Literature DB >> 23850038

Referral pathways in colorectal cancer: an audit of surgeons's records.

Allan D Spigelman1, Shane W Pascoe, Mark F Harris, Justin J Beilby, Lisa J Crossland, Rohan M Gett, Michael B Barton, Upali W Jayasinghe.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To explore the referral pathways of patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer to surgeons.
METHOD: Australian surgeons from three states completed a questionnaire and their records were audited.
RESULTS: Thirty-three surgeons provided data on 530 patients seen in the preceding 12 months. The median time between colonoscopy and first surgical consult was 10 days, with 19% of patients waiting more than 28 days. After adjustment for clustering, no surgeon factors were associated with the number of days between colonoscopy and surgery. A report back to the general practitioner (GP) was found in 78% of patients' records. This feedback varied between surgeons but none of the specific surgeon characteristics examined could explain this.
CONCLUSION: Surgeons usually communicated with GP regardless of whether they were the referral source. However, communication with GP varied considerably among surgeons, with no evidence of a report to the GP in one-fifth of cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23850038     DOI: 10.1071/AH13038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Health Rev        ISSN: 0156-5788            Impact factor:   1.990


  2 in total

1.  The Benefits of Colorectal Surgery Surveys in Australia and New Zealand.

Authors:  Auerilius Erastus Ricardo Hamilton; Amelia Alice Lin; Christopher John Young
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2020-04-30

2.  The Value of Continuity between Primary Care and Surgical Care in Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Tanvir Hussain; Hsien-Yen Chang; Ngoc-Phuong Luu; Craig Evan Pollack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.