Geoffrey O Ouma1, Eduardo Rodriguez2, Karuppiah Muthumani3, David B Weiner3, Robert L Wilensky4, Emile R Mohler5. 1. Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Vascular Medicine Section, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania and University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pa. Electronic address: geoffrey.ouma@uphs.upenn.edu. 2. Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania and University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pa. 3. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania and University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pa. 4. Cardiovascular Division, Hospitial of the University of Pennsylvania and Cardiovascular Institute, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania and University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pa. 5. Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Vascular Medicine Section, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania and University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pa.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α) is a transcription factor that stimulates angiogenesis during tissue ischemia. In vivo electroporation (EP) enhances tissue DNA transfection. We hypothesized that in vivo EP of plasmid DNA encoding a constitutively expressed HIF-1α gene enhances neovascularization compared with intramuscular (IM) injection alone. METHODS: Left femoral artery ligation was performed in mice assigned to three groups: (1) HIF-EP (n = 13); (2) HIF-IM (n = 14); and (3) empty plasmid (pVAX)-EP (n = 12). A single dose of HIF-1α or pVAX DNA (20 μL of 5 μg/μL each) was injected into the ischemic adductor muscle followed by EP (groups one and three). Mice in group two received IM injection of HIF-1α plasmid DNA alone. From preligation to days 0, 3, 7, 14, and 21 postligation, limb perfusion recovery quantified by laser Doppler perfusion imager, limb function, and limb necrosis were measured. On day 21, the surviving mice (4-5 per group) were sacrificed and adductor muscle tissues stained for necrosis using hematoxylin and eosin, capillary density (anti-CD31 antibodies), and collateral vessels via anti-α-smooth muscle actin antibodies. RESULTS: In vivo EP of HIF-1α DNA significantly improved limb perfusion (HIF-EP: 1.03 ± 0.15 vs HIF-IM: 0.78 ± 0.064; P < .05, vs pVAX-EP: 0.41 ± 0.019; P < .001), limb functional recovery (HIF-EP: 3.5 ± 0.58 vs HIF-IM, 2.4 ± 1.14; P < .05, vs pVAX-EP: 2.4 ± 1.14; P < .001), and limb autoamputation on day 21 (HIF-EP: 77% ± 12% vs HIF-IM: 43% ± 14%; P < .05 vs pVAX-EP: 17% ± 11%; P < .01). Adductor muscle tissue necrosis decreased (HIF-EP: 20.7% ± 1.75% vs HIF-IM: 44% ± 3.73; P < .001, vs pVAX-EP: 60.05% ± 2.17%; P < .0001), capillary density increased (HIF-EP: 96.83 ± 5.72 vessels/high-powered field [hpf] vs HIF-IM: 62.87 ± 2.0 vessels/hpf; P < .001, vs pVAX-EP: 39.37 ± 2.76 vessels/hpf; P < .0001), collateral vessel formation increased (HI-EP: 76.33 ± 1.94 vessels/hpf vs HIF-IM: 37.5 ± 1.56 vessels/hpf; P < .0001, vs pVAX-EP: 18.5 ± 1.34 vessels/hpf; P < .00001), and the vessels were larger (HIF-EP: 15,521.67 ± 1298.16 μm(2) vs HIF-IM: 7788.87 ± 392.04 μm(2); P < .001 vs pVAX-EP: 4640.25 ± 614.01 μm(2); P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: In vivo EP-mediated delivery of HIF-1α plasmid DNA improves neovascularization in a mouse model of limb ischemia and is a potentially suitable nonviral, noninvasive intervention to facilitate therapeutic angiogenesis in critical limb ischemia.
OBJECTIVE:Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α) is a transcription factor that stimulates angiogenesis during tissue ischemia. In vivo electroporation (EP) enhances tissue DNA transfection. We hypothesized that in vivo EP of plasmid DNA encoding a constitutively expressed HIF-1α gene enhances neovascularization compared with intramuscular (IM) injection alone. METHODS: Left femoral artery ligation was performed in mice assigned to three groups: (1) HIF-EP (n = 13); (2) HIF-IM (n = 14); and (3) empty plasmid (pVAX)-EP (n = 12). A single dose of HIF-1α or pVAX DNA (20 μL of 5 μg/μL each) was injected into the ischemic adductor muscle followed by EP (groups one and three). Mice in group two received IM injection of HIF-1α plasmid DNA alone. From preligation to days 0, 3, 7, 14, and 21 postligation, limb perfusion recovery quantified by laser Doppler perfusion imager, limb function, and limb necrosis were measured. On day 21, the surviving mice (4-5 per group) were sacrificed and adductor muscle tissues stained for necrosis using hematoxylin and eosin, capillary density (anti-CD31 antibodies), and collateral vessels via anti-α-smooth muscle actin antibodies. RESULTS: In vivo EP of HIF-1α DNA significantly improved limb perfusion (HIF-EP: 1.03 ± 0.15 vs HIF-IM: 0.78 ± 0.064; P < .05, vs pVAX-EP: 0.41 ± 0.019; P < .001), limb functional recovery (HIF-EP: 3.5 ± 0.58 vs HIF-IM, 2.4 ± 1.14; P < .05, vs pVAX-EP: 2.4 ± 1.14; P < .001), and limb autoamputation on day 21 (HIF-EP: 77% ± 12% vs HIF-IM: 43% ± 14%; P < .05 vs pVAX-EP: 17% ± 11%; P < .01). Adductor muscle tissue necrosis decreased (HIF-EP: 20.7% ± 1.75% vs HIF-IM: 44% ± 3.73; P < .001, vs pVAX-EP: 60.05% ± 2.17%; P < .0001), capillary density increased (HIF-EP: 96.83 ± 5.72 vessels/high-powered field [hpf] vs HIF-IM: 62.87 ± 2.0 vessels/hpf; P < .001, vs pVAX-EP: 39.37 ± 2.76 vessels/hpf; P < .0001), collateral vessel formation increased (HI-EP: 76.33 ± 1.94 vessels/hpf vs HIF-IM: 37.5 ± 1.56 vessels/hpf; P < .0001, vs pVAX-EP: 18.5 ± 1.34 vessels/hpf; P < .00001), and the vessels were larger (HIF-EP: 15,521.67 ± 1298.16 μm(2) vs HIF-IM: 7788.87 ± 392.04 μm(2); P < .001 vs pVAX-EP: 4640.25 ± 614.01 μm(2); P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: In vivo EP-mediated delivery of HIF-1α plasmid DNA improves neovascularization in a mouse model of limb ischemia and is a potentially suitable nonviral, noninvasive intervention to facilitate therapeutic angiogenesis in critical limb ischemia.
Authors: Tarak H Patel; Hideo Kimura; Clifford R Weiss; Gregg L Semenza; Lawrence V Hofmann Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2005-10-01 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Anne Limbourg; Merlin Ploom; Diana Elligsen; Inga Sörensen; Tibor Ziegelhoeffer; Achim Gossler; Helmut Drexler; Florian P Limbourg Journal: Circ Res Date: 2007-01-18 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Marta Bosch-Marce; Hiroaki Okuyama; Jacob B Wesley; Kakali Sarkar; Hideo Kimura; Ye V Liu; Huafeng Zhang; Marianne Strazza; Sergio Rey; Lindsey Savino; Yi Fu Zhou; Karin R McDonald; Youn Na; Scott Vandiver; Alireza Rabi; Yuval Shaked; Robert Kerbel; Theresa Lavallee; Gregg L Semenza Journal: Circ Res Date: 2007-10-11 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Savannah E Est-Witte; Ashley L Farris; Stephany Y Tzeng; Daphne L Hutton; Dennis H Gong; Kaitlyn G Calabresi; Warren L Grayson; Jordan J Green Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2020-07-02 Impact factor: 10.633
Authors: Xinzhi Li; Laurel L Ballantyne; Xinghui Che; Jeffrey D Mewburn; Jing X Kang; Robert M Barkley; Robert C Murphy; Ying Yu; Colin D Funk Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2015-04-06 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Dorina Veliceasa; Dauren Biyashev; Gangjian Qin; Sol Misener; Alexander Roy Mackie; Raj Kishore; Olga V Volpert Journal: Vasc Cell Date: 2015-06-24