Literature DB >> 23850251

Strain echocardiography improves risk prediction of ventricular arrhythmias after myocardial infarction.

Kristina H Haugaa1, Bjørnar L Grenne, Christian H Eek, Mads Ersbøll, Nana Valeur, Jesper H Svendsen, Anca Florian, Benthe Sjøli, Harald Brunvand, Lars Køber, Jens-Uwe Voigt, Walter Desmet, Otto A Smiseth, Thor Edvardsen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that strain echocardiography might improve arrhythmic risk stratification in patients after myocardial infarction (MI).
BACKGROUND: Prediction of ventricular arrhythmias after MI is challenging. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35% is the main parameter for selecting patients for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy.
METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter study, 569 patients >40 days after acute MI were included, 268 of whom had ST-segment elevation MIs and 301 non-ST-segment elevation MIs. By echocardiography, global strain was assessed as average peak longitudinal systolic strain from 16 left ventricular segments. Time from the electrocardiographic R-wave to peak negative strain was assessed in each segment. Mechanical dispersion was defined as the standard deviation from these 16 time intervals, reflecting contraction heterogeneity.
RESULTS: Ventricular arrhythmias, defined as sustained ventricular tachycardia or sudden death during a median 30 months (interquartile range: 18 months) of follow-up, occurred in 15 patients (3%). LVEFs were reduced (48 ± 17% vs. 55 ± 11%, p < 0.01), global strain was markedly reduced (-14.8 ± 4.7% vs. -18.2 ± 3.7%, p = 0.001), and mechanical dispersion was increased (63 ± 25 ms vs. 42 ± 17 ms, p < 0.001) in patients with arrhythmias compared with those without. Mechanical dispersion was an independent predictor of arrhythmic events (per 10-ms increase, hazard ratio: 1.7; 95% confidence interval: 1.2 to 2.5; p < 0.01). Mechanical dispersion and global strain were markers of arrhythmias in patients with non-ST-segment elevation MIs (p < 0.05 for both) and in those with LVEFs >35% (p < 0.05 for both), whereas LVEF was not (p = 0.33). A combination of mechanical dispersion and global strain showed the best positive predictive value for arrhythmic events (21%; 95% confidence interval: 6% to 46%).
CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical dispersion by strain echocardiography predicted arrhythmic events independently of LVEF in this prospective, multicenter study of patients after MI. A combination of mechanical dispersion and global strain may improve the selection of patients after MI for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy, particularly in patients with LVEFs >35% who did not fulfill current implantable cardioverter-defibrillator indications.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GLS; ICD; LV; LVEDV; LVEF; LVESV; MI; NSTEMI; PPV; PSSI; SCD; global longitudinal strain; implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; left ventricular; left ventricular ejection fraction; left ventricular end-diastolic volume; left ventricular end-systolic volume; myocardial infarction; non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; positive predictive value; post-systolic strain index; risk assessment; strain echocardiography; sudden cardiac death; ventricular arrhythmias

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23850251     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  63 in total

Review 1.  Sudden cardiac death risk stratification.

Authors:  Marc W Deyell; Andrew D Krahn; Jeffrey J Goldberger
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 2.  [Ventricular tachycardia in postinfarction patients and coronary heart disease. Treatment and prognostic significance].

Authors:  Ingo Wickenbrock; Christian Perings
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2014-01-24

Review 3.  Tools for risk stratification of sudden cardiac death: a review of the literature in different patient populations.

Authors:  Loheetha Ragupathi; Behzad B Pavri
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2014-01-11

4.  Noninvasive myocardial blood flow assessment: Another marker of arrhythmic risk?

Authors:  Alejandro Velasco; Harish Doppalapudi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Arrhythmic risk stratification in heart failure: Time for the next step?

Authors:  Konstantinos A Gatzoulis; Antonios Sideris; Emmanuel Kanoupakis; Skevos Sideris; Nikolaos Nikolaou; Christos-Konstantinos Antoniou; Theofilos M Kolettis
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 6.  Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular systolic function.

Authors:  Lars Gunnar Klaeboe; Thor Edvardsen
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2018-11-02

7.  Regional and temporal changes in left ventricular strain and stiffness in a porcine model of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  William M Torres; Julia Jacobs; Heather Doviak; Shayne C Barlow; Michael R Zile; Tarek Shazly; Francis G Spinale
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 8.  Cardiac imaging in evaluating patients prone to sudden death.

Authors:  Ashenafi Tamene; Venkatakrishna N Tholakanahalli; Y Chandrashekhar
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2014-01-12

Review 9.  Imaging for assessment of sudden death risk: current role and future prospects.

Authors:  Takeki Suzuki; Saman Nazarian; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Sumeet S Chugh
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 10.  Timing of Surgical Intervention for Aortic Regurgitation.

Authors:  Brett Hiendlmayr; Joseph Nakda; Ossama Elsaid; Xuan Wang; Aidan Flynn
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.