Literature DB >> 23851375

Predictive and protective factors for partial necrosis in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: does nulliparity bias flap viability?

Fabio Santanelli1, Benedetto Longo, Barbara Cagli, Pierfrancesco Pugliese, Michial Sorotos, Guido Paolini.   

Abstract

Although success rate of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction has greatly improved, complications still occasionally occur. Perfusion-related complications (PRCs) (ie, fat necrosis and partial flap necrosis) are the most frequent concern, affecting aesthetic final result of the reconstructed breast. The aim of our study was to retrospectively investigate 287 consecutive DIEP flap breast reconstructions to investigate predictive and protective factors for PRCs.From May 2004 to February 2012, 287 DIEP flap breast reconstructions were performed on 270 patients; 247 unilateral flaps, including Holm vascular zones I to III, were retrospectively selected and analyzed. Tobacco use, mean blood pressure over the first postoperative 48 hours, superficial epigastric vein drainage, medial/lateral row perforator, nulliparity, crystalloid versus combined crystalloid/colloid intravenous fluid infusion therapy, and learning curve were evaluated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.Perfusion-related complications occurred 32 (12.9%) times, 79 (31.9%) patients were smokers, 48 (19.4%) showed postoperative mean blood pressure less than 75 mm Hg, 29 (11.7%) were nulliparous, and 173 (70%) had superficial epigastric vein drainage. Selected perforators were 110 (44.5%) from lateral row, 137 (55.5%) from medial row; 91 (36.8%) received crystalloid fluid infusion, whereas 156 (63.2%) combined crystalloid/colloid fluid infusion. From univariate analysis emerged significance of nulliparity, perforator row and intravenous fluid infusion for PRC. Nevertheless, multivariate model confirmed only nulliparity as a significant risk factor (P = 0.029), although variable correlations to other predictors were found: both medial row perforator and combined crystalloid/colloid fluid infusion potentially decrease the PRC risk of 11.6% and 27.6%, respectively. Learning curve did not show significant decrease of PRC risk over time.Our study first proved nulliparity as a statistically significant predictor for PRCs in DIEP flap breast reconstruction, possibly due to different superficial abdominal perfusion between pluriparous and nulliparous women, with potential weaker pattern of perforators and smaller angiosomes in the latter. The choice of medial row perforators and combined crystalloid/colloid fluid infusion might reduce PRC risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 23851375     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31828d994d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  8 in total

1.  Stacked and bipedicled abdominal free flaps for breast reconstruction: considerations for shaping.

Authors:  Nakul Gamanlal Patel; Warren Matthew Rozen; Whitney T H Chow; Muhammad Chowdhry; Edmund Fitzgerald O'Connor; Hrsikesa Sharma; Matthew Griffiths; Venkat V Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

2.  Effect of heparin on prevention of flap loss in microsurgical free flap transfer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xuan-Liang Pan; Guo-Xian Chen; Hua-Wei Shao; Chun-Mao Han; Li-Ping Zhang; Li-Zhu Zhi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Unilateral breast reconstruction using bilateral inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps.

Authors:  Toshihiko Satake; Mayu Muto; Marina Ogawa; Mai Shibuya; Kazunori Yasumura; Shinji Kobayashi; Takashi Ishikawa; Jiro Maegawa
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-04-07

4.  Diametric Comparison between the Thoracodorsal Vessel and Deep Inferior Epigastric Vessel in Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jun Hyeok Kim; Ye Sol Kim; Suk-Ho Moon; Young Joon Jun; Jong Won Rhie; Deuk Young Oh
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Innovative DIEP flap perfusion evaluation tool: Qualitative and quantitative analysis of indocyanine green-based fluorescence angiography with the SPY-Q proprietary software.

Authors:  Noémie Girard; Myriam Delomenie; Caroline Malhaire; Delphine Sebbag; Aurélie Roulot; Anne Sabaila; Benoît Couturaud; Jean-Guillaume Feron; Fabien Reyal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Patient Management Strategies in Perioperative, Intraoperative, and Postoperative Period in Breast Reconstruction With DIEP-Flap: Clinical Recommendations.

Authors:  Kuo Chen; Narasimha M Beeraka; Mikhail Y Sinelnikov; Jin Zhang; Dajiang Song; Yuanting Gu; Jingruo Li; I V Reshetov; O I Startseva; Junqi Liu; Ruitai Fan; Pengwei Lu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-15

7.  Dynamic Change of CD34 Level during the Survival Process of Narrow Pedicle Flap.

Authors:  Lijun Wu; Tianlan Zhao; Daojiang Yu; Qi Chen; Wenya Han; Wenyuan Yu; Wei Sun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Predictors of Reoperations in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Dmytro Unukovych; Camilo Hernandez Gallego; Helena Aineskog; Andres Rodriguez-Lorenzo; Maria Mani
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-08-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.