disease incidence rates for the former three pathogens were estimated to change marginally, because increases and decreases in specific age groups cancelled out over all ages. Estimated incidence of reported cases per 100,000 for 2060 mounted to 12 (Salmonella), 51 (Campylobacter), 1.1 (hepatitis A virus) and 2.1 (Toxoplasma). For L. monocytogenes, incidence increased by 45% from 0.41 per 100,000 in 2011 to 0.60 per 100,000. Estimated mortality rates increased two-fold for Salmonella and Campylobacter to 0.5 and 0.7 per 100,000, and increased by 25% for Listeria from 0.06 to 0.08. This straightforward scoping effort does not suggest major changes in incidence and mortality for these food borne pathogens based on changes in de population age-structure as independent factor. Other factors, such as changes in health care systems, social clustering and food processing and preparation, could not be included in the estimates.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23851976 PMCID: PMC3734465 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph10072888
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Demographic buildup in four age groups of the Dutch population between 2011 and 2060 according to counts (for 2011) and predictions (from 2020 onwards) by Statistics Netherlands [1].
Estimated age-specific risks (%) for five important foodborne pathogens in The Netherlands.
| Age | HAV 2 | Fatal List 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 1.2 × 10−4 | 7.3 × 10−5 | 0 | 0 |
| 1–4 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 1.5 × 10−3 | 1.8 × 10−5 | 0 | 0 |
| 5–9 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 2.9 × 10−3 | 1.4 × 10−5 | 0 | 0 |
| 10–14 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 2.2 × 10−3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15–19 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 1.6 × 10−3 | 6.7 × 10−5 | 0 | 0 |
| 20–24 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 1.8 × 10−3 | 9.1 × 10−5 | 0 | 0.85 |
| 25–29 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 1.3 × 10−3 | 1.8 × 10−4 | 0 | 0.85 |
| 30–34 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 1.0 × 10−3 | 2.3 × 10−4 | 0 | 0.85 |
| 35–39 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 1.6 × 10−3 | 2.5 × 10−4 | 0 | 0.85 |
| 40–44 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 1.2 × 10−3 | 5.2 × 10−5 | 1.1 × 10−5 | 0.85 |
| 45–49 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 9.4 × 10−4 | 1.5 × 10−4 | 1.1 × 10−5 | 0.85 |
| 50–54 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 7.8 × 10−4 | 2.3 × 10−4 | 8.4 × 10−5 | 0.85 |
| 55–59 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 7.0 × 10−4 | 4.5 × 10−4 | 1.2 × 10−4 | 0.85 |
| 60–64 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 4.1 × 10−4 | 5.8 × 10−4 | 1.8 × 10−4 | 0.85 |
| 65–69 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 2.8 × 10−4 | 1.0 × 10−3 | 1.6 × 10−4 | 0 |
| 70–74 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 1.4 × 10−4 | 1.6 × 10−3 | 3.1 × 10−4 | 0 |
| 75–79 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 2.6 × 10−4 | 1.9 × 10−3 | 3.1 × 10−4 | 0 |
| 80–84 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 3.0 × 10−4 | 2.7 × 10−3 | 1.6 × 10−4 | 0 |
| 85–89 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 1.0 × 10−4 | 2.0 × 10−3 | 0 | 0 |
| ≥90 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 6.9 × 10−4 | 1.9 × 10−3 | 1.5 × 10−4 | 0 |
1 based on cases reported in laboratory surveillance in 2011; 2 based on cases reported in passive surveillance between 2007–2011 (pooled); 3 based on cases cases reported in active surveillance between 2007–2011 (pooled); 4 based on seroconversion as detailed in Havelaar et al. [9].
Figure 2Estimated annual incidence per 100,000 population for five foodborne pathogens until 2060. The changes depicted are based on changes in population buildup regarding age as independent factor.
Figure 3Estimated excess mortality over all ages per 100,000 population due to disease from three foodborne pathogens until 2060. The changes depicted are based on changes in population buildup regarding age as independent factor.