Michael Maes1, Thomas Luyckx, Johan Bellemans. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Weligerveld 1, B-3212 Pellenberg, Leuven, Belgium, michael.maes@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Based on the anatomy of the deep medial collateral ligament (MCL), it was hypothesized that at least part of its cross-sectional insertion area is jeopardized while performing a standard tibial cut in conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to determine whether it is anatomically possible to preserve the tibial deep MCL insertion during conventional TKA. METHODS: Thirty-three unpaired cadaveric knee specimens were used for this study. Knees with severe varus/valgus deformity or damage to the medial structures of the knee were excluded. In the first part of the study, the dimensions of the tibial insertion of the deep MCL and its relationship to the joint line were recorded. Next, the cross-sectional area of the deep MCL insertion was determined using calibrated digital photographic analysis. In the second part, the effect of a standard 9-mm 3° sloped tibial cut on the structural integrity of the deep MCL cross-sectional insertion area was determined using conventional instrumentation. RESULTS: The proximal border of the deep MCL insertion site on the tibia was located on average 4.7 ± 1.2 mm distally to the joint line. After performing a standard 9-mm 3° sloped tibial cut, on average 54% of the deep MCL insertion area was resected. In 29% of the cases, the deep MCL insertion area was completely excised. CONCLUSION: The deep MCL cannot routinely be preserved in conventional TKA. The deep MCL insertion is at risk and may be jeopardized in case of a tibial cut 9 mm below the native joint line. As the deep MCL is a distinct medial stabilizer and plays an important role in rotational stability, this may have implications in future designs of both unicondylar and total knee arthroplasty, but further research is necessary.
PURPOSE: Based on the anatomy of the deep medial collateral ligament (MCL), it was hypothesized that at least part of its cross-sectional insertion area is jeopardized while performing a standard tibial cut in conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to determine whether it is anatomically possible to preserve the tibial deep MCL insertion during conventional TKA. METHODS: Thirty-three unpaired cadaveric knee specimens were used for this study. Knees with severe varus/valgus deformity or damage to the medial structures of the knee were excluded. In the first part of the study, the dimensions of the tibial insertion of the deep MCL and its relationship to the joint line were recorded. Next, the cross-sectional area of the deep MCL insertion was determined using calibrated digital photographic analysis. In the second part, the effect of a standard 9-mm 3° sloped tibial cut on the structural integrity of the deep MCL cross-sectional insertion area was determined using conventional instrumentation. RESULTS: The proximal border of the deep MCL insertion site on the tibia was located on average 4.7 ± 1.2 mm distally to the joint line. After performing a standard 9-mm 3° sloped tibial cut, on average 54% of the deep MCL insertion area was resected. In 29% of the cases, the deep MCL insertion area was completely excised. CONCLUSION: The deep MCL cannot routinely be preserved in conventional TKA. The deep MCL insertion is at risk and may be jeopardized in case of a tibial cut 9 mm below the native joint line. As the deep MCL is a distinct medial stabilizer and plays an important role in rotational stability, this may have implications in future designs of both unicondylar and total knee arthroplasty, but further research is necessary.
Authors: Robert F LaPrade; Anders Hauge Engebretsen; Thuan V Ly; Steinar Johansen; Fred A Wentorf; Lars Engebretsen Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Coen A Wijdicks; Chad J Griffith; Robert F LaPrade; Stanislav I Spiridonov; Steinar Johansen; Bryan M Armitage; Lars Engebretsen Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2009-07-16 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: R Klein; L Serpe; M A Kester; A Edidin; Z Fishkin; O M Mahoney; T P Schmalzried Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Kiron K Athwal; Hadi El Daou; Christoph Kittl; Andrew J Davies; David J Deehan; Andrew A Amis Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2015-10-30 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Emily L Hampp; Nipun Sodhi; Laura Scholl; Matthew E Deren; Zachary Yenna; Geoffrey Westrich; Michael A Mont Journal: Bone Joint Res Date: 2019-11-02 Impact factor: 5.853