Literature DB >> 23849715

Site-dependent effects of tDCS uncover dissociations in the communication network underlying the processing of visual search.

Keira Ball1, Alison R Lane, Daniel T Smith, Amanda Ellison.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The right posterior parietal cortex (rPPC) and the right frontal eye field (rFEF) form part of a network of brain areas involved in orienting spatial attention. Previous studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) have demonstrated that both areas are critically involved in the processing of conjunction visual search tasks, since stimulation of these sites disrupts performance.
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the effects of long term neuronal modulation to rPPC and rFEF using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with the aim of uncovering sharing of these resources in the processing of conjunction visual search tasks.
METHODS: Participants completed four blocks of conjunction search trials over the course of 45 min. Following the first block they received 15 min of either cathodal or anodal stimulation to rPPC or rFEF, or sham stimulation.
RESULTS: A significant interaction between block and stimulation condition was found, indicating that tDCS caused different effects according to the site (rPPC or rFEF) and type of stimulation (cathodal, anodal, or sham). Practice resulted in a significant reduction in reaction time across the four blocks in all conditions except when cathodal tDCS was applied to rPPC.
CONCLUSIONS: The effects of cathodal tDCS over rPPC are subtler than those seen with TMS, and no effect of tDCS was evident at rFEF. This suggests that rFEF has a more transient role than rPPC in the processing of conjunction visual search and is robust to longer-term methods of neuro-disruption. Our results may be explained within the framework of functional connectivity between these, and other, areas.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conjunction search; Frontal eye fields; Posterior parietal cortex; Spatial attention; Transcranial direct current stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23849715     DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  8 in total

1.  No Evidence That Frontal Eye Field tDCS Affects Latency or Accuracy of Prosaccades.

Authors:  Leon C Reteig; Tomas Knapen; Floris J F W Roelofs; K Richard Ridderinkhof; Heleen A Slagter
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.677

2.  Effects of Cerebellar tDCS on Inhibitory Control: Evidence from a Go/NoGo Task.

Authors:  Daniela Mannarelli; Caterina Pauletti; Alessia Petritis; Roberto Delle Chiaie; Antonio Currà; Carlo Trompetto; Francesco Fattapposta
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Functional interaction between right parietal and bilateral frontal cortices during visual search tasks revealed using functional magnetic imaging and transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Amanda Ellison; Keira L Ball; Peter Moseley; James Dowsett; Daniel T Smith; Susanne Weis; Alison R Lane
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The role of the superior temporal lobe in auditory false perceptions: a transcranial direct current stimulation study.

Authors:  Peter Moseley; Charles Fernyhough; Amanda Ellison
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 5.  Non-invasive Brain Stimulation and Auditory Verbal Hallucinations: New Techniques and Future Directions.

Authors:  Peter Moseley; Ben Alderson-Day; Amanda Ellison; Renaud Jardri; Charles Fernyhough
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) facilitates overall visual search response times but does not interact with visual search task factors.

Authors:  Kyongje Sung; Barry Gordon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Behavioral Effects of tDCS on Visual Search Performance Are Not Influenced by the Location of the Reference Electrode.

Authors:  Amanda Ellison; Keira L Ball; Alison R Lane
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Conventional and HD-tDCS May (or May Not) Modulate Overt Attentional Orienting: An Integrated Spatio-Temporal Approach and Methodological Reflections.

Authors:  Lorenzo Diana; Giulia Scotti; Edoardo N Aiello; Patrick Pilastro; Aleksandra K Eberhard-Moscicka; René M Müri; Nadia Bolognini
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-12-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.