Literature DB >> 23851331

Lymph node metastases in rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy: impact of intramesorectal distribution and residual micrometastatic involvement.

Thilo Sprenger1, Hilka Rothe, Heinz Becker, Tim Beissbarth, Kia Homayounfar, Korbinian Gauss, Julia Kitz, Hendrik Wolff, Andreas H Scheel, Michael Ghadimi, Claus Rödel, Lena-Christin Conradi, Torsten Liersch.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: After neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT), the pathologic determined lymph node (LN) status is the most important prognostic factor in rectal cancer patients. Here we assessed the prognostic impact of residual LN micrometastases (<0.2 cm) and the intramesorectal distribution of LN metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Surgical specimens from 81 patients with cUICC II/III rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant CRT and total mesorectal excision within the German Rectal Cancer Trial CAO/ARO/AIO-04 were prospectively evaluated. The entire mesorectal compartment was paraffin embedded and screened microscopically. The number and distribution of mesorectal LN macrometastases and micrometastases were correlated with disease-free (DFS) and cancer-specific overall survival (CSS).
RESULTS: A total of 2412 LNs were detected (mean 29.8±13.7). Twenty-five patients had residual LN metastases (ypN+). The incidence of metastases in the peritumoral mesorectum was higher (7.7%) than that proximal to the tumor (1.5%), whereas no metastases were identified below the tumor level. Patients with both proximal and peritumoral involvement showed a significantly reduced CSS (hazard ratio=5.4; P<0.05). Fourteen patients with ypN+ status (56%) had micrometastases, 9 patients (36%) had only micrometastatic involvement. Patients with nodal macrometastases had a reduced DFS (P<0.01) and CSS (P<0.005) as compared with ypN0 patients, whereas residual micrometastases had no influence on survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high incidence of residual LN micrometastases they did not seem to have a prognostic impact in this series. Micrometastases might indicate responsive tumors to CRT with a more favorable biology. The intramesorectal distribution of LN metastases had a prognostic impact and should be validated in further studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23851331     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182886ced

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  9 in total

1.  [Lymph node metastases in ypT1/2 rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy : The Achilles heel of organ-preserving operative procedures?].

Authors:  T Sprenger; H Rothe; T Beissbarth; L-C Conradi; A Kauffels; K Homayounfar; C L Behnes; C Rödel; T Liersch; M Ghadimi
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Response to chemoradiotherapy and lymph node involvement in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Luis J García-Flórez; Guillermo Gómez-Álvarez; Ana M Frunza; Luis Barneo-Serra; Manuel F Fresno-Forcelledo
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-09-27

Review 3.  Required distal mesorectal resection margin in partial mesorectal excision: a systematic review on distal mesorectal spread.

Authors:  A A J Grüter; A S van Lieshout; S E van Oostendorp; J C F Ket; M Tenhagen; F C den Boer; R Hompes; P J Tanis; J B Tuynman
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 3.699

4.  Establishment and validation of nomograms for predicting mesorectal lymph node staging and restaging.

Authors:  Zixuan Zhuang; Xueqin Ma; Yang Zhang; Xuyang Yang; Mingtian Wei; Xiangbing Deng; Ziqiang Wang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  The impact of pathologic nodal status on survival following neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan M Hernandez; Whalen Clark; Jill Weber; William J Fulp; Lauren Lange; David Shibata
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Quantitative assessment of mesorectal fat: new prognostic biomarker in patients with mid-to-lower rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jiyoung Yoon; Yong Eun Chung; Joon Seok Lim; Myeong-Jin Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Pathologic processing of the total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Molly Campa-Thompson; Robert Weir; Natalie Calcetera; Philip Quirke; Susanne Carmack
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-03

8.  Nodal staging in rectal cancer: why is restaging after chemoradiation more accurate than primary nodal staging?

Authors:  Luc A Heijnen; Monique Maas; Regina G Beets-Tan; Myrthe Berkhof; Doenja M Lambregts; Patty J Nelemans; Robert Riedl; Geerard L Beets
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Good and complete responding locally advanced rectal tumors after chemoradiotherapy: where are the residual positive nodes located on restaging MRI?

Authors:  Luc A Heijnen; Doenja M J Lambregts; Max J Lahaye; Milou H Martens; Thiemo J A van Nijnatten; Sheng-Xiang Rao; Robert G Riedl; Jeroen Buijsen; Monique Maas; Geerard L Beets; Regina G H Beets-Tan
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.