AIMS: To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of osteopontin in patients with acute dyspnoea and/or peripheral oedema suspected of having acute congestive heart failure (aCHF). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 401 patients presenting with acute dyspnoea and/or peripheral oedema to the emergency department were prospectively enrolled and followed up for up to 5 years. Blood samples for biomarker measurements were collected on admission to the emergency department. Osteopontin combined with NT-proBNP vs. NT-proBNP alone for diagnosis of aCHF was tested. Additionally, osteopontin vs. NT-proBNP for prognostic outcomes (i.e. all-cause mortality, aCHF-related rehospitalization, and both in combination) was tested. The diagnostic and prognostic capacity of osteopontin was tested by C-statistics, reclassification indices, and multivariable Cox prediction models. Osteopontin plus NT-proBNP improved the diagnostic capacity for aCHF diagnosis [accuracy 76%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 72-80%; specificity 74%, 95% CI 69-79%, net reclassification improvement (NRI) +0.10] compared with NT-proBNP alone in the emergency department (P = 0.0001). Osteopontin independently predicted all-cause mortality and aCHF-related rehospitalization after 1 and 5 years. Compared with NT-proBNP, osteopontin was of superior prognostic value, specifically in aCHF patients and for the prognostic outcome of aCHF-related rehospitalization. CONCLUSION: Osteopontin improves aCHF diagnosis when combined with NT-proBNP. Osteopontin identifies aCHF patients with high 1- and 5-year mortality and rehospitalization risk, and adds prognostic value to NT-proBNP. Trial registration NCT00143793.
AIMS: To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of osteopontin in patients with acute dyspnoea and/or peripheral oedema suspected of having acute congestive heart failure (aCHF). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 401 patients presenting with acute dyspnoea and/or peripheral oedema to the emergency department were prospectively enrolled and followed up for up to 5 years. Blood samples for biomarker measurements were collected on admission to the emergency department. Osteopontin combined with NT-proBNP vs. NT-proBNP alone for diagnosis of aCHF was tested. Additionally, osteopontin vs. NT-proBNP for prognostic outcomes (i.e. all-cause mortality, aCHF-related rehospitalization, and both in combination) was tested. The diagnostic and prognostic capacity of osteopontin was tested by C-statistics, reclassification indices, and multivariable Cox prediction models. Osteopontin plus NT-proBNP improved the diagnostic capacity for aCHF diagnosis [accuracy 76%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 72-80%; specificity 74%, 95% CI 69-79%, net reclassification improvement (NRI) +0.10] compared with NT-proBNP alone in the emergency department (P = 0.0001). Osteopontin independently predicted all-cause mortality and aCHF-related rehospitalization after 1 and 5 years. Compared with NT-proBNP, osteopontin was of superior prognostic value, specifically in aCHFpatients and for the prognostic outcome of aCHF-related rehospitalization. CONCLUSION:Osteopontin improves aCHF diagnosis when combined with NT-proBNP. Osteopontin identifies aCHFpatients with high 1- and 5-year mortality and rehospitalization risk, and adds prognostic value to NT-proBNP. Trial registration NCT00143793.
Authors: Keyvan Yousefi; Camila I Irion; Lauro M Takeuchi; Wen Ding; Guerline Lambert; Trevor Eisenberg; Sarah Sukkar; Henk L Granzier; Mei Methawasin; Dong I Lee; Virginia S Hahn; David A Kass; Konstantinos E Hatzistergos; Joshua M Hare; Keith A Webster; Lina A Shehadeh Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2019-06-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Christoph Roderburg; Fabian Benz; David Vargas Cardenas; Matthias Lutz; Hans-Joerg Hippe; Tom Luedde; Christian Trautwein; Norbert Frey; Alexander Koch; Frank Tacke; Mark Luedde Journal: Crit Care Date: 2015-06-26 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Zhen-Yu Zhang; Susana Ravassa; Esther Nkuipou-Kenfack; Wen-Yi Yang; Shona M Kerr; Thomas Koeck; Archie Campbell; Tatiana Kuznetsova; Harald Mischak; Sandosh Padmanabhan; Anna F Dominiczak; Christian Delles; Jan A Staessen Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2017-08-07 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Georg D Duerr; Bettina Mesenholl; Jan C Heinemann; Martin Zoerlein; Peter Huebener; Prisca Schneider; Andreas Feisst; Alexander Ghanem; Klaus Tiemann; Daniela Dewald; Armin Welz; Oliver Dewald Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-05-29 Impact factor: 3.411